L’Eau Jolie Lolita Lempicka

3.88 из 5
(66 отзывов)

L’Eau Jolie Lolita Lempicka

L’Eau Jolie Lolita Lempicka

Rated 3.88 out of 5 based on 66 customer ratings
(66 customer reviews)

L’Eau Jolie Lolita Lempicka for women of Lolita Lempicka

SKU:  b7237168d288 Perfume Category:  . Fragrance Brand: Notes:  , , , , , .
Share:

Description

Lolita Lempicka launches a new fragrance intended for summer season. This fresh, floral – fruity and woody interpretation of the original Lolita Lempicka perfume comes out in April 2013 under the name of L’Eau Jolie.

Fruity and gourmand flavors of black currant and rich Nashi pear open the composition that continues with coquettish heart notes of neroli and peach blossom. The perfume closes with a sensual cloud of musk and cedar.

It is available as 30 and 50 ml Eau de Toilette.

66 reviews for L’Eau Jolie Lolita Lempicka

  1. :

    5 out of 5

    Fresh, gentle, feminine. A good spring scent. It remind me of J’adore.

  2. :

    4 out of 5

    Previous reviews have mentioned that this is more of an aquatic floral, and knowing this, I probably shouldn’t have bought it, as aquatics don’t agree with me. However, I generally like notes of black currant and nashi pear, so I took a chance. This is overly sweet on me, and I have a hard time spraying it lightly enough that I don’t get a headache. I gave it to a friend who loves this kind of scent, and she was thrilled to own this beautiful bottle!

  3. :

    5 out of 5

    Like a fresh spring breeze through apple blossom trees.
    Light, sweet, floral & fruity. Great for casual wear and non offensive. Simple and fresh.
    Similar to DKNY Be Delicious Fresh Blossom, but more floral.

  4. :

    4 out of 5

    neroli and more neroli

  5. :

    4 out of 5

    I bought this blind because I have a few of Lolita Lempicka fragrances and I love them. So after looking at the notes and a few reviews I decided to try it. I am glad I did. It is a beautiful floral perfume. Not at all like the other Lolita Lempicka fragrances. It is soft and sensual, yet strong enough to be noticed. It is a beautiful fragrance.

  6. :

    3 out of 5

    Might this be one of the few perfumes that doesn’t turn instantly into nauseating powder on my skin? I think it is quite lovely, but a little too “young” for me.

  7. :

    4 out of 5

    This is ver aquatic/generic smelling to me. The pear is there, but watered down by whatever gives this such a strong aquatic vibe. I much prefer Dana Chantilly Eau de Vie, which is a beautiful juicy realistic pear. This one was a bit of a disappointment, I much prefer the original LL.

  8. :

    4 out of 5

    Was attracted but the cute packaging. Lovely, fresh scent which is forgettable but lovely nonetheless. Not lovely enough for me to purchase it but it does not make me squirm in disgust. Would definitely appeal more to young girls as it is light and fresh and fruity.

  9. :

    3 out of 5

    Nice, delicate, unobtrusive, summery. Content fits the bottle looks well. Nothing special, but pleasant.

  10. :

    4 out of 5

    A sharp, refreshing, fruity floral, with a dated peppery note that I just can’t define! It is that exact “peppery” feel that kind of ruins this perfume for me.
    Not overly crazy about “L’Eau Jolie”, but I still like it!
    Good sillage and pretty long lasting, it’s “coolness” makes it perfect for Spring and Summer.

  11. :

    5 out of 5

    Absolutely nothing left of the original Lolita Lempicka in this. This is a clean, dry fruity floral, almost a bit detergenty, with crisp, screechy pear. Kind of musky. I have smelled a million things similar to this before and I will smell a million more. Not too stoked, sorry to say.

  12. :

    4 out of 5

    Light, fresh, floral, fruity, and elegant. I am comfortable wearing this in any setting. This is extremely important to me since I do not want my fragrance to make others uncomfortable. This is very unlikely to offend others as it is very subtle. I won’t do it justice if I try to describe this scent… it is nuanced and sophisticated. Suffice it to say that it is probably the most loved fragrance in my wardrobe… I bought a back-up bottle after wearing it once.
    Scent: 10/10
    Silliage: 2/10
    Longevity: 5/10

  13. :

    3 out of 5

    Oh, how I wish I could smell intricate little details in perfumes. I have up and decided that my nose is broken. Or warped. Or maybe it’s my skin, or my chemistry, whatever that really means. I never smell what others do…
    I blind bought this after reading about all the Lolita flankers. The original smells very powdery with a touch of licorice and a very woody dry down. I tried the EDT and grew to like the soapy freshness, and seeing some of the reviewers bought at shoppers for $20, I took a boo at my friendly neighbourhood shoppers, and voila, there she was. Unfortunately, I lied when I said it was friendly, because it was in a sketchy neighbourhood where the clientele likely has a penchant for walking off with the testers, so all the perfumes were locked up and therefore I couldn’t try this. I figured what the hell, I can’t take it with me, so spent $22.40 (tax).
    After ripping the package open, I was hoping I would have a flowery open with a lovely fruity middle with perhaps a powdery dry down. Yes, the initial spray I smelled flowers. It turned into something I’ve yet to put my finger on that I get from certain perfumes. I thought maybe iris, or maybe what others may refer to as “aquatic”? I wish I can take my nose and have someone else smell it so they can tell me. Anyway, it’s the same sort of scent I got from (don’t laugh, I’m really not crazy) Acqua di Gioia and a number of other cheap store perfumes (Victoria’s secret, Hollister).
    The awaited dry down escaped me completely. I have to put my (broken) nose right up to my wrist and I do get a bit of powder.
    Don’t me wrong, it’s inoffensive, and very much a safe blind buy, but I just really wish I could say I smell pears or peaches or even something remotely woody (though I’m not a fan of woody like Flower Bomb or Prada Candy, and at the end of it, the original LL).
    I like the sweet gourmands, the simpler the better because obviously my nose is simple. Give me licorice, give me custard, give me vanilla. I’m just not the flowery kind of girl, I guess. Anyone want to swap a bottle of this minus 2 sprays?
    Edit: I had a eureka moment (or a d’oh!). The note I can’t put my finger on is the “synthetic” je ne sais quoi that some reviewers have mentioned. It’s something synthetic that just doesn’t smell entirely right to me, and it could be something they put in cheaper perfumes to cut the cost or something.

  14. :

    3 out of 5

    I recently purchased a bottle of this perfume online as a blind buy. I have tried LL’s original perfume and while I find the scent pleasant, its not something I really want to wear on myself. I had a friend who loved it so I gave it to her. But alas… I really missed that cute bottle. So yea, that’s pretty much the reason I got this one.
    I generally like floral fruity, fresh, and green type fragrances so I knew this would be a safe blind buy for me. First spray smells very floral and fresh… like an intense bouqeut of flowers and grass. It makes me think of nostalgic memories of playing in a flower field on a warm, sunny afternoon as a child. Like others have mentioned, it does have an innocence and softness about it. While it is not listed as a note, I kind of smell tuberose or gardenia.. maybe it’s just me. It’s a very nice scent that dries off into a soapy smell that kind of reminds me of the bars of soap that you get in hotel rooms.
    Seems to last a good while on my skin. It smells warm and a bit creamy and powdery on me. Overall I’d say it’s a safe and inoffensive perfume.

  15. :

    3 out of 5

    Let me start my review by explaining that prior to yesterday every Lolita Lempicka perfume I smelled was absolutely disgusting. I couldn’t even tolerate the smell, not like just a perfume that just isn’t for me-they were flat out awful. So last night while browsing the $19.99 shelf at shoppers drug mart I came upon this. There was slim pickins left so I smelled this thinking I bet its just as awful as the others….boy was I wrong! This is actually beautiful. It’s very girly, soft but not a barely there scent. I really wanted to buy this one but it was only a 30ml bottle and I couldnt justify buying this over a perfume that was a 100ml bottle for the same price. I’m kicking myself now though, as much as I do love the one I bought instead of this…i really want this one.

  16. :

    3 out of 5

    This is the first Lolita Lempicka scent that I have actually enjoyed. It’s a crisp, slightly sweet, fruity floral that has very good sillage and longevity on me but I do spray liberally. It was also very inexpensive and a 100ml bottle was only 25 bucks. I love the bottle too, so pretty. I love this one and it’s very refreshing in the summer heat. 🙂

  17. :

    5 out of 5

    Jolie is very different with other lolitas,it’s fresh,bright,less sweet,young and flirty
    It’s not groundbreaking,unique and seductive but it’s clean,refreshing and gorgeous
    Jolie is a combination of delicate blossoms,fruity notes and soft,clean musk very springy,also fresh and crisp enough for summer days,it’s inoffensive, easy to love and feminine,a safe gift for light fragrance lovers
    It’s not heavy and sillage is soft,but longevity is acceptable. I love it’s apple shaped glass bottle with white and golden leaves on it,I also love it’s beautiful freshness,without being citrusy or soapy or childish fruity,just a tad powdery

  18. :

    3 out of 5

    As previously mentioned in the comments below, this is a different kind of Lolita scent. It is not as sweet or as “thick” like the other ones. It’s more radiant, fresh, and sparkly.
    A modern fruity-floral. When considering all the listed notes, nothing in particular stands out (but all are there), so imo – the frag is really well blended.
    Great choice for school or work, and certainly more suitable for young(er) women. In other words, this is one very girly, summery, casual frag. Inoffensive and unpretentious. I like it 🙂

  19. :

    4 out of 5

    Ughhh… blind bought it because of the clearance sale at shoppers, oh well…
    Cucumber, apple, some flowers maybe – this is what i smell. Very close to Donna Karan Green Apple. Who would have thought that Lolita Lempicka will do something so green and airy, from absolutely different universe compared to her other works!
    On the bright side, on hot summer days that we are enjoying right now, this fresh and airy perfume might be not so bad.
    Also: staying power is good!

  20. :

    4 out of 5

    Very weak fragrance. Indeed underwhelming for a Lolita Lempicka. Good to wear to bed or for the days when you want something very light.

  21. :

    4 out of 5

    With my chemistry it’s all about black currant. Just like with Lalique Amethyst. Would be gorgeous if I’d like black currant… it’s not a bad scent, though pretty generic. Nothing very special if you compare it to other Lolita’s frag. A bit too generic to my taste. OK for a casual evening. Good sillage and longevity though.

  22. :

    3 out of 5

    It is blooming kind of fresh. I don’t like it, it’s a little sharp for my taste. I don’t sense any pear note or musk. I think there’s definitely neroli and that blossom note. Some wood as well.
    It imitates blooming trees kind of well, but is still too synthetic smelling for me to like it.

  23. :

    5 out of 5

    Blind buy…. it reminds of Tommy girl but it’s too weak,annoyingly weak!!!!…
    it definately reminds me of moonflower from Body shop but why….. did you name this fragrance Lolita Lempicka… A different name for a different perfume! Wouldn’t recommend to buy,go for Tommy Girl if you like this one, because of the longevity.

  24. :

    3 out of 5

    More fruity than floral, the pear note is most prominent–sweet and inoffensive, a little young. Feels more suitable for a teenager or college-age person.

  25. :

    5 out of 5

    I bought this today, as a blind buy, at Marshall’s on clearance for $15. It is my first Lempicka and I am so happy with this purchase. I smell mainly Neroli and Pear, simplistic but oh so graceful. I have found my new Summer scent! YAY!

  26. :

    3 out of 5

    This has openings of sweet pears and honeycomb Melon which is beautiful and then it has a trail of dust. The type of dust you smell in a vintage London theatre or on top of pretty silk flowers just subtle but i like it. It reminds me of Grungettes/ Grunge girls-Nirvana girls in the 90’s dark berry lipstick, side flicked hair moody faces femme chic mixed with some masculinity wearing the most feminine perfumes to lift the edge of their looks.
    Like the captivating complexities of hypnotic poison and Lolita…I am wearing this in bed….it’s good.

  27. :

    3 out of 5

    I tried a sample, and feel disappointed. It starts with sharp citrus scent, then comes a plain floral scent (really plain!). Musk and floral are blended okay, but I can pick some scent that makes me feel headache. I don’t know what it is, maybe either naroli or cedar, it smells like old ladies’s clothes or something like that. I just don’t like it ! Also, I can’t smell any sweet from fruity as they mentioned in the description.

  28. :

    5 out of 5

    Jolie is exactly like this page suggests: fruity, floral, musky (woody to me), and fresh. It’s a loud sharp citrus in the open that doesn’t last long, then a pleasant (however– generic) floral with a woody drydown.
    It smells like other things, sure… but this is actually unique in my collection because I’m a gourmand nut… but I’m also a LL collector.
    I actually can’t pick out the notes… “Fruity and gourmand flavors of black currant and rich Nashi pear open the composition that continues with coquettish heart notes of neroli and peach blossom. The perfume closes with a sensual cloud of musk and cedar.” Except for Cedar. I don’t get currant or pear, just citrus, but I suppose the sharpness IS the currant. I don’t really get peach blossom. But overall, it’s wearable, gorgeous bottle, and pleasant. It’s fresh and floral.
    This has nothing in common with any other LLs… def not a summer version of the original. If you are looking for that, this isn’t it.

  29. :

    3 out of 5

    enchanted spring in a beautiful bottle 🙂 oh Lolita Lempicka, how you evoke the imagination inside me…this is what the first day of spring in the fairy realim smells like! gathered pears, juicy berries, fresh cut picked Peach blossoms surrounded with Neroli just in time for the first day of the spring gathering, the fresh aroma is intertwined by the scent of the Cedar wood from the forest where the fairy realim is hidden..

  30. :

    3 out of 5

    I actually like this. Yes, it probably is a bit generic but it’s a welcome addition to my wardrobe as I don’t really have anything else like this.
    It kind of reminds me of the opening of Kate Moss Lilabelle Truly Adorable. LTA went a bit dry on my skin whereas this stays fresh which is exactly what I was after.

  31. :

    3 out of 5

    i blinded buy this because of the pretty bottle (one of the most prettiest i think. the other prettiest is Shalimar Initial) and the fact that it is said to remind ppls of body shop moonflower (discontinued).
    Monflower is my first full bottle frangrance and i liked the scent. I miss it for all those years so i have to try out Jolie.
    Jolie definitely reminds me of moonflower from the first spray! it is a bit sweeter then monflower but i have no complaint (afterall it is not moonflower!) and i am very contented.

  32. :

    5 out of 5

    This smell sweet but not too sweet and flowery i really like this , if you like fresh perfum this is a good one,for those who like glow jlo this lolita lempicka l’eau jolie is better choice because its more sophisticated,i apreciate the creativity of the bottle and the carton box its so cute and classy.❤️

  33. :

    5 out of 5

    sigh. I wish I could smell the black currant….but I mainly get a ‘soapy’ vibe from this one. Powdery and musky and I would swear a ‘watermelon’ type smell before it disappears.

  34. :

    4 out of 5

    This is not typical Lolita Lempicka. L’eau Jolie is a sharp citrus…very much a departure from any of the other Lempicka fragrances I have experienced.

  35. :

    5 out of 5

    it’s funny that none of my guesses are listed as notes here!but let’s get started how I felt it smells like.when I sprayed it first, I felt it smells like fresh wood mixed with white flowers and powdery notes, like violet or violet leaf. Soon, it changed to warmer white floral fragrance which is young, but not teenagery. maybe a more decent version of my beloved tommy girl. right now that I’m smelling it (after one hour of applying) it smells like musk, wood and powder.while it smells pretty warm on my skin, on paper, it smells fresher, somehow similar to she wood.
    all in all, this is more floral that most of LL perfumes I’ve smelt ever and even though it does not have much in common with well-known LL perfumes, which almost all include licorise, I like it and I think it would be a great choice for spring and summer.

  36. :

    4 out of 5

    This is not what I expected of a Lolita Lempicka. One word that immediately came to mind after one whiff was “synthetic”. It is also kind of linear and does not evolve much on skin. I’ve always admired complex scents that keep me interested the whole time I am wearing them and this is not one of those. Most scents conjure up memories of the past; while some really good ones transport you to another lifetime or a parallel universe. The only image that was conjured up in my mind when I smelled it was the graveyard of mass-marketed bottles of perfumes I got suckered in to buy.

  37. :

    4 out of 5

    Smells like melon and flowers to me. And I feel they ought to have categorized this one as aquatic. It’s nice but I feel I have smelled others just like it.

  38. :

    3 out of 5

    This is so well blended I can’t pick apart what I smell. All I know is I wanna bath in it! Love Love Love. Its fresh and sweet. My 2 fav ingredient, pears and neroli are present and it smells good. The current are done well not aggressive, and thank god no anise or licorice bc I can’t stand those note. This is the reason I didnt order the original Lolita instead opt. for L’eau jolie and no regrets!
    **there are some sections of this perfume that smells like Oscar de la Renta Live in Love perfume. Another one of my fav =)

  39. :

    5 out of 5

    I can’t smell almost any fruit in this. It’s all flowers. At the beginning it gives a little hint about pear and then it’s Only flowers. Funny to read the reviews about fruitiness…
    This is a nice, elegant perfume but it just didn’t suit me. Luckily I found someone who wanted to swap L. Lempicka because she didn’t like it. She loved this and i really need to stick to that original.
    Bottle is lovely and the liquid is very lovely in colour.

  40. :

    5 out of 5

    Straight from the nozzle, you could smell the musky peonies, and this is what I first perceive on my skin, along with a bergamot-like presence that is peppered with peach. It’s actually a little richer than I thought it would be, but still manages to retain a somewhat light quality throughout.
    As far as I can tell, it doesn’t develop much, apart from becoming a little more fruity as it wears on. Its powdery texture reminds me of some other rose-centered perfumes that I’ve tried, but have no fear rose-haters, it doesn’t resemble a rose in any way, even though at some points, it gets a little jasmine-esque. A while before it dies, it gains a deeper creamy peachy woody (forgive the many y’s) feel that is like a pretty skin scent.
    In more ways than one, L’eau Jolie is a disappointment, to me, that is. It feels like a lazy perfume that refuses to accomplish its full potential. On me, it is neither rich nor light enough, neither fruity nor floral, neither powdery nor soapy enough. With some perfumes, combos like that work, but with this, it just feels half-baked. Lukewarm. I wish Lolita Lempicka had worked on giving it a defining edge, rather than leaving unfinished ends.
    It is not horrible, by any means. In fact, I do believe that this would make a rather unoffensive day-to-day perfume, but it’s just not one I would bother getting an FB of, which is terribly disappointing because I can see how this can be a fairly elegant and feminine perfume. I’m sorry to say that there are better perfumes out there with similar notes that do a better job.
    Longevity: a little less than 3 hours
    Sillage: Next to none. I have to hold my hand up to my nose to get a sniff.

  41. :

    3 out of 5

    I’m hoping I have a bad sample because for me, this opens with a lot of very artificial red froot, which is either Slushee or a bad interpretation of ripe currants. No florals and an apathetic musk. After several hours there’s been no development and the projection seems like it’s embarassed. I’ve sampled several Lempickas I’ve loved, some I don’t like; but this is the first where my reaction is that it’s poorly made and cheap smelling. Hope springs eternal…
    Sillage: 2-3 ft, arm’s length
    Duration: 2-3 hours so far
    Fabulosity: Blue raspberry koolaid
    Value to price ratio: poor
    2/10

  42. :

    4 out of 5

    I smelled this blind and was surprised to see what it’s meant to be. To me it smells a bit like fresh squeezed lemon juice. No peel, just the juice, with a bouquet of lovely flowers.
    I think it’s quite lovely and the bottle is just as pretty as it can be. I would give this to a young girl who isn’t fond of the sweet, vanilla based scents, or who wants something different to add to her wardrobe.

  43. :

    3 out of 5

    This is gorgeous – I get ripe, rich pear,with hints of peach blossom and neroli drying down to a clean musky base. I don’t get any of the black currant note which is fine, since I don’t care for it. It’s a very delicate and completely feminine fragrance. It may not be a very unusual scent, but I have plenty of those to choose from. I find L’Eau Jolie to be a very joyous fragrance, and I’ve ordered a full size bottle.

  44. :

    3 out of 5

    I finally got the fragrance in the mail today it’s very fresh and clean with a light musky scent reminds me a bit of glow by j.lo but better I pick up notes of musk,pear,then peach blossom perfect for spring time

  45. :

    4 out of 5

    First the bottle is gorgeous. This smells exactly like Body Shop’s Moonflower on my body! Only difference is that it is much less sweet than the Body Shop’s Moonflower, so it can be wore by mature ladies. It is linear on my body. There isn’t any fruit or wood note. I only smell floral notes on my body. It is light and low stillage. This gives the view of a feminine, soft and gentle lady. I love this fragrance. It is suitable for office wear and hot weather. It is also unique at my country and I haven’t smelled anyone wearing this fragrance yet.

  46. :

    3 out of 5

    Like fruit in a bottle. It smells like lolita lempicka when they try to come up with a people pleaser.

  47. :

    5 out of 5

    I gotten my sample from a helpful SA when i purchased a Catier fragrance. It was a generous sample, 7.5ml to be exact. I like Lolita Lempicka, naturally i thought L’eau Jolie is going the same direction as the rest. I was wrong. This is not your typical Lolita Lempicka, this is her younger, fresher sister.
    When i smell it for the first time, i think it smells very familiar and it struck me when i wore it. L’eau Jolie resembles the discountined moonflower from The Body Shop. This is a tad sweet and a stronger floral presence, a little of Eli Saab and Eternity Moments also. It wears quite well on me, lasted about 3 to 4 hours. Peronally, i would not purchase a full bottle as i do not see myself reaching for it often enough. If i were 10 years younger, then yes i would consider a bottle. It is a simple nice fragrance though, something one can consider for summer day wear.

  48. :

    3 out of 5

    I loved the beginning of this scent – agree with Water Is Life about that floral scent in a flower shop – it was a nice crisp mixture of everything in there, very pleasant. After about 30 mins, on my skin, it becomes very ordinary and smells like nothing in particular – just sweet and not captivating or attractive at all.
    I adore that little bottle, though.

  49. :

    4 out of 5

    Actually i adore Lolita Lempicka since i smell their original male 10+ years ago (yeah, u can see that it is in my love list) and i always run to test new one as soon as i heard they publish the new fragrance. But i’m hesitate to try this scent coz i feel neutral or disappoint in their recent juices ; Si, coral, fleur defendue, l eau en blanc BUT i’m wrong.
    This one dont have Licorice signature scent but it still pretty good. i didnt see in note list but when i smell it, i think of jasmine tea and It smell better than L’occitane jasmine green tea that i took 2 years to found and own it. Soft & pretty. i like!

  50. :

    4 out of 5

    Just got this today, a bit of a blind buy, since I haven’t actually tried this in any form. I’ve had encounters with previous Lolita Lempicka perfumes, and each one ended in disaster. Their signature “underscent” that is somewhat creamy-salty-licorice has always been a huge turnoff for me…but after repeated reviews talking about how Jolie is NOT the typical Lolita Lempicka (maybe odd one out of the family?), I decided to take the Leap of Faith.
    It paid. Marvelously, too! Thank you all you awesome gals who reviewed on here about it! I would have hesitated and missed this gem! I only wish I got the bigger bottle, but then again…great things come in little packages, and this gem is precious exactly because it’s so petite, and the amount so little!
    I have to say, though, before anything else, that my skin tends to be a “warm” base…it takes too easily to bases like amber, vanilla, musk, sandalwood, and coconut. So my skin tends to like to amplify these scents whenever they’re in a fragrance, to the point where it kills the scent and I just smell like I over applied body lotion or something. 🙁
    Ok! Gratitude, gushing, and griping aside, time for the fragrance itself! When I first applied it, there was definitely a delicate, floral scent. Sort of like how it smells like when you walk into a flower shop, or as extrasensorype points out, “graveyard flowers”. It’s not by any means unpleasant, but a fresh kind of floral. Not heavy, or green, or white, just…fresh floral. 🙂
    A minute or so later, the fruit notes come in, but they are also very fresh and juicy, in a fresh-out-of-the-juicer/blender kind of way. Very natural and light, and the pear, though juicy, is not overbearing. The Nashi pear, with is slightly floral smell, pairs well with the peach blossom, and tones down black currant to give the frag a nice, fruity smell that isn’t in-your-face or too sickeningly sweet. LOVE!

  51. :

    4 out of 5

    The smell reminds me of japanese tea. It is really soft, not sure about the longevity. I liked it, but not enough to buy it, at least not right now.

  52. :

    5 out of 5

    My first impressions on this perfume is that I very much dislike the opening, it’s so synthetic in a really bad way.
    Luckily, the opening isn’t too long (20 min) and it’s mysterious, chalky and pretty. I’m unable to distinguish any notes except the pear.
    Projects arm length and last about in between moderate and long lasting. By the way, I’m virgin to any other perfume of Lolita Lempicka. This is the first one I’ve ever owned and smelled. Excuse my inappropriate earlier comment.

  53. :

    3 out of 5

    Literally smells like a DKNY be delicious copy fragrance. Id buy this over BD because the flacon is gorgeous! But the tester I had might have been a bit old because there is also a scary off note coming through – if I had to wear this or BD it would come down to the longevity and how the fragrance develops. If the longevity is the same, it would come down to preference of which bottle I liked more. Sadly this one lost me the moment I tried it due to its copy cat nature.

  54. :

    3 out of 5

    Not sure about this one as it doesn’t appear to have the Lolita signature ‘underscent.’
    It rather reminds me of ‘graveyard flowers’ which is reminiscent of Petale Noir from AP which I gave to my mum. I may persevere but I will have to be in a particular mood.

  55. :

    4 out of 5

    This is a very pretty, light scent. I tried it yesterday and I remember it being a sweet floral at first. Plain and simple, but very pleasant. The dry down however, was a little too powdery and soapy smelling for my tastes, but overall this perfume is quite nice. Also, I must have one of these precious bottles one day!

  56. :

    4 out of 5

    I hope this is a fruity one with sweetness to it I’m really into the frutiy scents The bottle is beautiful

  57. :

    5 out of 5

    I prefer this younger sister to the the original older sister fragrance as it is more fresh and doesnt have that liquorice note that I just cannot stand. It includes my favourite floral/woody/aquatic notes with some fruitiness. The bottle is so cute as well!

  58. :

    4 out of 5

    I must admit I do love this despite its simplicity. I was surprised to stumble across this at my local store so I just HAD to try it. When I think of Lolita Lempicka perfume, I think of heavy licorice and sweetness. L’Eau Jolie keeps the sweet, but is definitely not heavy in the slightest. Crisp, fresh, and feminine, I find it’s the complete opposite of the original Lolita Lempicka. And I absolutely adore it.

  59. :

    3 out of 5

    L’Eau Jolie is likely a (not much older) aunt of the original Lolita Lempicka Eau De Parfum. Aunt Jolie is rumored to be just as much of a sprite, imp, and general gossip as her niece, but she just never gets caught? 😛

  60. :

    3 out of 5

    I purchased some samples of this and was excited to try it. While I’ve always loved perfumes I’ve been more of a casual buyer and I’m new to the perfumista world. I’ve been trying as many samples as I can so as to discover what I like and don’t like, what the different categories mean, etc.
    I’m learning that fruity florals, if they don’t have a strong spicy or woody note to balance them, usually aren’t my thing. This does have a strong musky note that becomes more intense as it dries down, but it still smells juicy, light and sweet. It’s very pleasant, it’s just not for me. There’s a fresh, aquatic quality to it that keeps the musk from warming it up and I’d prefer it to be warmer, more like skin and less like a spritz. I LOVE Lolita Lempicka’s L’eau en Blanc which is also light and fruity, but has a base and a powdery quality that makes it more of a comfort scent.
    I’m 30 and it feels a little young to me. I could give it to one of the teenage girls in our youth group without worrying about ruffling their parents’ feathers.
    It’s worth trying if the above qualities are what you’re looking for because it is nice. I’d like to smell it on someone else. But I doubt I’ll repurchase after using up my samples.
    Oh, and the pear note is VERY strong and distinctive even to a newbie. If you like pear, you’ll probably love it. If not, be warned.

  61. :

    5 out of 5

    I have to admit that I bought this one just to have one of those precious little bottles… Anyway, it smells nice and close to the skin. Not a masterpiece or a terribly sensual scent but suitable to wear in spring/summer.

  62. :

    4 out of 5

    It is the perfume of the forest fairies. Feminine, romantic, enchanting, unique and special.
    Contains magical mystique.
    In my case, lolita lempicka fragrances, I find too sweet and dark, I tend to like lighter scents, so I’ve always stayed away from them, but with this new version I’m in luck because it is lighter, more right for me.
    I’ve finally fallen into the charms of Lolita Lempicka.
    Longevity: 8/10
    Sillage: 7/10
    ******
    Es el perfume de las hadas del bosque. Femenino, romántico, encantador, único y especial.
    Contiene un halo de misterio mágico.
    En mi caso, los perfumes de lolita lempicka, me resultan demasiado dulces y oscuros, me suelen gustar los perfumes más ligeros, asi que siempre me he mantenido apartada de ellos, pero con esta nueva versión estoy de enhorabuena porque éste es más ligero, más adecuado para mí.
    Por fin he caído en los encantos de Lolita Lempicka.
    Longevidad: 7/10
    Sillage: 7/10

  63. :

    3 out of 5

    When I am opening Lolita Lempicka’s perfume boxes, I imagine Christine Daae ( from “The Phantom of the opera”) discovering the musical box (with that monkey on the top). They all are so sophisticated and creative.
    The perfume is nothing like traditional Lempicka’s creations, it’s radiant, sparkling, bright and sunny. Black Currant makes it rich and sensually deep, pear makes my mouth water, flower bouquet in my hands makes me smile, neroli turns men’s heads and finally the musk leaves me in a transparent, dazzling, coquettish veil of fragrance. A very feminine, unique and classy scent for seduction and love.

  64. :

    3 out of 5

    Krásná vůně na léto, super ovocno-květinový koktejl.

  65. :

    5 out of 5

    Very juicy, less “sweetie” than other Lolita Lempicka, and fresh. A good surprise : I was afraid to smell a new “Morsure d’amour”. Pear and musk are very present, it’s delicate and feminine, very “Miss”. I immediately purchased it ! Perfect for spring and summer. Correct lasting power.

  66. :

    5 out of 5

    I finally had the time to try my sample and it was nothing that I would have expected from Lolita Lempicka. My experience with her creations has always been edgy, abrupt (in a good way), a true grand entrance. L’Eau Jolie is by far the “well behaved” sister. She is fresh, and full of inner sunshine. At first the black current comes on as a solo act but soon the musk joins in and “mellows” the journey. This was within the first 10-15 minutes. The peach blossom is almost not detectable, as if the musk is trying to calm an already mellow t

L’Eau Jolie Lolita Lempicka

Add a review

About Lolita Lempicka