Geoffrey Beene Geoffrey Beene

3.64 из 5
(11 отзывов)

Geoffrey Beene Geoffrey Beene

Geoffrey Beene Geoffrey Beene

Rated 3.64 out of 5 based on 11 customer ratings
(11 customer reviews)

Geoffrey Beene Geoffrey Beene for women of Geoffrey Beene

SKU:  0b7909f82bfd Perfume Category:  . Fragrance Brand: Notes:  , , , , , , , , , , .
Share:

Description

Geoffrey Beene by Geoffrey Beene is a Floral fragrance for women. Geoffrey Beene was launched in 1998. Geoffrey Beene was created by Michel Gouges and Ron Winnegrad. Top notes are coriander, green notes and bergamot; middle notes are violet, jasmine, rose and geranium; base notes are sandalwood, musk, civet and oakmoss.

11 reviews for Geoffrey Beene Geoffrey Beene

  1. :

    3 out of 5

    Beautiful!!! I adore this, gorgeous green, woodsy, floral, divine roses and lovely geranium, animalic warm and alluring fragrance!!! It’s beautiful, and goes on and on! It’s so attractive and feminine. So classy and enticing!!! And the bottle is absolutely gorgeous!!

  2. :

    4 out of 5

    i like it but not really in love with this one
    this is an oakmoss monster
    there are sweetness vibes hidden inside
    but no like ungaro diva
    the oakmoss is so string that makes this fragrance s bit smelly and too green.
    the first several sprays are intolerable, but afte about 10 minutes it settles down to a very calm and old-style scent.
    if you like vintage scent this is definitely a must-try
    bought it like &8 for 30ml
    7/10 points for this one

  3. :

    3 out of 5

    What does it smells like?Hmm…,very unusual,indeed.The first opening smells very green and almost musty cocophpny of all botanical plants with their leaves and flowers in some exotical greenhouse somethere .The note of coriander sounds like the most prominent one ,but oakmoss and civet trades in too and I can smell some sweet almost organic chocolady note ,which I find is truly strange one in this composition.I would describe this smell like green and sweet,not fresh or alluring,more musky and flowery ,not my very favorite category,but very long lasting and feminish ,interesting smell…Maybe more of winter perfume,in my opinion…
    I have 7,5 ml bottle Parfum of this little wonder

  4. :

    5 out of 5

    I am really surprised by all the negative reviews of this perfume!! I cannot understand what note or combination of notes has caused this overwhelming negativity because on me this is a very lovely scent with a bit of something in it that attracted me from the start!
    I have still not learned to distinguish separate notes and to be honest, it isn’t high on my list of priorities other than knowing which ones I like most. Thus, I don’t know what ingredient is so attractive to my nose. Perhaps it is the civet/oakmoss combination? Since this was a blind buy, I didn’t even know that those were part of the composition.
    So I am pondering two issues that might actually be the same one – what is it that is so alluring to me and what is it that is so horrible for others? Are they one and the same thing?

  5. :

    4 out of 5

    My aunt gave this to me in a hurry. I had no idea why until I sprayed it. I was so repulsed I almost vomited and was left with a headache for the rest of the day. This just did not agree with me AT ALL.

  6. :

    4 out of 5

    When I saw a good deal on 100 ml of this one, I decided to take a chance on it. One reason is that two reviewers on two different sites thought it came across as somewhat “masculine” (one was a woman and one was a man). It certainly doesn’t have a strong floral element, other than the violet, which is more like violet leaf, actually. I didn’t detect any strong galbanum, so I’m wondering if green notes and violet were listed instead of violet leaf because some women think violet leaf is too “masculine” for them.
    Anyway, another reason I was interested in this one concerns the different impressions. Some say it’s too “dirty” or “musty,” others that it is too sweet, and another that it was a great scent for a businesswoman (I think still others said it was soapy or rough). This kind of variation in the reviews always intrigues me. So what do we have here? What I consider to be violet leaf is a bit strong for a while, though not as strong as in some “men’s” fragrances (and it lasts a long time too). The bergamot is obvious, and with coriander and oakmoss kicking around, it has that “bug spray” or “hairspray” effect, not that I view it that way any more, now that I understand and can detect the notes.
    What I want after a short period of time is decent note separation, and while it’s not great here (which may have been the perfumer’s intention), it’s not bad either. I can detect most of the notes, though they do tend to bunch up for the most part. It’s a bit dry, but there is no issue with it smelling “synthetic,” thank goodness. Though musk is listed, I don’t consider this a musky fragrance. The sandalwood note is clear but not especially strong. And the civet note seems to be quite subdued. I don’t get much jasmine but the rose is noticeable, though in the background for most of the time.
    No. 19 (I have a vintage EdC), by comparison, is richer and the floral notes are stronger. It also has a more distinct and “clean” feel. This doesn’t make Geoffrey Beene “bad” (the perfume, not the man LOL), but I think it’s an out-of-fashion kind of scent these days, and some might call it a “grandma perfume.” For me, the important question is, does the fragrance have value to the aficionado? While I don’t think there is any need for variations on this theme, I do think having this one fragrance (of this type) is worthwhile if you like variety. There is enough note separation, naturalness, dynamism, and note contrast. It’s also fairly well balanced, though not all aficionados seek this attribute.
    UPDATE: 12 hours after application and it’s still present. Basically, this comes together after a few hours and then stays that way. The oakmoss and bergamot seem to be quite strong, while the floral elements are not. There is a kind of fruity quality too, probably due to the coriander and something else providing some sweetness (vanilla/amber/benzoin/etc.?). The closest masculine fragrance I can think of is Worth Pour Homme Haute Concentration (comparing drydowns only). I’m not sure if this is worthy of being in my rotation but I’ll give it a full wearing at some point and update again.

  7. :

    3 out of 5

    It is sweet and this sweetiness remains for all 4-5 hours on me (used EdT). It is really a pity that nobody noticed this sweet note which I unfortunately don’t like at all.

  8. :

    4 out of 5

    Unfortunately I found this one offensive. I don’t know if it’s just too blokey or what, but it’s just so ‘rough’ and unfeminine. It took my breath away – for all of the wrong reasons. Maybe this one needs to be revamped, repackaged and reformulated.

  9. :

    3 out of 5

    Maybe the one I have bought is old and hasn’t been stored carefully, but I do not like this fragrance at all. It turned sour on my skin almost immediately. At first I thought it may have been the citrus opening but it just got older and dustier until I was left with a rancid musty old upholstery smell. It was very disappointing but as I said , maybe it’s not the true fragrance it should be in its fresh state.

  10. :

    3 out of 5

    I CANNOT STAND THIS SCENT!!!! ITS AWFUL!!! I do not know what it is that my nose just wants to run for the hills with this stuff. I bought two bottles and gave it away to anyone who was dumb enough to take it!

  11. :

    4 out of 5

    A truly great scent for office and day to day use. Something well tailored and professional about this one from the coriander opening, the rose and geranium breeziness in the heart and the animalic oopmph in the base it gives off a competant competitive vibe.
    I stocked up on this in the EDT and the parfum. It is my gabardine suit scent.

Geoffrey Beene Geoffrey Beene

Add a review

About Geoffrey Beene