To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Sasha8480 – :
Quite unusual scent, starts with a blast of balsamic (styrax)-leather combo with touch of lavender. I am sure not everyone would appreciate it but after half an hour becomes very pleasant vanila-leather scent that reminds me of current, dilluted Dior Homme Intense (08666/A and 10950/A formulas)
I got Cuero quite cheap – 15 euro/50ml so overall this is 8/10 for me 🙂
hawka – :
Cuero opens with a spicy leather that is a bit sharp on the edges with a fresh touch. A herbal bouquet runs through the background of the fragrance, giving it a classy touch. Spicy and dry at first, starts to sweeten as it goes into the dry down, which is a soft processed leather with some sweetness.
Nice overall, but the composition lacks a certain “richness” that it could have been achieved.
6.5/10