To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Евгений1975 – :
Okay… it’s not bad. The opening is purely terrible but it dries down to an unrealistic aquatic rose. The marjoram is cool, though. Overall a dislike. Overrated imho
Gypefrure – :
Now THIS one I like! Up until this point I’ve been really disappointed with this brand. Some hope has been restored.
This is a cool crisp and beautiful rose perfume. I even detect something a bit minty. It’s quite gorgeous. It’s a light airy rose that feels very real and even a bit “stemmy”. The marjoram is subtle but gives this a lovely tinge of greenery which stops it being a regular powdery rose we’ve smelled a million times before.
It feels contemporary and I like that a lot! It’s got a nice amount of throw too whereas everything else I’ve smelled before this has disappeared within about 10 minutes.
Completely unisex and a glorious take on roses. Like I said..this feels very real, crisp natural tones that roses have have been captured here. The aquatic tones just compliment everything perfectly too.
Having said all of that, I still wouldn’t spent the huge amount this company charges for their perfumes.
agent5339 – :
A disclaimer: I tested this line in the store both on testing strips as well as on skin (for some of them), but because I don’t have samples to study in more detail, this is more of a snapshot than a fully fledged analytical review. I usually spend quite a bit more time with scents before I cobble together my thoughts, so do with it what you will.
Pretty much does what it says on tin. This is a vivid, articulate rose—one that seems to be based on an extremely high-quality material, but one that would ordinarily read as bitter and stemmy. This scent has been given a fully-fledged rose headspace, meaning that the more damascone-type effect that people associate with rose has been considered. It’s slightly sweetened up top by some orange and (what I believe to be) another floral note altogether—a white floral, it seems.
I didn’t wear this, only smelled it on the blotter enough to get good sense of what it’s doing. And it’s really just doing rose, albeit well. You’re paying for the hydro-distilled rose here—a material that costs upwards of $50 per ml. While sandalwood isn’t cheap either, it’s not immediately noticeable in this composition, and I didn’t give it a chance to reveal itself fully. For as much as I’d like to congratulate its rosy accomplishments, I simply can’t see why a person looking for a good, vivid rose wouldn’t look elsewhere and find comparable quality for a fraction of the price.
dimonaff – :
not sure i feel as strongly as wiegley does about this scent – but i only bought a 0.5ml decant for a few bucks. i do not find the drydown to be problematic – but i do find it to be rather generic. i won’t mark it as “dislike” but i won’t mark it as “like” either. it just kind of is what it is. there are dozens of vastly superior rose juices on the market, so being unable to differentiate your juice is about the same as not bothering to produce it in the first place. ymmv, of course.
ota09 – :
I spent an absolute fortune on this ($250 or so) and regretted it immediately. While it smells great in the bottle, the drydown is very medicinal and gave me a nauseating headache. The store does not allow returns so I’m stuck with it. Sigh!