To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
filaret – :
A sweet tuberose jasmine. Opens with a flesh dirty rose that reminds me to Penhaligons Hammam’s Bouquet and settles very quick into a rather lineal sweet, musky rose Tuberose.Has that rose citronella edge bubbling around. Great projection and my fab Tuberose so far.
Aubrey_fromAA – :
Although it’s made of disparate notes, it harmonizes into a spicy, vegetal masculine fragrance that is quite nice. Something you could wear every day. Sillage and longevity leave something to be desired. Old school with a new vibe.
Encactapype – :
This is not a fougère but a chypre – a quite floral chypre I have to admit. XPEC Original ia damn similar to No 88 by Czech & Speake but less dark and more dark room. Where No 88 is for wankers, XPEC Original is for dark room visitors because the first has the aura of loneliness whereas XPEC is for the sociable. The similarity is astonishing because the notes are quite different; I presume there is incense in No. 88 making it more balsamic than XPEC Original. But both scents have been composed by Shirley Brody (definetley, the specification of John Stephen being the nose behind No. 88 is wrong) and both are voluptuous. In my opinion XPEC is slightly better because of its superior spiciness. Brilliant!