To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
dgolf – :
28. january.2015
Cindy Crawford fragrances are actually really good ones. To me they have quite a personality and i highly recommend them, if you can find them. I have managed to find a remaining stock of “waterfalls” in one shop and bought last 3 bottles of it and i don´t regret at all! For a very fair price (unlike they charge on ebay for them) i have recieved a quality fragrance, composed by a famous nose, it´s Mark Buxton after all, a master himself!
The scent of waterfalls is very aquatic, however it has a very pronounced note of pepper in it. It is airy (but with noticeable sillage), very refreshing, in spite of pepper. The whole composition is actually perfect, it has something in common with a Bulgari´s “the au rouge” in the opening, cause the pepper and apple combo is not sweet at all. Later, when it warms on your skin, it becomes bit more flowery, with flower notes becomeing more accented. The drydown is nice as well: woody, bit aquatic and non-disturbing, without a chemical aftersmell.
The whole composition developes just like a day near the waterfall: the openig is the cool morning, the middle stge is a warm day, the drydown is the evening. Just like a small life circle.
I do believe it is a lighter and more flowery version of the original Cindy Crawford fragrance, which i also enjoy and which is not bad at all. Very good for the summer and even autumn. Do not overlook it, because of the brand, do try it!
Edo001 – :
This was beautiful and amazing, very well made perfume. I`m sad that this is no more to get here in germany.Was so fantastic……..
prker33 – :
Wow! Individuality and pepper 🙂 that’s what I feel. It’s cold smell, very refreshing! Love pepper parfumes! I feel the citrusses and cedar too. Reminds me of Nina Ricci Premier Jour.In the drydown becoming more sweet.. and something strange – I feel the smell of green tea teabag, maybe it’s from cassia.
ViktorZ – :
This was my first perfume. Love it! so fresh and feminine! but its not on the market anymoore, not even shops on internet or ebay, and ebay has scents that are discontinued. I was lucky to find it in Norway, random girl sold it to me:))))
bobosers – :
For me this is the smell of cedar pencil shavings with fruity background and I love it. I only wish it was easier to get in my country. Or maybe it was discontinued?
tiqlljsjhdh – :
It smells first strong citruses mixed with freesia, then, in the base, cedar. This is a nice perfume, with reasonable staying power. I find similarities with the sportive-class perfumes. It is a fresh, casual fragrance, definitely for daytime.
sernov – :
Wow! the perfume mathes the name! So fresh and charming. It does make me think of a waterfall. I think everyone will like this scent. A safe choice if your buying it for a gift.
Mefoa604bedyWelty – :
This one is just so boring. Flowers, flowers, flowers makes this one too sweet and I don´t think it´s fresh enough. Somewhere I can feel how the lightliness wants to become aquatic but then all the flowers comes and just drench it all.
But yes, I would say it´s a feminine scent and very safe but come on, there are so many better scents out there not even this one should be a choice if you want to pass by unnoticed.
baikonur6 – :
It’s the “lighter” and “fresher” version of the original Cindy Crawford scent, which wasn’t really bad at all.
This one, however, has an annoying unfinished feeling to it. It is light but a tad too light. Fresh, but sort of “tired-fresh” rather than “totally fresh”.
Wouldn’t rush into the store looking for it.