To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
guide2000 – :
Wonderful smell, but performance issues mean that I can’t take it seriously in this competitive market.
sody – :
Despite sharing the same iconic bottle and cheap sticker label, it smells nothing like Aramis Classic or any of the recent editions. Voyager smells sweet and manly with a fresh medicinal edge that thankfully doesn’t evolve too much. But performance is seriously annoying, with useless longevity of 1-2 hours max and no projection beyond the first 15 mins. Much as I love the house of Aramis, I think I would have preferred to buy YSL Body Kouros which as has already been pointed out smells much like Voyager, but with much superior performance. Given its performance issues, it was overpriced, and God help those who bought it at full price (£62+), now it has deservedly ended up at the discounters only a year or two later. IMHO, if it weren’t for its performance, it would have been a great one…(sigh)
kenkosd – :
Very soft scent. Holds just enough to register it and then it’s gone. I had to push five times, but it dissipates as you see a rocket go into the space. The odd thing is that it radiates in such a cunning way, that you don’t notice it, but once you get moving, it hits you, and yes, it is quite nice, because I thought it was gone and then it actually was not. So there. Is it an exciting perfume? Well, I would guess not, but it is not boring either. Anyway, this is my first Aramis, so I reckon there are better ones. I give it a 6 out of 10.
rianfs – :
This one is pure gold! I dont get why these negative people knock nice fragrances like this. This is a great one by Aramis! I give this an 8.8/10.
21vek – :
i love this cologne.it is so different than anything i got.a mild cross between la male and dreamer both of which were too loud for me.its minty a bit and very nice but it is somewhat weak.
maxim19041989 – :
Tested this today at a fragrance counter, I’m actually surprised that Aramis (who are my favourite brand btw) put their name to this, so weak and nondescript from a house that has a proud lineage of strong masculine fragrances.
I took a blotter with me as well, it’s so weak you have to literally put your nose to it to pick it up.
Not impressed
Scorpion90 – :
I wish Aramis would stop makin frags to pleez the younger crowd. Keep it real Aramis!
Prick – :
I got a bottle of this as it was offered to me cheap and I’m thankful I never paid full price.
First spray is very spicy dominated by Black Pepper.
As it settles it becomes more tolerable and pleasant but by that time there is hardly any scent left. Weak longevity and soft sillage.
elema – :
TRENDY, SWEET, BALSAMIC AND LINEAR. IN A WORD, BORING.
SILLAGE AND LONGEVITY ARE LOW.
tangar8 – :
SMELLS LIKE BODY KOUROS.
AGAIN, THESE PEOPLE ARE RECKING THE BRAND.
WHY SELL THIS SH´T TO PEOPLE?
Bleatsskasife – :
No mercy for (Water-Scents)! Thumbs Down!
glinmn – :
I knew nothing about this release and it turned out to be something I hadn’t expected from Aramis…but perhaps should’ve done. No brand is too precious to jump on a trendy bandwagon and this is what Aramis have done here and maybe with flankers like adventurer and black so as I say…it was half expected. The opening is straight away identifiable as tonka bean, so I guess that’s something and it’s that synthetic, dirty, heavy vanilla chemistry that runs right through the experience. Lavender actually compliments Tonka well and there’s a hint of that combo in Voyager. Look…this is normally something I’d say I don’t like, I’m not into designer, gourmand, tonka fragrances as a rule but after the harshness and clunkiness of the opening and first hour or two it becomes a subdued, skin scent which to me is quite inoffensive. I’m more tolerant than I used to be but this isn’t good…I’ll pass.
eagerycle – :
Tested in Boots; very soft presence on the tester strip (virtually non-existent) – was in the store 30 minutes and by the time I left the scent was gone. Not sure what’s up with Aramis, but this and adventurer have been very poor additions to the ‘usually’ rock-steady house. Hopefully the tester bottle was duff…. 🙁
Lypedanydrini – :
I don’t get it, how ppl can vote fragrance w/o even the smell of it ?? Thats stupid..