To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
petriga – :
No, thank you !
Too feminine. Too sweet.
It smells cheap.
Fodychock – :
I’ve just add the new edition from 2018, so you can review it separately 😉
anton_472 – :
Can we get a separate listing for the 2018 edition?.
The juices are completely different and the newer reviews are diluting the reviews of this 2016 edition.
miwkagammy – :
I’ve been today in Zara store,to see what is that hype all about…well,it’s about nothing!Guys,(and girls)save your money,or you dont have to,it’s only 15€,so you won’t loose much,but why loose anything, when you don’t need to…It’s girly scent,I wouldn’t wear it,and it’s too sweet,reminds me of some bad smelling women’s perfume…really bad and cheap…I blind bought Vibrant leather,but that is whole another game,nothing to comapare with this one.So,the advice is not to blind buy,for sure,and the hype is for nothing.Avoid.
murat – :
I wouldn’t wear this, even if it is very sensual, soft and inviting. It is a unisex scent to the fullest. Enjoyable? On a woman.
moloko – :
This is WOW!
It’s a creamy, sweet tobacco that makes you feel like a gentle massage on the back of your neck when you smell it. That is the best way I can describe it. I find it suitable for dark suit occasions.
The longevity is impressive – It stays on until I wash it off and projects, discreetly, up to 6 hours or more.
One of the best quality/price rations!
agn7203 – :
This smells like those chocolate scented candles that they used to have at IKEA. So if you liked those, you will like this.
Completely unisex in my opinion.
Exhabberb – :
The 2018 version.
I had the 2016 version but lost it during traveling. From what I remember, and comparing it to the 2018 version, I’d say they’re 80% identical, just seems like honey note has been amped up a bit and the coconut note is a bit on the background… many they took into account the complaints about it being too fem? I much prefer this version. Make no mistake, it is still very sweet, but you smell the coconut a bit less.
The heavier honey note brought another issue though : nose fatigue. Honey seems extremely tiring to the nose from my experience. I have the same issue with Pure Havane … I almost can’t smell it after half an hour. So I can’t comment on the projection/sillage but when l stick my nose, I can smell it up til 7-8h. For the 13 Europe price, it is really good.. does’t Have that drugstore fragrance smell you’d expect from a perfume at this price range, even at double that price it would still worth it.
8/10
PS : it hasn’t been discuted, but the presentation is very good! From the box to the bottle and one of the best sprayers in my collection (Dior Homme level here).
lld200bedyWelty – :
So what you guys are saying, that newly re-released RWA in the same bottles are now tweaked, slightly changed as a scent?
Maybe Tone Indeterminee got re-released too as a different scent?
Let me know via PM. Thanks.
Menug337Bessinepome – :
2018 version. The boys below are right on point. The opening is super boozy. It’s rum mixed with honey, tobacco,vanilla and a little bit of coconut vibe. When i first sprayed it I couldn’t believe it is a 13 euro fragrance.
It smells very pleasant, sweet but not overly sweet, it’s very well balanced. In the drydown, the boozy accord takes the back seat and honey+tobacco+coconut takes the wheel. Still very good, but the opening is just fantastic.
I haven’t tested out the longevity yet, but I can already say that this is not really long lasting, it’s in the 4-6 hours range.
Ярослав1996 – :
I never got to try the 2016 version but did manage to pick the new version up and i totally agree with the reviewer below. This reminds me of burberry london in the mid stage minus the spicey notes that give it that christmasy vibe which is good as i can really seperate the notes and appreciate the tobacco note. It projects nicely for about 3 to 4 hours then sits a lot closer to the skin giving of wafts of tobacco, which is done really well, smells like a very genuine pipe tobacco with a honey and almond smell, lasted a good 12 hours. For the price you cant go wrong and im gonna pick up a back up plus the other one in the tobacco collection while they have it in stock, well done Zara.
WeeptzotGence – :
New and improved for 2018.
Rum, white peony and vanilla bourbon – according to the official website. Just picked up a bottle yesterday. The 2016 version was a way too sweet and fem for me, but the reform is amazing IMO. A friggin awesome fall and winter scent and perhaps the ultimate embodiment of Valentine’s Day.
Think wine-soaked chocolate and vanilla. Sexxxy. Perhaps the younger brother of Black Vanilla Absolute from Perry Ellis, but without the oud. Maybe even a distant cousin of Burberry London.
Super duper boozy off the top. Slightly more masculine (although still quite unisex) but with less sweetness, no coconut lotion vibe this time, and with 8 hours plus performance. Yeah, I’d say that’s a win.
hef023Bessinepome – :
Oh no, no ,no… this is not for me. While the quality is very good, and for the price outstanding, the scent is a sweet cloying mess. It smells of coconut, honey, and some kind of cooking toffee. Imaging going past an old fashioned candy shop (the ones where they spin toffee on a machine in the window), and where there are a myriad of other mixed sweet smells emanating from the kitchen. It is a summer day, and the person next to you is slathered in coconut suntan oil. The combo of scents is what this smells like. It lasts for hours, and actually seems to go on thick. It is an instant scrubber for me..
Its partner however (intense, dark, exclusive) is awesome though…
kavkaz99 – :
I think people that call Zara’s Tobacco Collection Rich Warm Addictive an ‘amazing beautiful masterpiece’ have been sniffing something a little less legal.
I was curious about this fragrance due to the hype, and finally it returned to the UK.
Zara’s Tobacco Collection Rich Warm Addictive is not ‘cheap’; it is inexpensive. Cheap implies poor quality, and this is a good quality fragrance. For the price it is a bargain, as long as you like the smell of course.
The dominant notes are the coconut and honey. That makes for a sweet, gourmand fragrance that I would describe as ‘playful’. The tobacco supports those notes but isn’t something that is immediately noticeable. I am considering buying the twin pack with the ‘dark intense’ version as it’s a very good price right now.
The projection and longevity are poor for me, but at the price reapplying isn’t a big deal. Unlike the vast majority of blind buys I’ve made, I like this one.
KingOfBeer – :
Amazing beautiful masterpiece. Refined, seductive, perfect unisex fragrance. Would pay quadruple the price, and still buy two back up bottles. Cocaine water
link31390 – :
Zara are fooling people again, on their website the notes of RWA are different….I was go to a zara store to smell the “new” RWA and BUUMMM is the same fragrance that i had smelled last year lol, i prefer Intense Dark.
This is too femenine for my taste,all the hype around this its crazy because its a good fragrance,but nothing special.
ToveSpoof – :
The notes are completely changed in 2018 version
kagren – :
Today I noticed they brought it back.
It’s available again on the Zara website, bought it in a twin pack together with Intense Dark
kolanino – :
Zara’s 2016 Tobacco Collection, specifically, Rich/Warm/Addictive, was atop the hype train of the northern hemisphere winter 2016-17 season, the characteristic quick scarceness of which prompted prices to escalate from the retail $20 (maybe $30) to multiples of that.
I never saw it in my relatively small local store at the time but acquired it secondhand and found it to be quite a nice fragrance, a neat entry in the “sweet tobacco” subgenre.
The combination of tobacco, coconut, and honey provides something different from most of what I see on the market, the coconut specifically creating an unapologetic sweetness, albeit synthetic, that still works very effectively against the tobacco and woods, with honey cementing the fragrance’s status as sugary sweet, a far reach from an actually tobacco-dominant scent.
Performance is decent, moderate on projection and longevity, but in fairness, for their prices, that is all one can expect of even a more cold-weather-leaning Zara scent.
The use RWA for me is primarily casual wear, but it’s inoffensive enough to wear to the office or even in warm weather.
7 out of 10
and-758 – :
The name says it all. This is such a seductively sweet scent on my skin. The initial blast is a bomb of honey and coconut and it eventually tones its sweetness down a bit and introduces a deep and rich pipe tobacco in the mix. The composition comes across (on my skin and to my nose) as a similar vibe to Salvatore Ferragamo Uomo, BUT Rich Warm Addictive is not as “harsh” as Uomo can sometimes be. Like a dark, rich, honeyed chocolate, this is an amazing scent for the fall and winter seasons. An excellent date scent or something to throw on with a great suit for a formal occasion, this will get you noticed and your lady will cuddle up with you as well.
Speaking of ladies, this fragrance does trend a bit feminine because of the honeyed sweetness, so women might be able to rock this one as well. Also, a young gentleman or a seasoned professional can both wear this one and be fine. However, when you do spray, take it a bit easy on the trigger as over-spraying may cause a bit of “honey fatigue” to your nose, lol.
Overall, Zara’s Rich Warm Addictive is a sweet, alluring scent that re-analyzes what other fragrance houses have tried to do (ala Rochas Man and Valentino Uomo, for example) and gives you a scent profile that is sure to turn heads.
Easily a 4.5 out of 5 stars from me!
Stay classy, ladies and gentlemen!
Lodochnik – :
Not sure why all this hate, I’m enjoying this very much. It lasts very long and develops very nicely..ends off with a soft vanilla that’s exudes calm and complexity at the same time. The price alone is enough to warrant a purchase and I’m sure glad I did! Don’t wear it expecting a rich tobacco kind of scent, it’s more vanilla than anything. Could have named it Vanilla Collection instead..haha
bosota – :
When the bottle feels like it used up 90% of the production cost, beware.
This smells like it belongs in a cheap candle.
No tobacco, just highly synthetic coconut and and a honey/vanilla thing in the base.
Save your money and get Pure Havane or Spicebomb Extreme for a proper tobacco fragrance.
Gordsha-76 – :
I get mostly tobacco, bourbon vanilla, coconut. I tried it in late summer and hated it, seemed very masculine, thought it would be great on a man. I re-tried it in winter and loved it, totally unisex. Perfect on a winter’s day for feeling cozy.
DrJekyll – :
I really like this much better than herod.
I have both and I much prefer this over Herod… Herod to me has something that smells a bit nauseating.. I much prefer this.
Also Herod lasts about 4 hours on me, and this lasts about 7 to 8 hours.. so is much better perfoming fragrance than herod
OrerdrorkTeby – :
reading the reviews brings home the fact that the same scent can smell, and last, differently on different people, and, as always, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. there has been a lot of hype surrounding this fragrance, and, in my opinion, it is well deserved. This is truly a rich, warm fragrance that you find yourself addictively smelling. The initial blast is a little alcoholic, but that lasts seconds. it quickly mellows into a rummy, coconut, honey vibe that a lot of people love..and others don’t..
Agree the tobacco isn’t strong and it smells “soft” -not necessarily feminine though – especially when compared to its partner in the collection, Intense Dark Exclusive which comes across a lot harder. Definitely not a summer scent, but can work during the rest of the seasons. Longevity on my skin is great.
Sergey_52rus – :
So it was back in stores?
joiliothe – :
Don’t know if there was a problem with the bottle but I tried it in a Zara store, I wanted to cut my hand and burn my jacket after 5 minutes.. sell my car after spending 5 minutes spreading that ‘scent’ inside… I cannot bear it, it would make the word nausea having nausea.
Oversweet, heavyGourmand, with the Zara synthetic touch pushed to faroverthemax.
Not my thing, like NOT AT ALL.
vovik82 – :
It is sweeter than sweet. It is TOO sweet to be a man’s fragrance, and too sickly sweet even for women. Headache and “toothache” inducing for sure. The coconut scent is beautiful, creamy and rich but again, too rich, too concentrate, and too heavy to be fresh and real. It is definitely a loud artificial scent. Can’t think of wearing it in hot summer. The honey in here actually backs fire the concept of this fragrance. I also could not detect any “tobacco” at all. I like many “girlie” perfumes (Victoria’s Secret kind of fragrance with sweetness and all), and I myself also love coconut fragrances but have to pass on this one. Don’t know if many men would actually enjoy wearing this. Not my man for sure 🙂
yuruk88 – :
its gourmandy, unisex definitely, but more on the feminine side. Would have loved it more if the tobacco note was more prominent. Lasts more than most other Zara perfumes. To me its more of a very decent perfume if not awesome, but for the price of course can be given a try.
nostlg – :
Yay! Thank you for your lovely reviews on this fragrance! I only discovered this when it popped up in the newest reviews on the right side of my screen. I just had to check it out! I visited four Zara stores in the last week and found it in the third one I visited. (Aside from a few staples, the selection in each store seems fairly random.) There were only two bottles left, and when I paid for one, I found out it was discounted too!
Just a quick review for now of my first impressions. I was almost disappointed because after reading about how sweet it is, honey and coconut, etc., I was greeted by a loud and spicy tobacco blast that was very masculine. (It also smelled extremely familiar, but I couldn’t put my finger where I’d smelled it before — maybe something Christmas, or a room fragrance, or a Christmas room fragrance.)
Thankfully, I’d learned not to judge a fragrance by the first spray, so I hovered around the men’s section while waiting for it to settle. Before it truly set, I asked a sales rep to save it for me and I would come back later for it. I then strolled over to the fourth Zara I visited, which was in the mall right next door and where I didn’t find this. By that time, mmmm, RWA smelled so cozy and yummy! Yes, I was definitely getting this!
I haven’t used it yet though, so I’ll try to write another review when I’ve gotten to know this a little more.
stenwest – :
My first impression of this fragrance is that the smell is dominated by sweet, vanilla, coconut and very little tobacco. It smelled a bit deep and heavy. I like the bottle, spray and cap design. But I don’t like the box design which makes me difficult to open it.
kesha – :
I was in the Zara store to buy a coat and it turned out that the perfumes were just next to the coats. So I decided to just spray a bit just for fun … I immediately recognized
this scent, I’ve smelled it many times and I was like … !!O_o!!, then I checked the price it is like 10 euros since there was a Christmas discount. So I bought it, later that day I got addicted. On the next day I went back to the store to buy some more, they were all gone … and here I am … checking the web to see what is the magic behind it (it looks like many ppl got hooked) and looking where to buy some more. Hope it won’t be my last bottle I just can’t get enough of it.
bop-zek – :
There’s a pretty clever juxtaposition here since coconut is something we usually associate with the tropics. Rich Warm and Addictive however, eventually leaves the beach and walks straight into the kitchen. It’s all coconut in the beginning, teetering dangerously close to sunscreen, but allow it to breathe and a chocolate vanilla cake will emerge. It’s nice, but a bit too cloying even for a gourmand guy like myself. Still I must salute Zara for giving the middle finger to the fragrance industry and offering full bottles at such amazing prices.
ipk105Unlogrere – :
One of my favorite Gourmands. And for those who don’t know what a gourmand is, it is a fragrance that smells like a desert and or savory dish. To sum this fragrance up, it is a sweet, coconut-like coffee fragrance, with an ever so soft tobacco note. Smells like a high designer fragrance that is 20 USD. It also lasts a nice 5-6 hour with a good hour projection. This can also be easily pulled off by a woman. I would find this quite sexy on a woman. Get this one before it gets too expensive.
stebl – :
Sweet coffee, sweet moist tobacco and strong coconut opening with wood and honey base for a very linear developpment. Simple effective gourmand formula!
Having said that, this fragrance is really addictive!
Average longevity, sillagge and projection.
Costed mw 12.5 Euros for 100 ml.
Quite unisex.
Quality? A LOT for 12.5 euros
Get a couple of bottles ASAP!
My rating: 8.25/10.00
Юлия Степанова – :
I was excited to try this one. Finally it was here in Colombia so i gave it a try. Didn’t like it, smells like a sun cream from my girlfriend. Also reminded me a little bit of axe dark temptaion, but more femenine. A blast of coconut; better try it before buying it, price is good and performances is really good, if you like it (really sweet, coconutty creammy vibe) it woudld be a great deal at zara’s prices.
sdn_ – :
First, I did a dab sample and noticed that this has an accord that is similar to Mahogany by B&BW as well as a few others (Sensual Amber and Charles Jourdan The Parfum). I didn’t get much in the way of tobacco but it did seem pleasant, though if you are looking for an “old school”/”masculine” tobacco you might find this to be too “feminine.”
Then I did a regular wearing, and I got more of a Tobacco Vanille type quality, though not quite as “masculine” as that one. So, if you find TV to be intolerably “feminine,” I don’t think you’d like this. If you find TV to be too strong, then this softer and slightly weaker version might be for you. I still get some of that Mahogany accord, sort of like 50% or more TV and 50% or less Mahogany drydown. It cost me around $12 total for 100 ml so I’m quite pleased with this blind buy, and I would call it unisex, though they might have marketed it as masculine because their female buyers tend to be younger, and used to scents that are clearly more “feminine” than this one. Now as to “quality of ingredients,” I can no longer say this is not niche quality, because niche has really “gone downhill” lately, with nightmarishly “chemical” compositions. To me, this one is much more “natural” than those!
VlaedimirZorin – :
I think that we have to be fair with this one. I am following all this discussion and all this hype around this one from Zara quite a long time and my approach on this has to do with expectations.
I don’t think that anyone expects anything from a Zara perfume, they are so cheap, so mainstream and the past suggests that there will be no miracles here. What Rich, Warm Addictive achieved was that it passed quite above the mediocre level of most of Zara fragrances – even the standards of some lousy Designer’s Houses’ latest offerings.
I won’t say that it is a bad perfume. It is a nice perfume, well blended with some depth and respectful longevity and silage. But that’s all. No niche quality here, a well trained nose can detect some cheap quality ingredients and what puts me a little off is how much sweet this fragrance turns on with the pass of time, something that doesn’t happen with other “sweet” fragrances – for example “Ultra Male” by JPG, one of the most “sweet” perfumes around, stays quite sweet along the way but the dry down is not as sweet as the opening, with phenomenal longevity.
So give it a try because it is indeed a milestone for Zara perfumery BUT not perfumery in general.
*This review was written after several full wearings of the perfume and not just after smelling this on paper or on wrist.
sunny00 – :
Beautiful sweet vanilla honey fragrance tried in summer didn’t like it at all. However in the colder months it’s absolutely beautiful. For the price it’s stunning quality does not smell cheap or synthetic at all. Lovely fragrance. Not bad silage and longevity.
Most definitely unisex.
Rustam93 – :
To be honest, I find that it smells similar (less complex) than Jazz Club at the opening. Whereas jazz club evolves into a similar vibe than The One, RWA stays pretty linear; I’d say RWA only loses complexity as time passes by.
Still, it is a very likeable scent and rather unique for the average Joe.
pbc845elipseskism – :
I tested this fragrance and all i can say it is very similar to Ck One shock..with great sillage and longevity..it is best in cold weather..a masterpiece i could say for gourmand lovers ..honey and light quality tobacco
..try it yourself!
benik61 – :
Girl review,..bought for myself. Yummy, gourmand scent. Good and really addictive but it fades really fast…
It reminds me some of those new Victoria’s Secret mists.
sminciamb – :
Try layering this with its companion Tobacco Dark Exclusive and you have a heavenly combination. Dark, manly and mysterious, yet playful and full of promises…A panty dropper for sure!
soossyriz – :
despite all the youtube rumor and hype ….
nothing that can easily satisfy my nose …..
just plain feminine sweet smell, no into the deep surprise …. glad i didn´t blind buy it … better to smell it at shop and try it first … more female than for men
and be yourself … don´t be mass pleased by your fave youtube reviewers
e_maksi – :
This one is a mixed bag.
If you can endure the very strange, I’d even say slightly disgusting, opening (some 20 minutes or so) of harsh kind of wet tobacco soaked in something sweet and a bit off, it develops, when it calmes down, to a good combination of tobacco leaves and coconut with a pinch of something sweet and peppery. The opening reminds of Herod by Marlyor, even, dare I say, Pure Havane by Mugler (minus the cherry) and the drydown to Egoiste with burned coconut added to the mix.
Unfortunately, it later develops into a synthetic kinda tobacco-ish smell, that goes on for some 2 hours before it completely dissapears.
Longevity is good on skin (some 6 to 8 hours) and fantastic on clothes (easily a whole 24h or even more).
Projection is good for the first 2 hours, than it’s basicaly a skin scent with occasional whimps. Sillage is passable.
In all, the best part is in the middle, after it calmes down and before it goes full plasticky.
Is it the second coming? No. Is it worth the money? Yes.
It is good, it is overhyped.
A strong B, it would be better if they manage to tame the opening. I’m using a 2016 bottle, have one 2017 in stock, so maybe they reingeneered it a bit. Will see.
vvmmkk – :
So i got this and intense dark exclusive paired together for 20$ in Zara,to start it’s a really interesting smell and i can definately smell the tobacco and coconut and it’s a really sweet smell aswell,so it was worth it but it needs a lot of sprays if you want to be noticed,and even then the projection isn’t huge , but still a decent frag.
godmy – :
Finally got 2 that was in stock at my nearest zara.
batch 2017, it dosn’t last long, did it use to have huge sillage and projection. fragrances are useless for me unless others can smell what I am applying.
kamuz – :
Well that was a pleasant surprise, had never even heard of this before, tried it in store today and immediately bought it, can definitely see the resemblance to Herod which I own, it’s not on the same level but for that price who gives a?
Put it under another more established brand and sell it for $100 and people will be singing it praises
Xpert – :
Another hyped up fragrance because it’s hard to find. Ebay sellers are trying to rake in the cash selling 10ml samples for $20. Whenever you can only find small samples online that’s a dead giveaway the fragrance has been hyped up on Youtube and review sites. Don’t waste your money. It’s just a coconut bomb that is very feminine and overly sweet. There is absolutely no noticeable tobacco and the “honey” is extremely synthetic. Nothing compared to the Herod and Tom Ford’s Tobacco Vanille even at their higher prices. It’s also nowhere in the same league as Sweet Tobacco Spirits 18:21 which actually does live up to the hype. The tobacco in that is amazing!
Pygrourry – :
This is a rich, coconut honey tobacco smell for me a bit too rich too coconut gourmand – it’s get cloying to me, I like more f.e. the Kilian Back to Black – in a way you can compare both fragrances – they are different but both have certain main elements which make them connect f.e. in both fragrances the honey and Tobacco are prominent, but Back to Black is a more softer a bit more fruity the cherry and raspberry are very prominent as well and the vanilla of course. I can see why many people like the Zara frag – it’s a killer in longevity and has good silage in compare to a lot of more expensive to expensive fragrances– I have a bottle of the Zara frag which I hardly use – bought it together with the other tobacco which I like better
alleks411 – :
Amazing Scent
This reminds me of a lotion with that coconut smell. The honey gives it a sweet accord and a touch of sandalwood which gives it a bit of warmth. I get a bit of Palmer’s Coco Butter lotion even though there is no notes of Cocoa listed here. I will layer this with my cocoa butter lotion from palmers. This fragrance is rich with it’s sweetness. Warm and creamy with the Sandalwood giving me that lotion affect. This is just a nice cozy scent that will have your significant other addicted to your scent. That is the strength of this one. It is great for dates and hugging lol. Ladies will love this because of the share sweetness putting them in a romantic mood. I can see a woman easily wearing this because lotions are unisex right? OK, all jokes aside anyone can pull this beautiful scent off.
Longevity 4-6 hrs
Projection 1 hr of moderate projection then it turns into a coco butter lotion scent lol.
Great scent Zara done did it again!
CTAKAH99 – :
Meh. It reminds me of beaches full of people trying to get their tan on. And not in a romantic kind of way. No sunsets. Just the middle of a scorching hot day. In other words, it’s suntan lotion in a bottle. I wish I could like it. I love the part where it smells kind of green/medicinal but alas, it is somewhat short lived, like the entire scent.
Also, if you have 9.0, which is also available at Zara (and I happen to own one), this one is slightly redundant.
Reihar – :
There are some similarities with Boss Number One.
That’s great!
vital57rus – :
Meh. Annoying coconut sun lotion accord. No tobacco for me. And that was the only reason (tobacco) I blind bought it. Too cloying. Sold right away my 2 bottles (have no Zara where I live; asked a friend to buy it and mail them to me). Regretted every bit of it. Well, they are gone now. And that’s a good thing.
vhy900Negeltzex – :
This is the best fragrance from Zara in my opinion.
It is truly a remarkable scent for men.
My husband bought it and I think it is an adorable unisex EDT.
I went to a Zara shop near my house to buy one bottle for me.
……………………………… It was sold out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
Denis16 – :
First initial spray reminds me of roses vanille by mancera without the tobacco and honey and less feminine. This can be a unisex fragrance easily and great for colder months evening early spring cool weather. Great performance and silage. My first zara fragrance to try and impressed by the quality of the juice. great presentation and awesome price. I can also detect coconut but not strong. The dry down also reminds me of baking cakes.
xim666 – :
The most beautiful fragrance of Zara
froster – :
I swear I get Tuberose note in this!
prima1223 – :
I must say that of all my Tobacco perfumes and I have plenty, Zara Tobacco Collection rich, warm , and addictive has to be one of the best smelling on the market today. I know it’s hard to believe that a fairly inexpensive perfume from Zara could be this good but I assure you that if you like Tobacco based perfume you will definitely fall in love with this one. I have already bought a second bottle in fear of running out and I am scared that soon won’t be able to find it anymore. If anyone can help me with this I would be very appreciative.
EvilShurik – :
Best bang for buck. I’m not a great fan of ZARA perfumes, but this one is different. They managed to pull a winner here. Very natural smell and well blended, far beyond typical ZARA quality. I mostly get cocunut and honey, not much tobacco as others mentioned. No this is not similar to Herod, but fall in to same category. Surprisingly last long, around 8 hours with moderate projection. You have to be bit careful wearing this in tropical countries.
Улькиорра – :
I think this is a save sweet scent that anyone will like or even love it.
it’s makes you wanna eat your self, lol. It’s project well and longevity is great.
It’s affordable so dont worry about it.
For me 8/10. Thanks Zara.
mr.gamerman – :
HO HO HO HO . . . . .
an affordable DELICIOUS GOURMAND of male scent…
So coconut – biscuitty smell on the begining..and it turned a bit like your mother suntanned oil to massage on your back when sun bathing….
but wait to another 5-10 minutes..
the balanced of dark sweet choco – vanilla and fresh coconut will make your girl friend want to taste you..HO HO HO HO..BEWARE..
I LOOOVE IT..
cibol – :
name of this is spot on. very addictve. its cozy, soft quality ingredients.just think about the smell of coconut, honey and a soft tobacco equalized, its what you get with this one, here in brazil costs 33 USD i have a zara store 1Km from my house. i know its nothing new but for the price as almost everybody before me mentioned its a no brainer. great scent bargain.
ladies love it
kot260 – :
Absolutely love this stuff. Whenever I put it on it reminds me of a pipe tobacco that my uncle smoked. For me this is a gourmond. It smells delicious. Long lasting and good performance. I can’t think of a better buy.
I am going to make sure I have a couple of backup bottles.
rolstavnimoskva – :
Sentence summary:
Goes on smelling like women’s hairspray, then transitions to the smell of that same woman sitting in a hair salon eating a coconut custard tart.
Overall rating 7/10
evgenlipetsk – :
I spotted some really bad reviews for this one here.First of all,if you don’t care about details,for this price,you can’t go wrong,if you like tobacco in frags,go get this now.
It’s about 13-14 euros for 100ml,incredible price for this awesome frag.
I want to make it short,it smells at first like a very sweet chocolate with coconut and honey and in the dry down the tobbaco notes come to life with a very little bit of wood.
Performance: 6-7 hours
Projection : Heavy in the first hour,moderate 30-45 min after this and in the dry down is very soft.
Scent: A nice creamy and rich fragrance for nights out in the colder days. 8.5/10
It is indeed a little overhyped but for this price,it’s just incredible.
vcalancea – :
The first time I smelled it this one blew me away!This is the exact kind of fragrance I adore – pure honey and spices. It smell like a designer cologne, very unique and absolutely unisex. I cannot believe I bought it for 13 euros.
FilatovArkadij – :
This was probably the most talked about fragrance over the past winter, both here and online. There’s close to 20 reviews of it on Youtube. Our Zara store had it and I thought it really jumped out from their other offerings. It’s not the best thing I’ve ever