To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
maluhka – :
I agree with the user Carlitos , this 2018 version has a better performance , i have the same performance like the original 212 vip, but i only paid 12.95€ for the zara fragrance,and my 212 vip costs me 70€ .
I think it is a close fragrance of 212 vip.
sadhak – :
This perfume is similar to the 2016 version but it’s fresher, lasts longer and has a better sillage, probably due to a more prominent apple note and a stronger concentration.
It makes me remember of a fruitier and sweetier (and better) Ferragamo F Black. I still have not tested it properly, but so far I like it a lot!
I do believe the scent pyramid to be a lot more complex than what is shown above.