To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
kk-64 – :
Stark was launched in 2012 and its name comes from German, which means Strong, in English. It was created on the concept of inspiring courage, enthusiasm and masculinity.
According to the company, its fragrance is composed by head notes of cardamom, orange, petitgrain, lemon and rosemary, followed by body notes of rose, jasmine, sandalwood and lily of the valley, on a base of moss, vetiver, musk and velvety wood (probably they used the cashmeran compound).
The manufacturer classifies it as a woody-aromatic, but on my skin it behaved more like an aromatic-fougère. The output is great, but the evolution did not please me.
Stark has an aromatic explosion, which is delicious. Citrus fruits and rosemary please anyone, be it man or woman, especially, in relation to the Brazilian public. When jasmine and sandalwood come into action, the fragrance reaches its apex. So far, I only have compliments to do. The problem occurs when the base notes begin to become more noticeable and the moss joins the musk, bringing me the sensation of a generic fragrance of poor quality.
I remember that Stark was one of the most commented and praised Brazilian cologne in social media, by reviewers and users in Brazil, mainly, between the years 2016 and 2017. This gave me an immense expectation about the product. To increase this feeling, there is a lot of comparison to Fierce (Abercrombie & Fitch) as well as Legend (Montblanc). It is worth clarifying that such fragrances were only tested by me, in stores, at some time in the past. So I have no formed opinion about them.
Unfortunately, Stark brought me the bitter taste of disappointment, taking into account such expectation. It is not the kind of aromatic scent I imagined, although it is clear its popular appeal. But truth be told, it does not have high projection, but it lasted well on my skin and that point deserves to be reinforced.
hill9999 – :
It’s a copy of Abercrombie Fierce!!
Smells great! Very Fresh and confy, but not so sexy as the original!
In my skin, the longevity is good for an EDC, the longevity was 6 hours and the sillage is moderate only for 2 hours. After this, only close to the skin.
Fragrância/Fragrance: 8/10
Fixação/ Longevity: 6/10
Projeção/ Sillage: 6/10
Versatilidade/ Versatillity: 10/10
Try/ Buy/ Pass: Try
É uma cópia do Abercrombie Fierce!!
O cheiro é ótimo! Muito fresco e confortável, mas não tão sexy como o original!
Na minha pele, a fixação é boa para um EDC, a fixação foi de 6 horas e a projeção é moderada somente por 2 horas, após isso somente rente a pele.