To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
bev752InsuffBooni – :
One of the flowers in this makes it smell like dryer sheets. Not a fan. It is already starting to fade after less than ten minutes, so I cannot imagine longevity would be particularly good.
fartan777 – :
Not really a review – just more for anyone looking for information:
I have spoken to the peeps at Harvey Prince, and this perfume has been rebranded and used to be called Classico by Jo’rel Parker (not “Journey”, which is what the description says above – that is incorrect). So if you are looking for the old Jo’rel Parker Classico, this is the one to get! It’s the same scent with a different name. That explains why I couldn’t find it on this website!!
Beautiful perfume, I received a mini roller ball in a beauty box about 3 years ago and am going to buy a big bottle now. I’m in love with it.
RjemF – :
Sweet white flowers with citrus, simple, pretty, innocent, but it’s just not my style. Nothing wrong with it, it’s very wearable. It just bored me a little.
Xeroxqleja – :
I have 4 little bottles of pure oil of musk that a friend obtained while visiting Kashmir in the early 80s. The bottles are stoppered and have screw on caps. There is a scent that collects around the stoppers, inside the caps; it’s the smell of pure water. I know it sounds strange and water doesn’t really smell, but this is like the purity of water. I’m sure it has something to do with the musk being able to oxidize the tiniest bit there. It’s completely different from the musk inside the vials and I wouldn’t necessarily describe it as ozonic, but some might. Anyway, this is the exact scent that opens Sincerely; a blast of fresh purity. I adore the moments of this. It then morphs into well-blended white flowers; okay but not spectacular. And for the late drydown it changes again. The woods take over and it DRIES out. This part is lovely and airy. The opening and ending are spectacular but I don’t enjoy the heart enough to obtain this.
amadey – :
Wow. For me this completely clashed with my chemistry, which I believe doesn’t react well with tuberose or patchouli. This ended up smelling exactly like (clean) cat litter on me! At first it was okay, albeit a bit more “manly” than I’m used to, but still pleasant. Then after about a half hour, I noticed the weird “cat litter” smell and after about an hour and a half, I just had to wash it off because the tuberose and cedar began smelling like a hamster or something.
Spexocorronee – :
This is a sharp white floral with very little lasting power. It’s almost like the perfume version of a tingly mouthwash. It’s a quick pick-me-up that fades to nothing in such a way that you don’t even realize that it’s happening.
ebulfez – :
On my this is a little darker than described in other reviews with cedar and clove front and center mixed with intense freesia. Unusual not bad but not fab either. Just ok
deveshonego – :
This was in my ipsy bag a few months ago, and I find that I am kind of warming to it. It’s a pretty, delicate floral (I have the roll on version). Now, on me it is not long lasting at all and doesn’t have much sillage either. However, there are times when that kind of suits me (today I was singing in church and some people complain about fellow choir members’ perfumes driving them crazy. No one complained today) It’s probably not going to be my favorite as my taste generally runs to louder and less floral. However, it IS pretty.
st1m-111 – :
Smelled this on my daughter who had received a sample in her Birchbox. I loved it. Bought a small spray vial and am going through it like water. It doesnt seem to have much sillage but thars fine. I am enjoying the scent on my self all day and am presently addicted. It stays on my clothes and scarves. I am not quite sure which note is so appealing to me as i am not that educated as to the individual notes. Could be the tuberose or the cyclamen. Heady. Makes me very happy. Yummy.
GapsFanyreere – :
Love this light but intense scent. I have the version Jo’rel Parker Classico, which is the same according to the Harvey Prince site. I think this is a great fresh floral, and agree that it is a good choice for summer nights.
Yura_patriot – :
A beautiful sweet/tart floriental. Perfectly casual yet still carries an air of elegance and exotic flair. Fragrantica seems to be missing a few notes, so here hey are from the Harvey Prince website:
Notes: Indonesian Clove Bud, Australian Sandalwood, Moroccan Rose, French Bergamot, Indian Tuberose, Japanese Orange Flower, Lebanese Cedarwood, Turkish Cyclamen, South African Freesia
Style: Exotic. Awakening. Transformative.
It used to be called Journey (which I find to be a more fitting name).
marttek – :
I am in LOVE. I can’t believe I have never smelled this. Actually, I have never even heard of this line, but received a sample the other day in a beauty subscription bag. It is very white floral dominant, but turns refreshingly citrus with a beguiling effervescent and salty twist on my skin at its last (base) unfolding. It is quite strong when first applied, but I would not say to use it sparingly, as it dies down quickly and settles in to a pleasant floral that is not overbearing (on my skin). My husband complimented me immediately both times I have tried it on. I will be toting this along to the Caribbean with us for our holiday next month as I think it works well in the heat. Cheers 🙂
rio – :
A pleasant, sheer white floral with a healthy dose of citrus thrown in. It immediately reminded me of Glow by Jennifer Lopez, although the absence of musk makes Sincerely a little sweeter and headier. The tuberose is noticeable but sits politely below the orange blossom and freesia, so I think people with an aversion to tuberose wouldn’t mind this one. Would be a great summer evening fragrance. Longevity seems to be rather fleeting, sillage was moderate at first but quickly tames down to a skin scent. This looks to be rather inexpensive, but probably harder to track down than Glow.