To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Buppyc – :
smells like a hot shave at the barbershop, and yes – close to Rive Gauche
cnr566JeomiWogkig – :
Possibly made before Abercrombie and Fitch Woods, but I consider it Wood’s little sister. When A&F stopped selling Woods, this is what I went to. They are sister companies, so it makes sense. Now they are both discontinued, sadly. On second hand markets, this one sells for a lot more. I find that unnecessary. While I love both fragrances, I prefer Woods. It has that classic man connotation with lavender, woods and musk. If you ever want to find a fragrance for a working man, this is it. If you can find either fragrances for a good price (under $50-100) get them. They won’t likely be made again. Happy Hunting!
d-ias8 – :
Yeah, I don’t think there is a female version of this scent, women wear it regardless.
bot211speagoessenda – :
One of my personal favorites. It is sharp and musky at first and very distinctive but dries down to a somewhat soapy barbershop fragrance, that lingers all day on your skin. One of the few fragrances that truly lasts on my skin. I wore this daily when it was more readily available, but it has now been relegated to occasional wear to make it last. Heard that YSL Rive Gauche is similar so I think, I’ll give that a try. Truly a great fragrance and I hope at some point they will bring it back.
SLim6541 – :
Very masculine scent. The closest thing I can compare it to is Dirty English, but Ruehl is way better. Ive worn it for so long, but still have trouble describing it. Think male barber shop with an edge. An intimidating peppery musk with a leather background. The dry down on this is hands down the BEST drydown of any fragrance. Spray it on your jeans or clothes and it will follow you all day. The initial blast of this is intense, but after 20-30 minutes it changes into a completely different fragrance.
bosmenios – :
IN REPLY TO “LITTLERAYRAY”
No this one is not the women’s version but the men’s version,maybe that’s why you and your husband found it too leathery and strange as a women’s fragrance.
qmx231JeomiWogkig – :
Very manly and classic. It has an intimate bite and a soft drydown. Something you’d think would be a polo. Many compliments from women. As weird as it might sound, most women like a cologne that reminds them of their dad or grandpa. Ruehl No.925 Cologne definitely has such a smell. The cologne has a strong, musky-yet-modern aroma that’s attractive enough that every Ruehl store is required to spray the scent on every article of clothing in the store. Sound like an Abercrombie and Fitch idea? It is, they’re owned by the same group.