Description
Fashion house of John Richmond launches two new fragrances that are targeted at younger audience and that belong to the contemporary line of the house, Richmond X. The fragrances are Richmond X Woman and Richmond X Man.
Richmond X Woman is a floral – fruity composition that begins with accords of apple, raspberry and osmanthus. Its floral heart encompasses freesia, violet and heliotrope, while the base notes capture ambery wood, cedar and vanilla.
Real-life celebrity couple Belen Rodriguez and Stefano De Martino is representing the ad campaign, photographed by Iris Brosch. The fragrances are available as 40 and 75 ml Eau de Toilette.
Richmond X Woman was launched in 2014.
v-64977 – :
Nothing wrong with this one, except that this is exactly the kind of fragrance that I don’t like at all – namely, a very sweet fruity floral. I just can’t wear this type of scent at all. Obviously such scents are created with younger consumers in mind; but even when I was a teenager I never liked them. This reminds me of an artificial sugary fizzy drink paired with a sugar coated doughnut – and I hate them both.
xsenus – :
I love all the notes listed here so I had high expectations for it,Not what I’ve expected but I like it
I can mostly smell dominantly soft almondy vanilla,violet and some woodsy notes
Vanilla is not really sweet or warm here,not even delicious and gourmandish .I can’t detect fruits and not that much heliotrope I wished,yet I like overall combination,not enough to buy a bottle unless it grows on me… It’s modern,non offensive and not a typical floral fruity,not even the typical baby powder or makeup powder,,though it’s really powdery,it’s an almondy vanilla powder
Longevity is decent but sillage is soft..it’s almost a skin scent..it’s wearable all around the year but my mind links it to fall
edit:after wearing it a couple of time now I can get:powdery vanilla+heliotrope+a fruity freshness probably it’s apple…If you like soft vanillic powdery scents with an almondy vibe and with a fresh undertone and not too sweet give it a try,it’s not an edible delicious scent,a very office friendly one and fruit notes don’t let it to become as dry as most similar scents,I really like it’s opening and specially middle notes,but drydown is plain vanilla on me,sort of wet vanilla and very faint,I don’t think I’d buy a bottle
❤️❤️❤️
LogyAnaLogy – :
This is a nice, sweet, not too expensive perfume. I tested it and thought ‘why not’. After a while it reminded me a little of D&G The One
bloooder – :
I like richmond bottles, but apparently not the perfumes. right after spraying, I smelt a hint of flowers and chocolate mixed with powdery notes which smelt very generic and almost like cleaning products. the only thing that makes this perfume distinguishable is the chocolate note. I swear that even now, after 2 hours I smells chocolate or caramel n it. Maybe it is vanilla note, but it is very similar to chocolate for me.
I don’t think neither the bottle nor the name “x” match the personality of this perfume. it is just a sweet perfume which smells mostly like a mild oriental floral to me.
pypetetaelody – :
I’m surprised that there is no review yet for this perfume.
I’ve seen it for a while on shelves and I gave it a few try-on, but everytime to no big results.
It’s a nice scent, easy to wear, feminine enough, little sweet but a bit generic. It reminds me of a tamed version of something else, probably Alien.
The woody drydown with vanillic edge is very nice but not very original. It gives some depth.
The apple is noticeable all along the evultion but it’s not annoying. Sprayed a little more liberally it could make a good modern perfume for average trendy urban girl, not necessarily a teenager.
It’s quite longlasting, not too projecting.
The bottle is beautiful.
I dislike the unoriginal ad and the ubiquitous Belen R. that here we are still forced to see everywhere on medias in every soup and colour and she’s not even nice.
Anyway the perfume is nice.