To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Schtirliz – :
Very sweet scent and does have a pretty nice woodsy Drydown, but not much more than a day time venture for me.
PSM2 delivers an average yet enjoyable package but is not hitting any home runs.
6 out of 10
grexxx1 – :
This is a massive scent! Extremely loud and intrusive I’m not a fan but I appreciate it for being bold and it does stand out from the crowd.
I just think it’s a little clumsy and harsh in its composition.
4ba9lta3zar – :
I got a bottle of this sweet juice for birthday.Never heard of it and never seen in the stores, so I was excited.
First,it’s bitter-sweet, some notes are synthetic but blended very well,first couple of hours I smell orange melon and it settles down to a nice soft cardamon/woody scent.
It’s moderately strong and sillage is a killer. Longetivity- up to 6-8 hours on skin and 24-32 hours on cotton clothing.
I find a bit too strong for me, but I love it since I get a lot of compliments that i never gotten while wearing Paco’s 1 Mill.
Edit: My first bottle was leaking-from under atomizer,I bought a second bottle and it has the same issue! While cleaning up the cosmetic case where it leaked I got so nauseous that i had to take shower and open all windows.Unfortunately now I can’t stand this cologne coz I get nauseous even when I see the bottle.
Deroxnsfsq – :
This has a real strong cosmetics smell, a kin to Dior Homme & (DHI). Great powdery, lipsticky, dry, dusty, woody/floral scent. For a scent NAMED “MAN” I’d have thought it would smell less unisex than it does! This one can easily go both ways. I do like it though. If it didnt have the Iris note’s powder/cosmetic affect working so hard in it, than it would be just another sweet men’s “one million” type scent. BUT, the truth is that it’s actually much much more. Try IT! For the price, it’s a winner.
8/10
Grooberog – :
This boy can over power you in the beginning but the beauty of him on me is the lasting and projecting power, he goes out with full force and fears no nostrils,.,., he be a monster, you either love him or hate him but I’ll own him for he gives enough protection.
Kipak – :
Bought at first sniff ages ago. Bad decision.
Very sinthetic and too similar to every other sweet men fragrance.
It is nothing special, just another comercial designer fragrance.
I like Paul Smith’s clothing, but I must confess, he indeed knows how to put his “colorful” touch to the fragrance. BAD. That touch only fits clothes.
My rating: 3/10
Stasisman1997 – :
Too sweet.
Too synthetic.
Like a chemical plant.
Makes me feel sick.
Not sophisticated.
TymnRattcam – :
Got some poor reviews here. I actually quite like it. Granted it’s not a patch on the Early PS stuff. But not a bad summer/multi purpose cologne. Fruity with cardamom with a spicy lavender edge. Lasts longer on my skin than some and feels clean and fresh enough for most occasions.
sedoy_vr – :
Please Mr Paul Smith, I know that personally you don’t really have an interest in fragrances, but don’t renew your contract with InterParfums. They just don’t get the DNA your brand. Like your clothes attract a certain style of customer, so should your fragrances. Though you are a big brand, you are a niche brand at heart. Why don’t your fragrances reflect that? Your very first cologne, not the green bottle, I mean the one sold exclusively at your stores at the end of the 1980s, early 1990s… at is IMHO the only true Paul Smith fragrance to date.
Why not a Paul Smith x Comme des Garçons fragrance?
tralickDeerce – :
lavender+nutmeg, tonka bean+cardamom= made in awesome, sweet way.if u like that give this one a try!
sillage : 10/10
longevity :all the day: skin & clothes. 10/10
тихий6 – :
Tom Ford reputedly took seconds to give the go-ahead to Gucci rush for women when he first smelt it. Now, Tom Ford has a good nose for fragrance; This smells like someone said to the cleaner at Inter parfums “would you buy this for your grandson at christmas,birthdays,etc”? The cleaner probably took seconds to reply “whatever”.
Like i said in my Burberry sport review, how much more effort does it take to make a good fragrance rather than a woeful sub-drugstore scent. Paul Smith fragrances were once fantastic and now they are just shit.