Oud 777 Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777

3.75 из 5
(12 отзывов)

Oud 777 Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777

Rated 3.75 out of 5 based on 12 customer ratings
(12 customer reviews)

Oud 777 Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777 for women and men of Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777

SKU:  7bbecdbaebd3 Perfume Category:  . Fragrance Brand: Notes:  , , .
Share:

Description

Oud 777 by Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777 is a Oriental Woody fragrance for women and men. Oud 777 was launched in 2014. The nose behind this fragrance is Stephane Humbert Lucas. Top note is agarwood (oud); middle note is agarwood (oud); base notes are leather and tonka bean.

12 reviews for Oud 777 Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777

  1. :

    4 out of 5

    . ی کم زیادی مهربونه در برابر عودهای افیونی و اسرار امیز. این عود هامبرت لوکاس دقیقا رایحه دود حاصل از سوختن اگار وود پاک شده رو داره اینسنس عود واقعی در کنار رایحه چرم دباغی شده بسیار لوکس و تمیز فاقد حس چرک و انیمالیک.
    خیلی شاهانه و کلاسیه . ابدا حس حرمی و معنوی نداره.
    شروعی بسیار فاخر از رایحه عود کمی سبز کمی اسپایسی کمی فروتی . قلب عطر تا انتها در کنار چرم تمیز کمی حس صابونی داره ولی خشک و اسموکی نیست. همین روند تا ساعتها بدون تغییر ادامه داره تا مرگ رایحه پخش بوی ملایم و ماندگاری خیلی عالی روی پوست بدون تخریب رایحه.
    به جرات اگر از قیمتش چشمپوشی بشه کرد یکی از فاخر ترین عطرهایست که محوریت عودی داره.

  2. :

    3 out of 5

    I blind bought an almost full bottle of this from ebay for a really good price and it absolutely blew me away. This stuff is simply magnificent…. It is without a doubt the best fragrance I’ve ever owned.
    The opening of this is quite animalic… a bit barn-yardy but I love it. Once it dries down this settles a bit then the lovely warmth of the tonka comes in. I think I’ve found the ‘one’.
    I think this is getting quite hard to get now, possibly discontinued. If you’re into thick & heavy oud-based frags with great lasting power, you should try and get a hold of this amber beauty if you get the chance!

  3. :

    3 out of 5

    Why frankensense and resins aren’t on the pyramid or mentioned here is beyond me.
    Heavy oud, a backbone of incense that becomes more pronounced as the oud fades back in to the dry down, and a small dash of leather and tonka.
    Longevity is strong but sillage diminshes substantially after just about 2hrs, as with most 777s and natural(ish) fragrances in my experience.
    Beautiful, natural smelling and refined.
    I love it and feel good when I put it on.
    If you’ve got it, spend it.

  4. :

    5 out of 5

    بوی عودی تاریک و تلخی داره.بوی چرم در آن خشکی و تاریکی خاصی داده.کمی چرم دودی هست نه زیاد.بهمراه ادویه .کاری کاملا شرقی و بسیار قوی با ماندگاری بالایی داره. Ohiraرو رو یه دستم زدم Oud رو رو دست دیگم.الن بعد 7 ساعت عود قویتر از اوهیرا هست

  5. :

    5 out of 5

    Smells similar to Serge Lutens Arabie, but maybe (more) woody with a little bit of a honeyed backbone to it.
    If you like Arabie, you might like this. If you hate Arabie, you might hate this.. haha.

  6. :

    3 out of 5

    A dense and bold Oud-based animalic, this polarizing masterpiece from Stephane Humbert Lucas is a gorgeous blend of two types of Oud from Burma and Laos with leather, animalic accords and a slight hint of tonka bean. The scent has enormous projection/sillage and longevity. It also has an enormous animalic opening that could be off putting to most people not used to high quality Oud fragrances. No one quiet blends Oud like SHL and this one is no exception. The animalic qualities of Laotian Oud are further enhanced by leather and animalic notes. Only for the very brave animalic and Oud lovers, this is a masterpiece of modern perfumery that deserves high marks because of the bold uncompromising animalic approach taken by the master perfumer.

  7. :

    3 out of 5

    People who say there is no oud in here don’t know what real oud smells like. No, there’s no Montale oud. But there is oud most definitely. A complex and deep scent.

  8. :

    4 out of 5

    فوق العادست… بویی عودی و چوبی بسیار عالی که در تلفیق با هم بویی بسیار شیک و تلخ رو به مشامتان رهنمون میکنه وبدون شک یکی از شاهکارهایی که بر پایه عوود هست.. ماندگاری کم نظیر و پخش بوی خوبی داره.. ولی به نسبت قیمت بالای یک میلیون حجمی 50 میل دار… ولی بوش واااقعا خاص و حرفه ایه.

  9. :

    5 out of 5

    I had high hopes for this fragrance. today i just tried it and it wasn’t that pleased about it. i’ve loved Stephane’s creations to the max and most of his 777’s creations will be in my wardrobe, but this one beside Omma, aren’t one of them yet! my nose and passion may change through time and i go loving this one day (as what have happened with O’Hira).
    at the beginning it wasn’t that waw essence, as it was kind of harsh and weird smell at the same time. it was kind of Henna smell (Yemen & Omani Style) mixed with dried lemons (lumi) and maybe a bit of agarwood as i remember smelling such note from one of my friends who is an amazing oud freak as he goes picking agarwood (bokhoor – the oud wood) precisely and accurately one by one when buying, but i don’t recall the name, so as long as that guy has it then it is truly oud.
    after calming down, it turns dramatically to O’Hira but with a major hand on hand of the essence of Yemen Henna which is sweet and harsh at the same time. quite strong and powerful long lasting. not for me at the time being, i’ll try it again and will see about it

  10. :

    3 out of 5

    I bought this on a whim, YUK! terrible fragrance. Nice Bottle is the kindest thing I can say.

  11. :

    4 out of 5

    Like O Hira, this is a resin-driven affair. It’s every bit as delicate and polished, retaining the same degree of earthy interest, but as far as oud goes, this one’s very similar to Creed’s Royal Oud in that the oud is really not there at all—at least in relation to Western synthetic ouds or even Eastern authentic ones. What you get instead is a lot of labdanum, myrrh, some frankincense, and some spices over a smooth, balmy base.
    When placed into the context of its brethren (other spendy lines such as Clive Christian, Roja Dove etc.), I find that the 777 resins are superior, dealing a more subtle and nuanced hand. There’s a bit of a Norma Kamali Incense feel to this, and that’s a scent that many find to be a challenge, so I’m not sure this will have the same impact of the more crowd-pleasing offerings from the likes of Christian and Dove. Furthermore, this isn’t a loud scent; it sits politely on the skin and doesn’t have that many layers of complexity. There’s depth to the materials themselves, but the scent doesn’t do any backflips or pack any surprises.
    And so, once more, my concern is the same as that of O Hira: the price. I rarely talk about price in my reviews as it’s a totally subjective thing, but this is again quite outlandish. The materials are very nice, the composition is smooth and refined, but there’s nothing going on here that’s really worthy of the cost. Even the best resinous absolutes and extractions are not that expensive, and that’s what forms the majority of this composition. What made O Hira so pricey was the fossilized amber (again, not that expensive a material), but this really is just labdanum, myrrh, and some spices—there’s very little else to it. It’s lovely for what it is—nuanced, subtle, mysterious—but I imagine that the kind of people who drop this kind of money on perfume are the kind of people who want to be sure that every knows about it, and this is not going to accomplish that effect. It’s just handful of basic resins, nicely put together, and that’s it. An oudless oud, but we’re all used to that by now.

  12. :

    3 out of 5

    What can I buy with 500 dollars? Floor Seats at a Basketball Game, A Roundtrip Ticket, Furniture from Pier One and apparently Oud 777…Stephane Lucas’s Oud offering is a double agent for sure. Part reeky and part savory. The short lived reeky opening of Oud 777 is impossible to ignore and better reserved for a living organism other than a human being. The flagrant stench reminded me of hay mixed with the felt lining used in board games. From the rubble waves a white flag of saccharine labdanum and syrupy oud. The fragrance could easily have been named Labdanum 777. One thing that’s inescapable is the wildlife characteristic ever so present throughout the entire duration. Leather fans may be disappointed to learn that the sought after note is unexpressive. You will likely get caught up in your own deception as you convince your mind that something hide-like is present. Does Oud 777 smell like $500? Well..most perfumes with this kind of unconventionality tend to be pricey, so the answer is likely yes. Smell and value are two different things. You can be the judge for the value. Smell-wise, not better than Black Gemstone but I’d give it a B+

Oud 777 Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777

Add a review

About Stéphane Humbert Lucas 777