To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
banzaj – :
I like it and wear it, but on my skin it eventually smells like a single note – cedar shavings. I don’t hate cedar shavings, mind you, but I wish the lasting scent was a little more complex.
ser0159 – :
It took me some time to understand and appreciate this fragrance. And then just one day November came and I can’t stop using it. It’s so calming. It starts off a little bit mushroomy and oily, super-woody of course – this part is amazing. In the middle oil becomes wax, then the woods start to fade into ‘burnt’ musks with the slightliest touch of vanilla. Deepness.
s.kazak – :
This is my favorite all-wood scent and I’ve sampled a ton. It’s neck and neck with Tom Ford’s Oud Wood as my all time top fragrance. It’s also the most unique, over-the-top woody scent I’ve ever tried – uniqueness is definitely a trend with Fueguia. There’s no overpowering pencil shavings or hamster cage effect to this wood, which seems to be the downfall of many other wood scents. There is what I think is a subtle citrus note but I can’t put my finger on it exactly.
I have the eau de parfum version and wow, does this last forever. It lingers for days on my sweaters and scarves. Projection is really impressive as well. I wish the nozzle had an option for a less voluminous spray because one spray really fills the room.
vjrheiby – :
Facts: Nice packaging. Looks great on your fragrance shelf(makes you look like a real connoisseur). This has the strength of an eau de cologne. Longevity is poor and sillage is soft. The opening smells nutty with a hint of rum. Every 5 minutes, you smell less and less till it vanishes.
Opinion: I can’t believe that Fueguia has the unmitigated gall to produce something so fleeting and unsavory while arrogantly placing a high price tag for this item. $240 dollars for a 47 minute fragrance? I don’t think so. I don’t want to hear this nonsense about[In my snob voice] “The perfume is pricey due to the obscurity of the ingredients”. What’s most frustrating is Otro doesn’t smell bad. It’s a victim of familiarity within it’s own house. I guess that’s what happens when you release 6,000 wood frags within a 3 year span. My vitriolic attack isn’t meant to cause a furor but instead raise the awareness of the value or lack of that’s presented…