To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
ansonver12 – :
This is a great fragrance that’s a straight beast…Noo it skips beast mode and goes straight NUCLEAR!
It’s an amazing fragrance, that you see where they copied the Invictus DNA…But then took that blueprint and made it their own. By going balls to the wall with Sillage, Projection, Longevity, ETC…And by changing a few notes around.
Must try…if you want something Invictus Intense like, but not Invictus Intense.
I used six sprays…both wrist, back & front of my neck, chest, and front of my shirt.
Will I buy this again?…No, I don’t see myself finishing this bottle.
What’s the strength of this? EDP.
Can you use it as a unisex scent? No.
Am I willing to trade this fragrance? No.
Should You Skip It, Sample It First or Blind Buy It? I say blind buy it.
1.Sample it first: if you wanna just say, you tried another Invictus like scent/clone (But this is way stronger).
Just remember to go to Saks or Macy’s to try this one for free…Outside of that, then you can get a sample from eBay, Letgo, Craigslist, Etc…for a few bucks.
2.Skip it: if you don’t like Invictus Intense(This is strong).
3.Blind Buy: if you love sweet, woody, aquatics and you can’t get enough of them.
Is it the old, new formulation? New.
What’s its availability; in production, limited edition or discontinued? Limited Edition(Buy it while you can).
SKU Number: 6085010041933
Batch Number: 224977 (Production Date: 01/2017)
Age: 21+
From: Jet
Size: 85ML
Scent: 5/5 (Nice).
Value: 5/5 ($35.00).
Sillage: 5/5 (Five to six feet).
Longevity: 5/5 (Ten hours plus).
Creativity: 5/5 (Citrusy, sweet, with a bitter boozy scent, think Invictus Intense).
Projection: 5/5 (Two hours plus).
Versatility: 5/5 (Anytime & anywhere, but will shine more during warmer times).
Compliments: 5/5 (Nice).
Until next time, I’ll catch you on the flipside.
ohimatomuf – :
It’s gorgeous and long lasting. Reminds of Armani code ice
Саша20011997 – :
This is really nice, but selling at between £70 and £80 in U.K for 85ml! From only a couple of sellers. This is ludicrous for something from this great house, known for quality budget offerings. I think that this could be a marketing mistake from them, when most of their perfumes can be purchased at between £15 and £30 for 100-105 ml. I think their loyal customers may rebel!
Chanel, Dior, Hermes prices are around the same price, and the houses have the pedigree, to pull it off (rip you off?!)
As someone has already used the Hyundai example, I will add that it’s like Hyundai making a car, then trying to flog it at Mercedes prices because it has some Swarovski crystals on the bonnet!
When all said and done, this is a great scent, belonging in the Invictus genre with respectable performance. If I can get a bottle at a reasonable price, I’ll get a bottle, but other creations are already pitched into this genre, so I’m going to get all of them eventually, and compare them with the well known brands. This will take a few months to get them all, but I will share my findings when I do.
lsd73 – :
scent : 9/10
sillage : 8/10
longevity :8/10
70% day / 30% night fragrance
reminds me of invictus
nice sea and amber scent
пабло альберти – :
Armaf is what Hyundai was to the automotive industry over 10 years ago. As long as its a good value, there is no real reason to buy anything else since all they do is make fairly competent knockoffs of other wonderfully engineered/crafted scents.
There is nothing signature about this brand but for the value they earn a thumbs up for sure. This scent in particular is cloying to me as are a lot of other knockoffs they make.
Blue Homme is perhaps their greatest clone – If you like Aqua Di Gio, particularly ‘Profumo’, then dont hesitate!
OROS reminds me of a person who went haywire and sprayed Paco Rabannes iterations of 1 Million and then did the same with Invictus.
cob124speagoessenda – :
Icufish is correct. This is part of the armaf brand..
Funny how we all smell things differently.
To me it’s a strong citrus with a peppered jasmine. I can strongly detect the floral in this. Very pleasant.
To be honest this is unisex.
Not pour homme.
This doesn’t have to much oomph. It lasted 4-6?7? Hours. Great projection for the first couple hours then it turns to a soft sweet woody base.
I can see this being worn in spring and low heat summer. Probably at night.
But obviously you can wear what you want when you want to.
Not to bad. But i don’t think i would want to buy this. Judge for yourself. You may find you like this scent.
Kind regards. Lj
vad83mas – :
The brand which launched Oros, is Armaf, not Oros. Fragrantica admin, please correct it.
Maxonnn – :
Tried this at a store.. its very sweet and has Some depth to it. A winter/fall frag. Its not unique and reminds me of many frags in this category or group.
Its not my type but a decent frag nonetheless.