To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
зоя – :
Fairly minimal woody scent where vetiver takes a lead.
A “reference” scent: it’s strictly neutral, basically emotionless.
I burst into laughter when I saw the price.
Anzor1980 – :
Very masculine scent. It reminds me (I thing because of vetiver Terre d’Hermes-Hermes. So strong, so woody.
lo_ony_d – :
Totally minimal, very upmarket, *very* punchy patch + vetiver + wood (and there’s not enough of the third for it to be detectably guaiac rather than just generic dark woodsiness imo). So, not great for me if two legs of this triad are the ones I’m not keen on (patch, vetiver, really dicey notes for me as they repel me when done wrong and are just OK even when done right.) I’d rather have had much much more guaiac and the other two creeping in more discreetly. For me the overall effect of this one is a shade too butch and manly, but still just about wearable (which is a shocking reversal!) and done with perceptibly high class organic ingredients, not overwhelming synthetics, and it’s all held in a very disciplined balance. Dark, moody, smouldering. Think young Robert de Niro.
Unisex tending to masculine but you do have to really really appreciate patchouli. Strong sillage and longevity too. This one is not for me but I’m glad to have tried it; there’s a real sense of confidence and quality to it. So if really classy patch & vetiver do it for you, then have at it!
Jiimy Tiler – :
Wood fillings, vetiver, And black pepper.
No sign of patchouli at all, just straightforward wood fillings, vetiver, and black pepper with some cedar.
Fairly put and simple.
starshinabatarei21 – :
Cinnakitty is spot on imho. It’s nice though if you like dark green earth bound scents. Very unisex. So simple. It makes the prices they are charging all the more ludicrous.
baryshev – :
Bang!
Patchouli.
Strong Patchouli.
Some woodiness/vetiver.
That’s about it.
Very simple scent. For those who like damp forest floors.
almoledobby – :
A fragrance from the Forbidden Incense collection.
Like it, quite a nice smoky/woody patchouli and vetiver combo. Not sure if it would stand out in a crowd, but I’d happily wear it.
Won’t disappoint those wanting to see the Haiku associated with this one:
My love has the colour of the night
A firefly
In the swimming pool’s light