To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
pfq122Negeltzex – :
OK, I know not everyone is a fan of dupes, but when you have champagne tastes on a beer budget, or if you’re like me and have a monthly fragrance budget to stick to, seeking out dupes is a great way to get more bang for your buck. Not all dupes are winners, especially since most for me are blind buys, but luckily Miss Tutu was an exception.
I was working in Macy’s cosmetics department when Coco Mademoiselle was released, and EVERYONE wore it. I never really gave it a fair chance because I smelled it everywhere, so I automatically dismissed it. Now enough time has passed, and I became curious to smell it again, but not enough to pay $85 for a bottle. I’ve read good things about Milton Lloyd, and at $10 a bottle, I said why not.
Even though it’s been years since I smelled CM, the minute I sprayed it I was instantly transported to that Macy’s counter. It was incredible how familiar this was…Scent memory is an amazing thing, isn’t it? And this time around I gave it a real chance. Immediately I pick up the sweet citrus-y top notes and a distinct patchouli note, but the patch is not overwhelming. After 10 minutes or so it settles into a pleasant, clean floral. I can’t really pick out too many distinct notes after this point; it’s just a beautiful cloud of juicy citrus, tangy patch, soft florals, and a bit of soapy white musk. I wore it to work and people walking past my office commented that something smells really good (I like to think it was me.)
Silage and longevity are very good, especially at this price. And if anyone ever asks if I’m wearing Coco Mademoiselle, I won’t be the least bit surprised (and of course I’ll just smile and nod…No one has to know the truth!)
So glad I gave this a try… It’s a new favorite!
Nanosferic – :
Another nice fragrance from ML. An initial burst of lily of the valley, which i don’t like too much of as it reminds me of shake n vac. It develops into a lovely fruity rose scent, with cooling aquatic notes with a hint of vanilla. Over all a very nice summer fragrance.
evrorus2012 – :
I haven’t smelt CM for a while however i’ve just received this today and one of the girls in the office has it and said that it does smell very similar!
It’s a lovely scent at a fantastic price! Will comment on longevity and sillage once i’ve had a chance to wear it properly.
LokiLegioner – :
An excellent dead ringer for Coco Mademoiselle. It doesn’t have quite the same resonance but its very good and captures the spirit of it well.
siamions – :
I love this fragrance, the price is amazing, it smells wonderful and lasts for hours. What’s not to love. Smells just like Coco Mademoiselle. I have got lots of friends to try this and none of them have been disappointed.