To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
onise – :
I am a big fan of NR vintages, and I came by this beauty by chance. I was looking for another fragrance and I suddenly saw this on german E bay. This is a woody floral heaven, typical Nina Ricci style. I am not surprised that MIchel Hy made this. I think that this is a true 60´ties fragrance in its own right. I wish that the ladies of today would choose to wear a masterpiece of this caliber. Sophistication and grace in a bottle.
antares111 – :
This classic style chypre floral has beautiful notes listed. Does anyone know what this perfume might still vibe with today? I’d love to wear something like this.
xav219Negeltzex – :
Females answer to Signoricci?
skarabey-2008 – :
Finally!
My aunt still have a bottle of this delicious fragrance into her house. So I had the occasion to test it for decades, she stop use it in the 80s.
This is a great light flowery citrusy woody complex creation, not too far to be a cologne, not too far to be unisex.
This fragrance doesn’t have a particularly dominant note. It is country-chic, prairie-chic, hippie-chic. Sort of Paris/Kansas. It is the marriage of Parisian Haute Couture and the rediscover of the uncontaminated nature typical of that age. The scent follows Eau Sauvage de Dior and precedes O de Lancome and all those Eaux fresh of the 70s, eau folle, eau de campagne, eau de patou, eau de rochas.
Lovely and in some way similar to the mentioned, just more soapy flowery Citrusy woody dry-spicy than green. A fresh corolla of flowers plus many elements. Balanced, not so 70s, a french classic. I repeat: a sort of cologne without neroli/orangeblossom notes.
A girl that wear a white or champagne cotton muslin dress with a big hat same color and fabric to take a ride into town.
That is the picture of Mademoiselle Ricci.