To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Panchik88 – :
I had the luck of try this one for one day. At the first sniff, it’s rough. a luxury rough. After 5 minutes it dry out and there’s the real scent. This one is a rich woody pepper scent. The mix with the incense and the pepper it’s extremely well balanced. It’s classy, different but in a good way. It lasts up to 4 hours
vadyanya1988 – :
its piss weak ,, has no strength … Shame on you for releasing this .
What i smell faintly is nice , but compared to Leonard pour Homme its about 8x times weaker !! truly its barely After shave strength .
Sergbox – :
just a rubbish scent!
lol – :
This review is for the 1980 version, which is not the bottle pictured here (it’s called Leonard Pour Homme). The Estonian site lists the following notes:
Top: Basil, bergamot, lavender, marjoram, petigrain oil, thyme.
Mid: Artemisia, carnation, carrot, cedar, cinnamon, jasmine, iris, patchouli, vetiver.
Base: Amber, castoreum, labdanum, leather, moss, musk.
For me, the lavender/herbal aspect is clear, and you get occasional wafts of leather. I have to try hard to avoid the top notes, which are very strong, so keep that in mind. I don’t detect much wood, moss, or castoreum. It’s a little “powdery,” so I assume that’s the iris. The floral elements are probably too blended to detect more than the lavender. It also seems to have a little amber softening it up, but don’t expect much sweetness here. Nor is there much in the way of spice. It does seem to have a little patchouli blended in, but the vetiver must be minimal. If you want a bitter leather, I suggest Francesco Smalto. This one is closer to Oscar Pour Lui or VC&A Pour Homme, but this one is blended better (I’ve only tried the new VC&A PH and I think that one is clearly inferior to the others). Longevity is quite good but with fair “sillage”/projection at best. One thing that’s good is that it never goes into that “soapy lavender” area that so many of these “80s power frags” do. The only criticism I have is that I’d like to smell more of the notes listed clearly, but that’s my preference, and I consider it a minor flaw, though of course the perfumer may have been trying to create this kind of smooth fragrance. Note that this one is clearly “formal,” and most young guys will probably not like it, or if they do, will not find many occasions to wear it.