To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
SopLuldemedom – :
There’s clearly lavender here and I think the BN note pyramid is more accurate. There’s a kind of minty quality at first, probably “green note,” basil, and perhaps something else, then I get an obvious fougere accord. The florals soften things up but aren’t obvious (other than lavender), but it is clearly herbal. There is some sweetness but the idea seems to like using salt to enhance food items. Fortunately (for those like myself, who don’t want a powerful fougere scent), the fougere accord is just element that offers contrast to the others. Some might say it’s grassy but for me the other elements are much stronger, and I don’t get any galbanum here. Strength is at least good. Over time it softens up and it becomes a touch powdery, though largely retaining the initial presentation. Overall, I really like it, but I haven’t been in the mood for these kinds of scents over the last few years, preferring gourmands, leathers, orientals, and tobacco scents.
olga1401 – :
No. This is from the 1992 I presume. Firsts nineties by sure. It is one of three fragrances came out all togheter (red and blue the others), it was not so usual that time. It was considered an hazard came out with three fragrances. All three were exploring one particular dimension of a family but in a classic and no fashion way. Are made for office & house men. Who loves country side, fireplace, a book, whiskey and talk, a clean shirt, that’s it.
The green is a sort of warm forest, simple comforting and well done.
P.S.: by Chance 2006 it is also the date we find on basenote with sames notes as above … You shouldn’t do a bad copycat (actually there you find a messy of two henry Cotton’s In Green one of 2006 and one of 1989)
Anyway I have found the fragrance is of the 1989 and the notes seems to be
Green notes, Basil, Cumin, Bergamot, Lavender
Fir, Jasmine, Juniper, Thyme, Geranium, Rose, Carnation
Leather, Patchouli, Cistus, Moss, Amber, Frankincense, Musk
Or maybe
galbanum, lily of the valley, ivy, grey pepper, cypress, tarragon,
wormwood, cedar, patchouli, thyme, sage, bay leaf
pine resin, labdanum, musk.
I love because on internet you find many different formulas and maybe also in cartaceous… That is why, word aparts, a perfume is always a mystery.