To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Юрец11231811 – :
Oh MY! This one I LOVE and will save my measly 15ml-ish remains from the vintage bottle I just received. It is the square, rock-ish outside, with the burgandy/gold mixed top. Loooooovely! I will most definitely save this exquisite juice for special night occasions :o) Truly lovely. Does anyone know how different the vintage and the reformulation compares? Thanks for any information!
Mewdj519Unlogrere – :
I have also the bottle from 70-s. Not the bottle in the picture. It’s dry mossy and I feel something like tobacco, not smoky but woods.
It’s my first real perfume. So fine, so sofisticated and fresh. Strong. In a glass and stylish bottle. Wow!
And now I have some 🙂
Kuzyshyn – :
My bottle of this obscure scent is the original parfum flacon, which is shaped like a rough chunk of glass or ice. It is shown in the vintage illustration above, the one with the woman in the paisley pantsuit. Most of the notes and reviews listed here seem to refer to a later and clearly different formulation. The original version is a smoky, woody and intensely mossy Chypre, not an Oriental at all. Fashion evokes a campfire at Woodstock, with notes of cedar, sandalwood, lots and lots of moss, a little jasmine, and patchouli. Don’t look for roses, iris, ylang-ylang, tuberose, or vanilla in this version of the juice–they’re not here. TheRealPaloma was reviewing the original version, too, and she’s absolutely right: this Fashion bears some resemblance to the original Crepe de Chine, but Fashion is drier and earthier than the Millot chypre and more leathery. The original Fashion is a tough, elegant, and uncompromising woody chypre–Cabochard’s 70’s daughter.
Lesa36 – :
The vintage version is a soft , classy and feminine lovely floral not on the sweet side and with some retro feeling : in one word , it is graceful . It can be still found for a nice price maybe because it has been undeservedly forgotten .
The vintage bottle has a uniform pale gray colored box . Its glass is beautifully gilded .
VladЫkin – :
The bottle you see shown here is a totally new fragrance, with a pronounced fruity floral character completely UNLIKE the original from the 1970s, which is crisp, chypre-like, and very sophisticated. This newish (peachy-musky)scent is like many others available in the 1990s, but the original Fashion was distinctive, and much more like Crepe de Chine with a more complex floral character. I have several bottles of the original one.
AffellIncotte – :
To my greatest joy, and after a 30-years-long quest, and, most of all, thanks to Fragrantica, I found my all-time favourite on E-bay. Thank God it has never been reformulated, and when I first smelled it, after so many years, it struck me how deep and warm it was. Some people recommend it for daily use, but I do not agree: in my opinion it is something to be worn sparsely, not to be worn for a big sillage. It is more a perfume for seduction… to have your partner close to you… That’s all that needs to be said…
mds202bedyWelty – :
This was my best perfume back in the seventies, and to my grrrrr disappointment, it’s production has been discontinued. As it is slightly similar to de Givenchy’s Amarige, yet with more warmth and depth, I’m going to try to make my own version… unless a miracle happens…
(gopstop1996) – :
Stupenda la vecchia versione, leggero e penetrante, femminile, romantico, retrò.
Suventry – :
A powdery peachy musky fragrance. (parfum 15 ml)
alex481988 – :
This is a soft, fruity and shinny fragrance. Perfect for day use.