To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Danehaoxjlyrk – :
I’m really enjoying this. Developed really differently to the initial aroma.
Very sweet, but with a more expensive undernote.Powdery and clean. I’m hoping that it projects more than a skin scent? I’d like to find something to layer it with, or find the spray?l haven’t been able to find it anywhere. An inexpensive way to try new scents and compositions… love these oils.
nikolaaaaay – :
Actually, the notes of ‘Bijou’ by Christian LaCroix match this better… as I do smell both pear and star anise in ‘Delightful’. It also reminds me of the feel of ‘Couture Couture’ by Juicy Couture- simply a pleasant, versatile, fruity gourmand that isn’t too “foody”, and is balanced nicely with calming woods and light florals over a pillow of respectful musk. Sillage on me starts off as soft-to-moderate, trailing off slowly to a woody-musk skin-scent by the 8-10-hour mark. I would tend to employ ‘Delightful’ as a daytime, cool-weather fragrance. Strong “like” from me (the “like very much” that is between “like” and “love”) and recommended to lovers of ‘Soft’ for a less-intense sugar-rush and a restrained sophistication.
pljusik – :
This is a light orange floral scent- starts slightly tropical with notes of citrus and morphs as the day wears on with stronger notes of sandalwood. I like it but it doesn’t charm me as much as Rawan, Choco Musk or Golden Sand. Still a great value. I am loving these Al Rehab oils. They also extend other fragrances when layering them.
Qwan-BeTeR – :
What a weird (as in unexpected) little oil. I put it on for the first time, I believe, because it smelled chemical and boring sniffing the rollerball.
But lo and behold, out comes something along the lines of Coco Mademoiselle. Not the same, I don’t think, but since I don’t have Coco Mad, I can’t give an exact.
I rubbed a bit on my wrists before bed, then immediately got the chocolate, but faint, so I rubbed more on my upper arms. Sniffing my arms closely brought a weird milk note and some chemical essence. But then it started to waft.
This is a lovely little gem! Sweet ND feminine and pretty much exactly how the notes sound. Light, sweet (but not “foody” gourmand) almost tropical scent.
Beautifully balanced and the chemical note (as is the case with Al-Rehabs in my experience) fades quickly.
Absolutely recommend for those looking for a western-influenced sweet, feminine, uncomplicated fragrance with some sexiness.
Solid like. Could be a love.
dengre – :
To me this one smells a bit like dark chocolate to behin with but the oil is not strong at all. Its lovely but is far too faint on my skin
Matvei – :
THIS one right here! Is one of the nicer Attars from the line. Not too fruity, Oudy, incense-y. It does have that dusty vibe like most of them.
It’s pretty straight-forward. Soft, freesia, sugar, and a suede-like note. Not old suede, or new. Just well kept. If you’ve ever smelled, “Iceberg the Fragrance for Women” (square-bottle), you are getting in the ball-park of this. Minus the body from the pistachio note. Longevity is Good.
kitaywolf – :
Very beautiful and sweet scent. To me the orchid, mandarin orange, and sugar notes are the most prominent. Later on the sandlewood and musk are more noticeable. Longevity is good, about 5-6 hours. Sillage is moderate.
Dadon – :
Blind buy bought on the basis that it had sugar in it and the votes for sillage were ‘enormous’
It is a lovely sweet scent that smells like wood and flowers on first application but it is a skin scent on me
aleksandr594 – :
Clean green, botanical scent. I bumped up the gardenia and freesia on the list. I’m not getting any of the almond or even much of the sugar. I prefer Full (green, aromatic jasmin). Something in Delightful is a bit off, but otherwise a nice fragrance.
SEVER2233 – :
I am enjoying this as it is quite intensely sweet and seems to have a prominent orange note. It is not a complex or mysterious scent and a small amount would probably be suitable for day wear any time of year. Worth trying for lovers of sweet scents and a great price.7/10
empincfiemy – :
I have the perfume oil version of this, and on paper, it seems like something I should like: I love white florals, musk, woody, citrus… but on my skin the sandalwood note (or possibly that, plus the almond) strongly dominates, and throws it all off. Definitely not a win with my chemistry.