To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
alegovka – :
A very elegant floriental. Like something Chanel could have made, had they decided to make a tuberose perfume in 1990. It’s not a big white floral, though, it is dominated by tuberose, but supported by other floral notes as well as amber and sandalwood. It also has a little bit of peach, just enough to make it warmer, and a hint of oakmoss, just enough to let you know this was made in another decade. I don’t get much spice, and no incense.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t develop all that well on me. The opening and first phase are lovely, but then it becomes a little sharp/sour on me, not much, but enough to bother me. Could be the lily-of-the-valley or the cassis leaf, two notes which generally don’t agree with me. I really wish I could wear it, it’s a wonderful perfume. I don’t find any similarities with Montaigne, it doesn’t remind me of anything else I know.
I was testing an edp mini.
саша1234 – :
An opulent scent perfect son of its time. It was labelled as “fur scent” because of its powerful impact, as strong as the old Opium, but very different.
Curiel by Raffaella Curiel, an Italian designer famous for her feminine creations and bride gowns, was very flowery and spicy, with a blasting opening of carnation and jasmine, becoming softer and leading to a spectacular drydown of amber and sandalwood with a pinch of vanilla that made everything soft and cuddling.
LOVELY