11 reviews for Classica Sospiro Perfumes

1. 

   Amogiania – 2022-06-30:

   3 out of 5

   Onestly… This fragrance smells like human poo… The same” KOUROS “for men smell like public toilette with urine on floor. I know human preferences are different and not discussable, but come on. Sometimes sophistication leads to grotesque and catastrophe. I believe there is thin group fans japanese skat movies who may like it. Generally sospiro fragrances are big disappointment ( xerjoff as well) Very nice artistic flamboyant bottles but fragrances itself – everage… For sure they are not worthy its price . Just beautiful bottles are worthy( if you snobb and collector)
2. 

   Imperator062 – 2022-06-30:

   4 out of 5

   It does smell like fecal , human fecal
   something that comes from the deepest darkest part of hell
3. 

   wrf437speagoessenda – 2022-06-30:

   5 out of 5

   Superb composition of tobacco, spices and herbs that leaves a wonderful animalic trail on the skin.
   really, really wonderful, if you are into animalics.
4. 

   андрей чухнин – 2022-06-30:

   5 out of 5

   Soooooo, basically this fragrance smells on me like sh*t , i’m not kidding, i can’t belive this is Sopiro, what they were thinking? .
5. 

   ssm – 2022-06-30:

   4 out of 5

   laughably bad frag from a sham luxury purveyor of bad smells. whoever spends the mega $$$ on this deserves to smell like this 😀
6. 

   Elegant48 – 2022-06-30:

   3 out of 5

   oh dear oh dear.
   what on earth were they thinking when they created this utter gopping concoction?
   surely somewhere along the line, someone at Sospiro who DIDNT have the flu, or suffered with hayfever mustve smelled this nasty junk and said WHOOOHAAAA, stop the production, a dead skunk has fallen in the vat!
   who on earth at fragrantica even listed the notes to choose from?? go smell it first, then tell me where the dog faeces, camel urine and scummy pond water are?
   this is so goppingly bad, i NEARLY puked, and had to scrub myself till i bled in the shower! i even tried tomato juice, as it works on skunk spray!!
7. 

   intom – 2022-06-30:

   4 out of 5

   فوق العاده تلخ و یکنواخته این عطر…اما سوسپیروه دیگه
8. 

   Flasssh89 – 2022-06-30:

   5 out of 5

   فوق العاده تلخ و یکنواخته این عطر…اما سوسپیروه دیگه
9. 

   stas.ru – 2022-06-30:

   4 out of 5

   Altough this creation’s name from of Xerjoff parent brands convey a clear objective of being a classic or emulating one, i would also nominate it as Sospiro FUmo too. Besides the clearly smoky ethos of this composition, this is a name that fits like a glove the overall Xerjoff strategy of industrialization of the luxe ostentatious fragrance, Sampling different lines from Xerjoff, i have notice what discern one from the other (and many times from creations from less expensive brands) is the product’s image, both in package as in price. It’s constructed something more exclusive aiming some certain notes nuances (totally or almost totally synthetics) in a way it doesn’t have massive appeal (which is already guaranteed from the price range). You aim the public tastes that will probably consume those perfumes and is willing to pay for it, even that they don’t cost too much to be made when you only see tha fragrance’s side.I understand that a fragrance cost is much more than just the formula cost, but 450 dollars in this case is much more related, as i said, with a position strategy than a higher quality in this case. Classica is yet another fragrance to combine tobacco, amber, wood, oud, rose and tobacco nuances. Here, there is still the use of some herbal tones to justify, i believe, the link between the alleged italian roots in this formula. This is a tobacco fragrance that goes into a drier and smoky direction, that use honey nuances, and a less clean musk. In some times i detect some references to the musk and wood structure of YSL M7 (in a certain way, an already oud classic). It seems to aim the arab and russian public, with creation powerful and even rich in nuances that is quite linear. I think that the purpose is create a smoke here, a magical effect that this is really expensive and luxuous. I understand that for many this might work very well, but for me is just an illusin that i can see through it. Is it bad? Not at all! But if i had 450 dollars in my hand, this wouldn’t be the first perfumes that i would think of buying.
10. 

    vodkaua – 2022-06-30:

    5 out of 5

    Im Still Unsure What To Think About This Fragrance….
    Balmy Smokey Woody & Tobacco Are The Dominant Forces Here.
    As It Drys Down More It Does Get A Touch Smoother / Sweet Guessing The Amber & Sandalwood Are In The Background Doing This And Oud Becomes A Touch More Noticeable Also.
    Projection Is Good.
    It Does Smell Classic I Guess Like A Well Off Gentlemen Sitting In His Cigar Room Full Of Wooden Furniture.
    *I Did Not Get Any Of The “Citrus Blast” Mentioned Below Nor Would I Say Ambergris Is The Dominant Note As It Lists Above At This Present Point In Time.
11. 

    kozak1972 – 2022-06-30:

    4 out of 5

    Classica opens with a blast of citrus and a herbal aromatic feel I think it comes from clary sage going over to dirty and skanky blend with copahu balm and ambergris but still aromatic , balsamic. After some time it becomes more balanced with noticable woodsy notes. Then in the last stage its alot of ambergris , tobacco some moss and a bit of oud still aromatic and balsamic. Kind of daring scent but much more interesting that Opera.