To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
plant2 – :
According to the brand’s website :
Top : Neroli, Bergamot
Heart : Styrax, rose, Ylang
Base : Moss, ambrarome, civet.
Beautiful aldehyde fragrance. Ridiculously low price but expensive smelling. Sillage and lasting power are good.
Лана – :
why is all the hate? while i am not head over heels for no 5 i find casandra to be a classic retro vintage powdery aldehyde that is simply gorgeous in its own rights first of al it smells like a perfume not a jumbalia of rotten frutes or synthetic tar chemical biproduct of industrialization !i dont have it next me me to revie it but i had many bottels in the past ten years or so and they all did the job perfectly they were amazing in layering and they smelled like houbigant and many of the chypres and aldehide powdery florals..i cant believ how the industry has changed and formed the youngers generation in to thinking that the synthetic smoky accords are the it thing and that old school or retro style is the bad thing ..its really sad to see this terible change in forced tastes but i am sure its only a matter of time untill people get fed up of smelling the same basic 3 sunthetic accords and want to go back to the real artistry of perfumery
Senyon – :
I found it awful, like a cheap scent from the 70ties , I gave it away , like an Avon scent, definitely for the lovers of real vintage scents.
It would be a cheap version of Chanel 5, in some respect.
tattizhe – :
my grandma has a bottle of this, it a pretty classic scent that lasts for a long time .
sportak15 – :
If you love soapy scents ( and i know some of you do ) you’ll love this one .
I usually like the Aldehyde group , but this is really too much for me , it is a bit resembling Chanel n°5 , but though i love n°5 EDT , i don’t like Cassandra 🙁
Юрас 1 – :
Cassandra is a very true dupe of Chanel No 5. If you like Chanel No 5 you simply can’t go wrong with it.
Longevity and sillage is pretty good. Indeed -just like the original- it’s such a heady fragrance that it can instantly give you a headache if overdone.