To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
sap_manager – :
So different from the 80s version, I could say is a totally different cologne. 80s was sweeter and masculine, this reformulation is something that i wouldn’t wear at all.
Megatorrent – :
I don´t know why but to me it smells like a leather infused with mandarin orange oil…delicious. Longevity and projection are not monstrous but still they´re pretty good (about 6-8 hours) as usual with the stuff from the 80s. For some reason I found it to be exceptionally suitable for rainy days.
9.25/10
Павел Ком – :
I like this fragrance. I get a boozy vetiver patchouli and cedar gentlemen’s fragrance a la old school 70’s style. Very Euro crisp clean and elegant.
The performance was just a little better than below average.
Sort of reminds me of Francesco Smalto in a way or at least the same genere.
Why didn’t I buy it ? The performance and longevity sucked. Amp it up and I would purchase this in a heartbeat……..” YAWN….SIGH….ZZZZzzzzzz”
psicho – :
Could anyone enlighten me about this wonderful woody fougere “old school” fragrance?
I’ve just received a new bottle and I can perceive a discordant and prominent sweet note (probably raspberry) which wasn’t present in previous bottles…is this sweet and jarring version of CCC an older or a new version of this masterpiece?
I would apreciatte any clue about this matter in order to keep including this joy in my top 5…thanks 😉
комарик – :
Lately, I’ve been looking at this fragrance at every department store in town, being sold indivually or in attractive sets that include shower gel, after shave lotion, soap bar, liquid talcum and a pocket container. But what really catches my eye is th siz of the bottle in those sets, from the traditional 3.4 (100 ml), 6.8 (200 ml) and 27.2 (800 ml). This a classic oustanding fragrance, that seduced my nose 30 years ago, when I was 15 and believe, I still like it as much as then, and can be worn all year long, both for day and night, at the office, casual formal dress code or an elegant evening. Juts like the publicity campaign says: the return of the gentleman.
Pro100slava – :
Cuando era pequeño, a principio de los 90’s mi papá usaba este perfume y me parecía delicioso. Cuando empecé a coleccionar fragancias compré una botella de Carlo Corinto y el aroma era exactamente a como lo recordaba pero mi nariz había cambiado demasiado, al grado de parecerme horrible el olor de esta fragancia.
Me parece un aroma a pino muy sintético y corriente, masculino sí pero nada placentero. Simplemente no pude con él aunque deseaba que me gustara. En fin, terminé por dárselo a mi papá.
mpw976speagoessenda – :
I think this composition has some similarities with Aramis. The result is very different, but just as powerful.
As I remember, it used to have less raspberry or maybe no raspberry at all… it was darker, something I miss in my new bottle (the other one was very old, maybe exposure to light modified it).
It’s very versatile, in this city you can wear it any season, any time of day.
Still great and powerful. Great value at that price range.
***
Me parece que esta composición es similar a la de Aramis. El resultado es muy diferente, pero igualmente poderoso.
Como la recuerdo, tenía menos frambuesa o ninguna… era más oscura, cosa que extraño en esta nueva botella (la anterior era muy vieja, quizá la exposición a la luz la modificó).
Es muy versátil, en esta ciudad la puedes usar en cualquier temporada, cualquier momento del día.
Es aún grandiosa y poderosa. Gran valor a ese rango de precio.
melvigen – :
Edit 22 oct 2011– Well , seems nobody has reviewed this fragance lately , so ill go again , now reviewing the new formula , the one now being sold as CARLO CORINTO CLASSIC , for starters , the fragance begans with a really loud cumin note , that i dont remember from previous editions , gone is the sweetness from the last reformulation ( thank god ), so i think the raspberry note is out… anyway is just now a really nice fougere , a little more discreet , but still great…
SSDF – :
A classic fougere , this one smells really divine .. if you’re not into 80s fragances you will not like it..anyway is kind of sweet , herbal and musky..to me , it brings the image of ferns…or a forest…