To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
ArthurLav – :
A very nice fresh woody-spicy fragrance that is great for warm days. Seems to have average longevity on my skin which is fine. Also a very inexpensive fragrance and easy to find. I do regret not taking this on my work trip this summer.
akkerman – :
I am sampling last few weeks and trying many frags. I have put this on me by accident, since I thought its my sample. It belongs to my hubby. On the other hand, I like this smell, it makes good chemistry with my skin. I love that fresh start and woody-spicy basic tones.
Rocduell – :
A light, somewhat fruity, and very soapy aquatic. This is pretty nearly Azzaro Chrome without the heavy metallic notes in the top, though they start to creep in a bit later. I don’t have my old bottle of Chrome around or I’d do a side-by-side, but they’re close enough that if you waved this in front of my nose and said it was Chrome, I’d believe you. Only well into the mid notes do I start to recognize a hint of the cedar and nutmeg of Visit, though again much lighter (thank god!). It has a little bit of the Lanvin Vetyver chemical presence, but really only a trace. Overall, it’s weak once you get past the top notes, and ultimately ends up being an “Eau de Grey Flannel” generic weak aquatic flanker of something else with name recognition. I don’t see why this was necessary since they already sell tons of Chrome.
euj212Unlogrere – :
Dirty aquatic that is dominated by vetiver but Bright Visit suffers from a profound weakness and lack of projection. Has herbal and aromatic elements with a dose of pink pepper that gives it a very green essence but unfortunately the performance on my skin is so sub-par that I get very little at all out of this and what I do get, basically just vetiver as a skin scent that fades out within an hour of application.
zanuda40 – :
As arigarj said A.Bright Visit can be the same cologne sold in Brazil as A.Aqua Forte. The bottle is the same in any details. About the smell of Aqua Forte, there´s not resemblance to A.Visit. It´s totally different. Soft,fresh,smooth woody notes with poor projection and longevity about 3 hours.
mamet2008 – :
Cedar and grapefruit. Nice for after a shower or freshen up.
Had body sprays that last longer but I still like the smell.
A little bit peppery in the drydown. A fragrance that no one would be offended by.
Appalling lasting power,less than 1 hr!
Glad mine was a bargain off e bay.
Will perhaps put in the car glovebox to use it up….
My rating.
Fragrance 7 out of 10
Longevity 2 out of 10
Projection( in first half hour) 6 out of 10
Vurlenik – :
English:
Some people say that Azzaro Bright Visit is known in Brazil as Azzaro AquaForte
Português:
Algumas pessoas dizem que o Azzaro Bright Visit é conhecido no Brasil como Azzaro AquaForte
Dorc – :
Azzaro Visit is one of my most fav perfume. and i also love Bright Visit. this is great for day time use. great sillage and longivity. if you like visit you can keep this for day time use.
xsione – :
UPDATE: This could have been a very good and interesting fragrance if it were not for its abysmal longevity, as it provides a genuine alternative to the usual citric and aquatic fragrances for summer. Curiously though, it does occasionally last for an acceptable time but this usually requires heavy spraying.
@khalidaman: This is the page for Bright Visit. I believe you are commenting on the original Visit (which I don’t think is superb anyway 🙂
mixay33 – :
Fresh and salty. This is for warm days and for sun comtemplate or a beach nights with a few friends, listening to the waves crashing, around a campfire. For the simple and delicious moments.For summer days, summer nights,afternoons, whatever. I love it so hard…
On me:
Sillage: Very Good
Longevity: Good (5h+)
Edit: Quite spiced but still cool
caleb587 – :
visit is superb !
Ellactro – :
clean, fresh, but I wouldn’t buy this for my boyfriend….
kirichencko-98 – :
A surprisingly ‘incompetent’ vetiver-based aquatic, and a pretty darn ‘bad’ fresh summer scent (to parody some reviews I found on another review website). I can barely contain my contempt for this complete waste of money. Probably the worst EDT I have ever owned – and I’ve owned several dozen from across the spectrum. I really wanted to love this because I love Azzaro fragrances generally and the bottle (in its 100 ml guise) and packaging are very cool. Nonetheless, who cares what it smells like when it lasts (no exaggeration) all of 20 minutes after at least a dozen sprays on my arm. Shameful. I thought this was because my nose had calibrated to it, but no one else around me said they could smell it either. Avoid like the plague!!
@Anywhereyouare: BV is indeed “like jumping from a shining skyscraper during an ordinary day”: i.e. a complete tragedy…
Yurchik – :
really fresh fragrance for everyday,….
maga_maga555 – :
Not as good as Visit.
АЮГ – :
It is indeed less smoky and fresher than Visit, but still it is woody with some oriental undertones to which a sensation of moisture is added. However, I would not classify this as aquatic. I also perceive some abstract fruity notes added to the original Visit. A good fragrance, not as spectacular as Visit, but it is more wearable and conveys a sensation of freedom.
Lush100 – :
I bought one and gave it away. I dislike it. I don´t know why, but it remembers me of old lime crushed in a talc bowl: warm, sweet, acid and powdery.
antopus – :
The light blue color of the liquid tells me much: another fresh and clean scent. In fact, this is very clean, everything well diluted in a pure water. I could say it has a lack of character, but someone would correct me and says something like: “you don’t expect that a breeze brings you a lot of smells, do you?”.
I spend some time trying this scent, to think it is a cold one (the opposite of happy). If you want something just peaceful (and peaceful is not the same as pleasant or enjoyable), this may be an option.
The reviewer Anywhereyouare got another, but also appropriate picture about this scenario.