To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Bruirerarge – :
This One reminds me of Fahrenheit Aqau and Mercedes Benz Intense but with less Longevity and silage plus its more wood… It a good cologne but not the best one from Armaf. What i like about this perfume is the vetiver and floral green notes at base.
Do i regret buying it? NOT AT ALL In $18 its not that bad plus its silage and longevity is better then MB Intense.
Its a 6.5 Out of 10 for me.
tanyasokol91 – :
I too have a bottle from an October 2015 batch. The scent is pretty much as reviewers on Youtube have described. Spicy, bright, Pineapple-Citrus and rich woods.
Yes it is a nice fresh fragrance with a nice ‘looking’ bottle but I agree not a practical nor tactile design at all. I have had to resort to removing the metal cap, collar and wooden shroud otherwise you end up with liquid pooling on the top of the bottle.
Longevity?….Mmmm ok’ish no better or worse than many mainstream or designer frags but not stand out.
Sillage/projection?….Very little at all really. From the outset you have a very close-up personal cloud of enjoyable wafts but in about 3 hours I have to put my nose to my arm in order to pick up any trail of the scent at all.
Bit disappointed with this to be honest because the woody notes in the base are very nice indeed but they need to be louder and prouder. I will try some other Armaf’s though – most likely the EDP’s and Niche range to see if they are stronger/longer lasting.
COITWORCE – :
Bought this base on a YT reviewer.
It’s an okay scent, but nothing to praise.
I’ll give it another week and post an update.
But as of now, it’s okay.
Perfect for work and the gym.
Will I buy this again? Nah!
I don’t hate it…but it doesn’t stand out much and it reminds me of a fragrance I already have.
I’ll have to dig through my collection to find what it smells like…..but i know, i have it.
This is a safe blind buy, if you like citrus
I do have two issues….
1. It’s an EDT and not a EDP.
When it comes to Armaf, I’m use to it being an EDP.
2. The sprayer/vaporizer sucks!
You’re going to get about a 1/5 of the juice on the bottle and the other 4/5 on you.
Oh well…I’ll live.
SKU Number: 6294015101560
Batch Number: 193468 (Production Date: 10/2015)
Age: 21+
Scent: 6/10 (Okay)
Value: 7/10 (Only cost $21.90 for a 100 ML)
Sillage: 6/10 (About a ten inches from my body aka personal space)
Longevity: 4/10 (Noticeable three hours tops)
Creativity: 6/10 (It’s okay)
Projection: 7/10 (An half hour tops)
Versatility: 10/10 (Anytime & anywhere, but bring a travel atomizer)
Compliments: NA/10 (None yet)