To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
romangking1111 – :
Gucci pour homme II with weaker performance.
HorbSordIrowl – :
I first smelt this one back in February, and I was immediately reminded of another fragrance: Gucci Pour Homme II. There haven’t been many other occassions where I smelt a fragrance that smells this similar to another. This is right up there with Cuba Gold/JPG LeMale, Creed Green Irish Tweed/Cool Waters/Bond No.9 Chez Bond, and Joop ph/Creed Original Santal.
If you like Gucci PH II, this is worth checking out. It’s smooth. A little spicy. But cool, and warm, interestingly. It’s worth buying if you can find it at a decent price. I would definitely try GPH II in addition to this one tho. They’re pretty much interchangeable.