Description
Known for his beautiful star-shaped refillable flacons made of glass, Thierry Mugler will thrill his public and fans of the famous Angel from 1992. The new edition arrives in Spring 2015, Angel Eau de Parfum Ressourçable, in a bluish flacon that keeps the oriental-gourmand composition of the fragrance Angel. After the first edition that thrilled all gourmands, Thierry Mugler paid attention to numerous versions of the original to satisfy the taste of all fans of the house.
The main composition is work of perfumers Olivier Cresp and Yves de Chirin offering irresistible palette of fruity notes, sweet notes, flowers and warm gourmand accords. Creamy chocolate shades blend with red berries, melon, blackberry and citruses, while highlighting peach, apricot, plum and thick, sweet flowers in the heart. Chocolate in the heart intensifies the lust of gourmands and is additionally sweetened with caramel and honey. Patchouli, resins and vanilla are in charge of elegant charm and warmth.
The new glass star plays on light and shades, and with its polished facets maintains attention and encourages admiration. Top notes of the composition accentuate bergamot, preceding juicy red berries, soft and sensual vanilla and patchouli, announced as the key notes of the composition. The new refillable flacon is just one in the line of beautiful creations by the house of Thierry Mugler enchanting us from year to year. The fragrance is available as 75 ml Eau de Parfum.
mahovik – :
I don’t know what it is about this scent. I love all the ingredients, the group it goes under, but it doesn’t want to work on my skin. I bought it hoping it would change once i owned it… But even if you love everything in a scent, it doesn’t mean it’ll smell great or that you’ll like the smell of it on yourself. I really wish i could love this Angel, somehow make it work for me… but i can’t. It smells faintly of bo on me and others have claimed so as well, i know. But i know this scent can smell amazing on some other people, just not on me. It’s an unfortunate truth, but even if you’re desperate for a scent to work on your skin, it won’t always be the case. Amazing work on the refillable bottle though.
teac008 – :
The reviewer claiming this version is different is wrong. I own a bottle of this and have worn Angel since its release in 1992. The formula hasn’t changed, as the company states, and is just as exquisite and long-lasting as ever. To claim they are lying borders on libel. Love this so much that I’m thinking of buying a second bottle, even though it’s refillable. Such an amazing scent. Chocolate, patchouli, and flowers … so divine!
a080ex – :
My mother wears this as her signature and she admits that she doesn’t smell it on her anymore after all this time. I can reassure you, that people around you CAN smell it for at least 12 hours. Angel is a beast.
riw257Unlogrere – :
Muncierobson – Thanks for the comment. I bought mine from Escentual too. I thought the same as you, but after a day in the office running like a headless chicken, some colleagues could still notice my perfume even though I only sprayed in the morning.
Same thing happened last summer when a female friend gave me a hug and said I smelled lovely. I could not smell any hint of Angel on me, but she could.
So could it be that we are “bathing” so much in Angel that we have become nose blind?… And also, maybe for those who do not wear this beautiful gem, since they are not used to it they detect it straight away? Hence the importance of not putting too much on…
Please keep us posted, it will be interesting to hear what Mugler says.
In the meantime I’ll carry on spraying 😉
NeartyPlert – :
Beautiful and mesmerising as you would expect of Angel. I agree with Muncierobson on the fact that Angel seems to have toned down a bit. This certainly allows guys like us to wear it. However, I completely disagree with the comments saying it is a flanker and a different version to the original. Same old, but smoother.
Love this one!
suka72 – :
Modern Angel formulation in a new bottle.
Bottle is hard to hold and makes spraying difficult for smaller or older hands. Hope they never discontinue the lay down star. It does look like a sculptural piece of art though. Mugler gets presentation in a sea of plain bottles.
Ddimmikk – :
So I decided to buy this beautiful star after I ran out of my last 1.7 oz star from 2005 and well I’m sad to say that this isn’t my Angel. This is a vague copy of the scent I adore. On my skin all I get is a really dusty patchouli and maybe 30 minutes of cocoa powder which is reminiscent of the taste of fragrance and then it vanishes. Longevity is poor I get 4 to 5 hours. This is such a disappointment 🙁 a masterpiece stripped of its complexity.
gib158JeomiWogkig – :
Just called Mugler and yes to all the people that are saying it’s the same Angel ! It is. It’s just a new bottle , like a collectors bottle. Exact same fragrance. Refillable and all.
Notes listed here on fragrantica are wrong.
enverhoorehot – :
Quite confusing. What is the name of this? Rechargeable star? I looked on macy’s website and they call the one in this bottle “new star” = ? Someone else is saying gravity star.
cdyuk84 – :
It’s just a 75ml of the same fragrance. Many websites call it Gravity Star. It’s said to be a permanent product.
There is also a new 100ml bottle that’s vertical.
hahol-80 – :
Angel 2015=Angel 1992.
I have “old” angel and new angel.
I feel no distinction. The bottle is beautiful.
snally – :
I haven’t smelled Angel for very many years, just when I spray it in store. I have never liked it enough then to buy Angel and I still don’t. It actually brings out my BO and it stinks. The liquid in Gravity Star is heavenly compared to the Angel I’ve smelled over the years. It compliments my body chemistry rather than bringing out the worst. I will always cherish this bottle.
МАХАЛЫЧ – :
I think it’s a reformulation because the 2015 flanker smelled sweeter & the patchouli wasn’t as strong. Is this the destiny of all TM fragrances?….So Sad 🙁
Tempo – :
Still the same classic Angel but the new bottle is truly a work of art!
vwp102Diobtetty – :
It is so annoying to see people have voted for notes before something has even come out. On a side note, why does it have different notes? I thought it was the same perfume in a new bottle
GOQOR05 – :
I bet it’s not a new fragrance