To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
vadimos2002 – :
Why is it there are some scents that smell well made start to finish despite the price (I love love, Bronze, The de Vignes, Sunflowers, Vanderbilt, Halle) and then others that are just nothing but ghastly caustic fumes?
The original; PE 360 was good quality even if the scent itself was a little prickly so I bought this one expecting the same…..wrong, wrong, wrong…
This is a cheap smelling synthetic fruit and roses catastrophe.
I understand why no nose wanted to claim it…it’s plain awful.
Подтуркин – :
Sweet, fresh-smelling fruity floral. Almost like a very fresh-smelling (non-creamy) hand soap. Nice, but a little generic. I prefer this over Perry Ellis 360 Coral, though.
limonti – :
I was initially put off by the peach scent in this but I’ve recently fallen in love with this. I’m not sure if it’s a difference in weather or other products I was wearing but now it smells very raspberry, sweet, and musky. I like it. Good sillage and mild longetivity.
johney – :
Clean white floral, I love Lily of the valley, mimosas, and peach . Little soapy boat I enjoy that . Just wish it was a lil powdery also .
ogaglo – :
Smells very similar, could pass for a twin of Paris Hilton perfume. This is quite nice. Not very unique but pleasant.
terkinva – :
Bit disappointed with this. Blackberry is there to start with but quickly disappears. I am left with something I don’t like on my skin. Not sweet. More bitter fruit. Not for me
894071737 – :
It is an okay scent. Smells like dirty peach to me.
Liftorieninty – :
love, love, love!!!
Rashgild – :
I love this perfume it’s great. Wonderful spring and summer fragrance. Catches the attention of others in a good way. I really love it. I took back two other perfumes before I found this one lol 🙂 It’s a keeper.
nemesis1986 – :
I have never been a big fan of Perry Ellis fragrances…they just don’t seem to sit right on my skin and usually always have what I call a, “fruity-farty note”. It’s a kind of overly,ripe and overly sweet-turned gassy smell ( the “Be Delicious” perfumes have this too). This one has a bit of that going on but aside from that….it’s blackberry incense from the corner head-shop.Or any one of the fruit-scented suave shampoos. Not terrible but I could live without it.
Zippo – :
Thank you fragrantica for putting this fragrance on the list. I bought it almost a year ago since I really love the color, it’s purple! I’m not a fan of sweet fragrance, but it is an exceptional for me.