To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
balkonreont – :
I think NYC 212 is a very uninteresting, almost cheap smelling perfume. There is nothing to it.
I would suggest that you buy something else.
bucha23 – :
I’d just buy it for the bottle tbh… lame I know.
clever65 – :
I don’t understand why the 212 nyc perfume isn’t listed on here. I just bought the edt, and it looks exactly like the regular 212. The only difference in the packaging is that “nyc” is written under 212. The original 212 smelled really bad to me. I don’t think this is good in the winter. This will probably smell best in the summer but I’ll put it away until the spring.