To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
banderes – :
The administrator should consider requiring users to revise comments that criticize the price of a perfume. I’m referring particularly to cliched statements such as:
“It smells good but it’s not worth the price…”
“There’s nothing about this to warrant the ridiculous price…”
“Don’t bother, you can get [fill blank] for a fraction of the price…”
If you think there is nothing about a Clive Christian that justifies the high dollar value, you might find it interesting to research the market value of some of the key ingredients. The supply is low and the demand is high. That means expensive, from what I heard.
This site is for fragrance reviews, not bargain advice. I suppose the two can overlap, but perhaps they shouldn’t. Just because you don’t think something is worth the price doesn’t mean someone else won’t. What does it even mean to say that a luxury item is “not worth the price”? Is a diamond?
gogycrolfcino – :
This is a fragrance that I really like but I used to love. Not only has the fragrance itself changed over the years, but so have my tastes. It doesn’t smell as expensive as it used to. I don’t know what they changed, but the citrus used to be more masculine and fresh.
It does smell really good still. If I’m putting on a suit, then this is a must. I just wish it lasted longer. I get a few hours max out of this one.
rita – :
UPSCALE FRESH
I reviewed this fragrance a few years ago, and I don’t think I appreciated its well crafted beauty. It’s both light and deep. What a puzzlement!
That doesn’t mean I will rush out to get a bottle. I probably will never buy a bottle. And not because of the price. (After all, I’m willing to shell out major bucks for Creed).
What it comes down to, for me, is that even though I think 1872 is a beauty, it’s not me. And I realize now it’s not the fresh and natural fruits. (I love the ‘fruits’ in Aventus, for example). My problem (and this is just that – MY problem) are the flowers. Once the initial (short lived) fresh citrus opening dissipates, the flowers make themselves known and I’m just not a fan of flowers taking a prime spot in a fragrance.
But if you love a sophisticated, deep, light, fresh, citrus/floral fragrance – 1872 for men should go straight to the top of your list.
jdanovds – :
It seems that Clive Christian takes some really famous and valuable offerings and forcely blends them together. YSL pour Homme (1979), Chanel Egoiste Platinum, Armani AdG, anymore? If my memory serves me right, it smells like L’Occitane Shampoo (oil-control).
I am not going to deny its over-complexity, but it’s way too chaos and unbalanced.
Maybe the quality of CC is slightly better than the average of high-end designer, say Hermes and Dior, however you cannot expect much margins.
Nothing mindblowing but very pissed for the price it has been made.
Rating: 4.0/10
gluplepleTota – :
This is incredible! Wow. I can’t tell individual notes too well due to the really great blending in this but I think I smell the prominent notes of lime, petitgrain, bergamot, peach, rosemary, and clary sage. It smells both very old-fashioned and very sophisticated at the same time. It is a citrus fragrance with herbal undertones and reminds me of Acqua di Parma Colonia. It’s just incredibly well done and smells so beautiful. Sillage is strong while longevity is also fantastic, running at over 12 hours on my skin. Overall this is one of the best citrus colognes ever made.
5/5
сва – :
I own and wear most of Clive Christians cologne for men. Although, I like 1872 I don’t wear often because it is not distinctive or bold. That’s just my personal taste. If you’re looking for an everyday fresh citrus scent this is definitely a great choice.
Nelson74 – :
********************گالری نارسیسا********************************
********************واردات و پخش عطر و ادکلن اورجینال*************
با سلام و احترام کار جدید کلایو کریستین پیور پرفیوم
گروه رایحه : چوبی
طبع : گرم
جنسیت : مردانه زنانه
نوع عطر : پرفیوم خالص
فصل استفاده : فصول سرد سال
سال ساخت : 2006
حجم : 30 میل
ماندگاری : عالی
پراکندگی : بسیار خوب
که بسیار لاکچری هست در نارسیسا به تعداد محدود موجود می باشد………
##############################مارا دنبال کنید#####################
igor 1111 – :
I bought this for my husband and we both love it. Refreshing citrusy scent with a herby undertone. Very sexy. Definitely for a younger person.
Ryslan7739 – :
This is my first Clive Christian. Opens up very fresh and citrusy – for me, it evokes a Acqua di Parma Colonia feel. Within minutes I get a sort of soft creaminess in the background which starts to dominate as the citrus softens. Can’t really pick out notes (and notes on Fragrantica seem different to those on the official Clive Christian listing?). I just get a creaminess which I can’t describe, perhaps the sandalwood? It is certainly not vanilla – just a soft almost whipped feel mixed with the citrus. Either way, to describe the scent is literally as a sweet, citrus and creamy perfume.
I do like this, and so does everyone I asked to smell it however the one MAJOR issue – performance. My skin does not hold fragrances well, but this did not last – I sprayed about 4mls in one go and it was gone within 4 hours whilst sillage was probably barely 2hrs. The reviews below suggest this is a beast although interestingly basenote reviews tend to mention the poor performance. I agree!
So, for the money, it doesn’t last long enough. So I won’t buy another bottle. But it does smell good whilst it is around!
Inallsparmjali – :
A lovely perfume from CC, which is very sweet and as far as citrus fragrances go, is quite long lasting.
Sadly, when the packaging changed in recent months, the price of the 50ml bottle increased overnight by £40 in the UK and the 100ml went up by £75. Now, every time I wear it, I ask myself whether this is special enough to justify paying £350 for 100ml in future and I’m thinking not.
It is both old fashioned, yet timeless and if the price doesn’t bother you, do consider it.
79606873992 – :
BRILLIANT ! 10/10 on all aspects
Pricey for sure, but worth every penny
Projection is huge and sillage is as well
Draws huge complements, as it should !
#Perfection
kosoj458 – :
Finally a proper masculine fragrance!
Classic style done in a very modern way.
1872 has a real timeless quality yet remains completely relevant.
While it doesn’t come across as dated at all it would feel just as “at home” in the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s.
Very dapper, debonair, and confident.
1872 doesn’t make you feel like a man…., it makes you feel like the man.
Bergamot and citrus dominate the top.
Slightly Sharp, juicy, and green with a nice bitterness that is rounded off by a beautiful lavender.
It took me a few weeks of wearing before I picked up the pineapple but now I do for sure….which makes it different and adds just the right amount of sweetness (a perfect blend with the patchouli and amber in the base)
This one never goes “too sweet” or “too floral” nor does it go “too citrus” or “too spicy”.
Performance is great. 3 sprays and you’re set for the day with moderate sillage.
Super versatile and can wear well anywhere or anytime of year by the right type of person.
Quite simply a Master class in masculine perfumery.
Worth every penny
sased111 – :
Someone referenced my review below, and then I noticed my review had disappeared. I own 1872 and it truly is like a spicy, less aquatic version of Acqua Di Dio. Fragrances are very subjective as people perceive them differently. Personally, I disagree that this is a typical citrus fragrance, and I certainly wouldn’t use fruit cocktail to describe it. It’s very spicy, herbal, and dry. There is nothing juicy about it. It’s a difficult fragrance to describe. Absolutely test this before buying it.
inhepropype – :
Incredibile…questa roba ti fa viaggiare indietro nel tempo!acquistato all’incirca un anno fa’ mi sembra di possederlo da secoli..1872…dice tutto.
L’atmosfera e’lontana e passata.
La qualita’non si discute,il drydown sulla pelle e’ un piacere e sui vestiti rimane agrumato per molto tempo.
Un profumo firma ma difficile da indossare quotidianamente.
Dura da mattina a sera e oltre.
Nonostante sia il piu economico della casa, buonissimo e di ottima fattura sconsiglio l’acquisto cieco.
Try before buy.
вадим иванов – :
CC 1872 for men is top, top class. It opens herbal/green and through flowers accords, it reaches a woody and creamy base (more to the sweet side due to musk and amber, like “sweet butter” but not cloying). The whole composition is elegant, and it garners a lot compliments every time I wear this one.
Sillage and projection are heavy in the first 2-3 hours, and stay more intimate (but still detectable to others) after that. Longevity is amazing, easily 15+ hours in the skin.
Vladmnepofugy – :
The top notes are kind of dirty and richly sophisticated blend of scents, but on me it quickly turns into a very grassy smell. Grass on my skin makes me itch, so… no. I like it, but I’d never buy it.
FriendJohn – :
This is extremely high end – it pretty much is on a level that would be difficult to match. Because it’s (almost) all natural, it has a presence and a vibe that most probably have never encountered since just about anything else out there is at least 70% synthetic or more.
It’s not for everyone. The opening is bracingly dry and antiseptic – a blast of lime, pepper and pungent rosemary. This is what catches people and makes it seem so immediately old fashioned.
After that , unusual florals come out and finally woods, mosses and spices in the base. This smells a hundred miles deep – layer upon layer of notes. It never entirely loses the aloof dryness, although it does mellow out and soften quite a bit.
Don’t be fooled by phrases like fruit cocktail, buttery smoothness, citrus blast etc. It’s not that these are inaccurate . It’s more they will lead to you think of existing fragrances that you know that fit those descriptions. This isn’t something familiar, and those comparisons don’t work.
This is altogether regal, strange, and takes getting used to. It’s quite an experience.
If you are under under 25, I’d almost say forget it altogether. Anyone else, sample it if you can. It takes a while to be comfortable enough with it to make a decision on it.
Despite the marketing the company uses, which of course doesn’t sit well with some – it does imply some accountability. They have to live up to it – or be dismissed as a joke or a con job.
Clive Christian does live up to these standards, I’ll give them that. . They don’t fool around at this house.
hly237Negeltzex – :
‘1872’ for Men bursts forth with an elegant citrus accord which is both refreshing and exuberant to encounter. Bergamot, grapefruit, lime, and mandarin can all be found dotted with spicy accents of black pepper and nutmeg, the effect of which is sparkling and rejuvenating. Bergamot and lime seem to be at center stage, noticeably more prominent and lending a regal tone to the proceedings. Things veer from the citrusy to the aromatic/herbal as petit grain, lavender, rosemary and clary sage become apparent upon drying down. It is here that clary sage’s green, tea-like scent is bolstered by the inclusion of subtle florals including freesia, cyclamen, jasmine and tagete (marigold). The gentle and slightly sweet florals act as a perfect counterpoint, subduing the richly aromatic citrus, herbs and spices of the opening. Richly green and bitter cistus labdanum and deeply resinous olibanum are accompanied by amber, patchouli, cedar wood and musk, creating a masculine base for the composition to conclude on.
Clive Christian’s utilization of only the best natural ingredients in perfumery is readily apparent when experiencing ‘1872’ for Men. The fragrance is highly dynamic and engaging, with the blending of its ingredients superb. One can notice the time and careful attention the perfumer took when composing its architecture, as each note is elegantly balanced by others so as none stand out as cloying or brash. It certainly fits well within the parameters of a classic masculine chypre, having a citrus-laden opening, a middle centered around cistus labdanum, and a musky base. This provides an interesting contrast between the fresh citrus of the top and the woody-musky base. ‘1872’ for Men’s herbaceous and green characteristics fit well during warmer weather. It is notably invigorating to apply when one is battling remaining fresh despite the stifling humidity and heat of summer. As an “extrait de parfum” grade formulation, longevity, sillage and projection are all excellent. In summary, ‘1872’ for Men is a classic men’s fragrance which feels elevated by its unique and luxurious ingredients as well as by the deft hand of its creator. Any distinguished gentleman or fragrance aficionado would be bereft to miss this quintessential male scent.
Read my complete fragrance review at my personal blog
Fragranceemergency.blogspot.com
busenka183 – :
It really justifies its name, this fragrance would had been a very good choice in 1872 but in 2016 pls dont throw your hardly earned money on even the sample.
This is an old soul,very old, mixed with some sweet citrus notes and finally becomes a medicine of stone age.
9maxx9 – :
I like this fragrance. I picture an elegant gentleman in the age category 25+ who is a bit playful, but with classic style. You will wear this fragrance as you wear a classic white or blue shirt and know that your personality is enough without attention-hungry features. This fragrance will make you and those whom end up in your personal space to feel just comfortable elegance. This is a fragrance that preferably worn in the daytime during the spring and can be worn under little chilly evenings and nights during the summer.
The only negative thing I have to write about this fragrance is that the Patchouli is too prominent for my nose, and I am unfortunately quite sensitive to this note. If Clive would get the idea to remove this note, I would gladly buy the 1.7oz bottle (I currently have the 1/3oz).
I strongly recommend you to try it:)
Dexyshorgesee – :
After trying this out at Saks today I could not get out my head how familiar this scent was to me. For hours i thought about it until it finally hit me. It’s nearly identical to Eau de Cartier Concentree. I personally wouldn’t buy this since i remember getting bored of this scent and eventually gave it away. I would say that the longevity and sillage are equally …… Beast mode on both.
nazar1408 – :
Tried this yesterday in Fortnum & Masons and it is beautiful. In the tradition if a cologne type smell and I have to say smelling somewhat dated but you can tell the quality through and through.
It just reeks of quality, it smells like nothing else and the projection and sillage are enormous.
It’s very fresh and zingy to start with but settles into a lovely fresh mandarin, lavender and Clary sage summer cologne smell.
At £110 for 30ml it’s not cheap but it lasts like nothing I have tried before.
Gonna have to save up for this but I want it.
extenza – :
@1872 & other niche fragrance gathers and detractors.: guys, rather than “throwing salt” for the sheer fact some of these niche frags command a pretty penny- would it not be far more productive to give us an honest assessment of your take on these scents without words such as “disgusting, garbage or not worth it”?!?!?! Cause I’m sure you wouldn’t view it as such if it were $49.99….. IMO of course……..
Ptiteshka – :
@Mariotgomez: I love your review….. I agree with so much of what you’ve said. Having just gotten a sample from Bergdorf Goidman a couple weeks back, I can say the following thus far:
For me- it’s a refreshing, relaxing & easy-to-wear perfume for every day and all occasions. The Petit Grain is a classic and the grapefruit note is FANTASTIC in this one (even better than the grapefruit in Terre D’Hermes Hermes and Bleu De Chanel IMO of course) . I’m not usually a fan of black pepper (preferring pink pepper), but I MUST SAY the Lavender, Jasmine and Clary sage, gives it that smoothness, slight creaminess and depth….. I do believe after trying it a few days that these very notes have a lot to do with 1872’s unusual longevity for a citrus-based scent….. And yes, I DID keep smelling my hand and thinking as you did: “this us what true perfume is all about”……………
Messk810InsuffBooni – :
realy love this fragrance… its fresh scents but not sharp to the nose.
Saint_Hix – :
I love this scent… Its bursting with citrus. But lets be honest, It really doesnt matter what I think of it, because it cost more then my car payment. If I had that kind of money to throw around I would help the homeless not fatten this perfume houses pockets.
LiliputNewGenius – :
FRUIT COCKTAIL
I get the authenticity of this niche house – there is no denying the natural, well blended notes.
But there is something bothering me about 1872, and I can’t put my nose around exactly why I only appreciate this fragrance but am not enthusiastic about it. I’ve been wearing it for hours now (has A+ longevity), and all I’m still getting is a really elegant (but every day wearable) fruit cocktail.
gzm923speagoessenda – :
I feel like this is a more sexy version of Millesmie Imperial, smells like buttered orange blossoms with a little spice. Sure there other fresh fragrances on the market, but this is a noticeable step above then all, especially in longevity. I showered and this still remained on skin for hours.
Absemsbatty – :
People think this smells like Adidas Sport Field? Really?
tarannoge – :
This is one of the best perfume I have in my collection. I have lots of perfumes but have to admit that this is really a beautiful art piece. I will say in short, the perfume lasts long. In fact I had sprayed three squirts in the evening at around 7pm and went out for a meeting and came back home and went to bed. I could still smell the fragrance in the next morning and was still noticeable. I went to bath and then it faded a little but could still smell in lightly. So powerful is the fragrance. This is my honest opinion.
Vasiljev1972 – :
Day 2 of owning a bottle of this juice and feel I need to be a little more descriptive. I can understand why some people would say that the longevity of this is quite poor for the price. I think this is due to the powerful and explosive opening which projects well and fills any room.
After 1-2 hours these fireworks do die down quite rapidly and so does the overall projection. This dramatic change could fool the mind of the user to feeling that the frag has just “gone”. This certainly isn’t the case.
Over the course of 8 hours, I’ve asked independent people to give there honest opinion of the scent and its potency on my skin, all of which where very positive. Yes the projection does not hold to the initial radius of the first couple of hours but it still projects adequately after this.
I do tend to go for fresh, citrusy scents, especially through the summer and I know not to expect longevity. My favourite scent this summer has been Acqua di Parma – Arancia di Capri. I did get a 150ml bottle of this in anticipation that it wouldn’t last on my skin but surprisingly it held very well and in my opinion is one of the nicest summer scents n the market. In the evening I’ve been waring Creed Aventus, this never fails to attract compliments.
I love these two fragrances but 1872 is certainly in a different league. The scent feels so natural. At first there is a burst of exhilarating, awakening ingredients, like colourful brazilian carnival. After dried down, it is so fresh and light, but at the same time is still so sophisticated, with a beautifully synergy of fresh citrus, green & floral and a clean, almost powdery finish.
Is it worth £170 for 50ml? Maybe not, but this juice is absolutely stunning and for a fresh, lighter frag the longevity can not be shunned in my. I have quite a selection and this is certainly the nicest frag I own and I’m thoroughly looking forward waring it.
daimvader – :
Had a dilemma today between this, Tom Ford Tuscan Leather and Acqua di Parma Colonia Intensa Oud. Had to buy 50ml of this and I have to say, 7 hours after a couple of sprays and I have no regrets. Really fresh and deep defined notes. Got lots of compliments all ready….
santiago – :
CC nothing special except the price :).
qdr199elipseskism – :
Ummm…. Why is this so expensive? It’s a normal scent. Nothing exciting. Good for a summer day that’s about it. It’s citrusy and fresh. Doesn’t last long. Too expensive.
Khloe_fromAC – :
Personally, I feel the gender binary delineation for this and its sister fragrance is unnecessary – the ‘female’ version is much more appealing in my humble opinion – less stuffy, cloying, more green, citrus fresh and redolent of a beautiful summer morning when the fragrance you most covet is one that reflects beautiful greens and vibrant citruses – try both and see what you think…
seaways – :
The longevity is pretty bad. You have to reapply it every 4 hours.
pro100sipa – :
I’ve ordered all 3 Clive Christian perfumes directly from CC website. It was my more expensive order of perfumes (EUR 1,500). I did it after I’ve got the samples of them from Bologna antique niche perfumery after I’ve ordered there CC 1872 perfume 30ml in crystal bottle (another EUR 650). When you wear the perfume of CC for the first time, you don’t really like it (it’s very different from all other perfumes, where the head notes are very pleasant and you immediately buy them, but after an hour, or even worse: after you’ve purchased it, you understand that you don’t really like the main notes). Like I told here, CC perfumes are really different: you start to love them after you are wearing them at least for 30 min. So, ask for samples and try to wear them for a whole day, then decide if you like them. I’m sure you will!
vop820elipseskism – :
Clive Christian 1872:
After testing once wanted to buy the legendary cologne. Green smells too much I’m not interested, but decided I liked to come in 1872!
After 10 years and after that I was at the Hermes boutique, I realized that Voyage d’Hermes similar to 1872 but with prices around $ 100 and not $ 800!
1872 cologne is balanced and green-peppery smell and longevity is pretty good, but that comes to those who are collectors cologne and perfumes like everyone to collect!
If you have not test it have not lost much.
Can cologne similar to the price it can find much cheaper.
hoobiaCic – :
1872 was describe to me by the fragrance sales person I have been going to for the past 4 years as “a refreshing, easy-to-wear perfume for every day and all occasions.”
It is a masterpiece! If you want a true perfume and willing to pay $310 to $850 for a bottle. I will begin saving up for this one.
From the very first spray, you will be sent on a journey of citrus, green and spice notes. Every time you smell it, you will say: “this is what a true purfume is all about.” Each note develops and blend with the previous one.
The perfume stays very close to the skin making it good for “every day and any occasion.”