To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
artetskaf – :
There are some genuine, inexpensive and quality products in the world. This is one of them. A unique, lovely fragrance for men that lasts. It’s smooth, soapy and spicy with a lovely masculine silage. Do not underestimate this juice because of its price. Fabulous!
bouncer – :
There are, of course, several ways to judge a fragrance. Judging by scent alone, this plucky floral might scrape into my top 30. But based on value for money, Worth Pour Homme is my uncontested number one perfume.
I don’t think there is a better fragrance widely available for under £20. So at the princely sum of £6.99, which it cost me, it was a steal.
Perhaps not one for the desert island dream, but a godsend for those of us pursuing quality and class on a budget.
othetuehogs – :
Really, really pleased with this. Way better and more wearable than many of its more well known early 80s contemporaries. I had this one on my wish list for a while, mainly owing to an association with the first scent I remember from my childhood, my mom’s Je Reviens, also by Worth. I was afraid this was going to smell cheap and dated, but it really is neither. It’s an old school barbershop scent, but with a pleasant floral heart and a sleek synthetic edge. First application is somewhat concerning due to a slight rubber gasket accord. But when the cinnamon and florals open up, what a treat. It’s a very linear scent, which I don’t mind–you know exactly what you’re getting for the entire (rather generous) drydown. Truly masculine, herbaceous floral suitable for year-round wear. And it bears a family resemblance to Je Reviens! Worth tracking down for all vintage fougère lovers if you can find a decent price–mine was 27 USD shipped from England. Score!
GreedDV – :
A Conservative gentleman fragrance from the 80’s to English style …….
A classic fragrance with a good number of ingredients!
There are 3 unusual notes in the fragrance world of the typical 80s
Bergamot-lavender-oak moss trio! And these are brilliantly built around other notes as well ….
There is a very good balance in this hand! I think one of the most beautiful creations in the aromatic – fougere category! Its durability is surprisingly good and it is going through exciting phases of drying!
Sometimes it appears up to 1-2 webshops among the rarities, and it’s not that expensive, so whoever collects perfumes or simply likes the smells of the 80-year-old citrus-wood-fougere! Feel free to smell it, you will not be disappointed!
A little time travel in English in the suits of gentlemen when the aromas of the real man’s fragrances were conservatively constructed and the scents of that time inspired masculinity, firmness and power, but at the same time a tasteful and cultured expression of elegance and sophistication!
Maximum score from me.
A pearl that did not disappear, but could remain in this modern aquatic-lemon notes, directed by an emaciated and “unisex” world ……..
diabbankeviveujb – :
Ingredients: Alcohol Denat., aqua (water), Limonene, Linalool, Coumarin, Butylphenyl Methylpropional, Hydroxycitronellal, Eugenol, Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone, Hexyl Cinnamal, Citronellol, Citral, Evernia Furfuraceae Extract, Geraniol, Farnesol.
ngn315Bessinepome – :
I’ve been intrigued by scents made in the 1930’s since I read the autobiographies of Clark Gable and Errol Flynn. Those guys certainly knew how to dress and groom back 80 years ago. When I read that Worth cologne made it’s appearance in 1932 I thought I would give it a go. There is certainly a lesson to be learnt here about the clever marketing and pricing of today’s fragrance houses who make you part with £50- £100 to smell good. I paid just £6.99 for a 100ml bottle of Worth pour homme from the bottom shelf of a local store. At that price I wasn’t expecting much……how wrong I was!!!
This cologne is certainly one of the best clean, soapy “just out of the shower” fragrances I’ve worn. It’s incredibly well blended and packs a punch. Not dated in the least, it has the same intensity and pleasing notes found in fragrances costing 10 times more. The bottle design is very apothecary in style with ribbed sides and a quality sprayer. How Worth manage to make this so good at £6.99 beggars belief and just shows that quality doesn’t need to break the bank. A forgotten gem that could easily cost £50+ If it had a higher profile today. Hey but why should I complain. I can smell damn good and spend the rest of my money and buy a quality bottle of whiskey too.
fl1ght – :
This is one on the freshest, brightest, soapy fragrances you will come across. It’s an old fashioned fougere that won’t appeal to anyone under 40 years of age. I have always enjoyed nutmeg and cinnamon, but when they are combined together it becomes impossible not to love. Pine, oakmoss and cedar also feature heavily. The rather popular (at the time) late ’70’s Mandate is EXACTLY like Worth Pour Homme.
I think this stuff is absolutely beautiful. 10/10
xxq551bedyWelty – :
It seems there are several variations of “Worth Pour Homme” floating around out there. I picked up the tall, narrow, four-sided (each side is concave) ‘haute concentrate’ bottle that goes for $10-$20 on ebay and comes in the non-descript box with the bottle cut-out and clear cover/wrap-around.
It’s absolutely horrible. Take any generic, green 70’s frag and put it in a hot window sill for a few weeks. That’s what you get here.
Perhaps the old Worth Pour Homme in the green bottle is okay, or the one in the spray bottle is okay… I can’t speak to those. I can, however, tell you, unequivocally, that the bottle I described is trash.
Bauka_kz – :
I have a large mirror covered cabinet that contains over 60 fragrances. I use perhaps about eight on something of a rotation depending on the circumstances. Recently I’ve dug out a few that hadn’t been worn in some time. I tried out Oscar for men recently which I found to be repellent, an absolutely vile spray of vinegar with pepper and pine. I then tried and throughly enjoyed the exuberant purple Sung Homme a very happy but loud fragrance. Most recently I pulled out a bottle of Worth purchased a number of years ago. I understand that this fragrance has been discontinued. How unfortunate for it is a marvelous fragrance. Worth made in England as the sticker on the bottom declares seems to be just that, a lovely but slightly subdued scent that is very proper and very English. The components formulated in the 1930’s are perfectly balanced. Lavender, oakmoss, a very mild coniferous aroma, a subdued but spicy carnation, a hint of leather and cedar and a slight citrus meld together in a most dignified but lovely manner. Worth is a bit subdued, the sillage isn’t powerful however the longevity is excellent. If you want to be a bit more fragrant you’ll require a few extra sprays but obviousness is not the anticipated effect of Worth. While I usually enjoy wearing fragrances that are somewhat more assertive Worth will become a welcome part of my rotation again.
jastes – :
Clean, soapy, gorgeous – simply one of the best men’s fragrances – true – it’s cheap now – but it smells better than some costing 4 times the price. Longevity and sillage are great though it is a “one note” fragrance with a beautiful long lasting drydown. It really is a classic cologne – so fresh
udo139InsuffBooni – :
When was this created, 1932 or 1980? If it was created in 1932 it was gloriously ahead of its time, if it is from 1980, it is a Paco Rabanne copy cat. It does smell good, but not as good as the original PR.
GonNeeneNuh – :
I have been buying many expensive fragrances lately, but for once I bought a cheapy,only because of the views posted on here. I tried it first time and thought, this is too powerful, I don’t like it, but after an hour it mellowed down, and after two hours it was smelling quite refined and sweet. It is a powerhouse, much like the colognes of the 80’s, and it brings back memories or my party nights. It was a very good purchase and recommended to the more mature man, I would like to try the older version everyone is raving about, but where to find it I don’t know.
wan2009 – :
I bought this as a gift to my father. I like it so much, that now I want to try Worths’ Fragrances for ladies. This is a very well blended combination of lavender and vetiver and truly an elegant and refined classic.
sarahwestmorelander – :
***This is a review for the Worth Pour Homme Haute Concentration version.***
Wow! A classic masculine leather fougere that starts with an explosive and intense beginning and then integrates into a clean, leathery and slightly soapy ending. A very masculine powerhouse that exudes power and elegance. I was searching for the Haute version for some time, but the prices have become so high that I decided to wait for a good deal. I went into my local perfume store about a week ago looking for Givenchy Vetyver. They didn’t have it so I sampled some other classics. I asked if they had Worth Pour Homme, amazingly he showed me three paisley boxes. I was shocked! I opened one of the old boxes and noticed that the liquid was thick and looked like apple cider. I tried it on and realized it was the after shave. The other two boxes were what I was looking for. I sampled the juices and was immediately transported to a magical land of fierce leather goodness balanced with cleanliness. All three bottles for $130. Worth Pour Homme and the Haute version are classics that are timeless and will always be in my collection.
i6imbai – :
I have a new bottle of this. While I think it´s still very good, I also have an older bottle, and it´s really much better.
Why can it never be the other way around, are there any colognes where the latest formulation is the best? I really like to know.
If you like to know how this could have smelled, find an old bottle of Brando by Parera, stunning.
Shtopr – :
Strength and soul in a bottle.
vanuch82 – :
As there is no Worth Haute Concentree post here, I guess this thread will do. Yes, I am referring to the paisley box Worth Haute Concentree.
The essence of 80’s powerhouse fragrance. I sprayed once on myself, went to a party that lasted more than 2 days, and the smell was as pungent as ever.
Goes with loud clothes and loud music. Enough said.
vladimirjag – :
You can not talk about Worth Pour Homme without mentioning the historic design house of Charles Frederick Worth. The quintessential house of high fashion was in existence from the 1850’s to 1956. Its founder Charles Frederick Worth was the father of Haute Couture. An Englishman in who took Paris by storm he invented the designer label, the runway model and so many other aspects of fashion we now take for granted. He dressed the great ladies and stars of his age and married one of his models. He was the creator of the hoop skirt, the bustle and was the first designer to use the early sewing machine. Mr. Worth was the first superstar designer in history. Patterns for his clothes were sold all over the world and most likely Mammy used just such a pattern to run up Scarlett’s green curtain dress in “Gone With The Wind.” Among his clients were the clothes mavens of the day such as Empress Eugenie of France, Empress Elizabeth of Austria, Queen Victoria, the Astor’s, Vanderbilts, and Carnegies of New York. After his death in 1895 the design house continued until it was closed in 1956. Today the house is simply called Worth Couture and has re-intorduced haute couture, lingerie and Prêt-a-Porte lines by designer Giovanni Bedin . The company got into the fragrance line in the 1920’s and has produced fragrances separate from the couture house since the 1930’s. Among these perfumes is only one for men, Worth Pour Homme.
The original formulation was created in 1932 by perfumer Odette Breil-Radius who decades later created Miss Worth. It was re-introduced in 1981 and still conjures up old world glamour and joie de vivre that can only spell P.A.R.I.S between the wars. This is a woody spicy animalic delight. It is all gentleman elegance personified in the most arresting way. It opens sharp and old school style with rosemary, nutmeg, cinnamon, a huge blast of lavender, a bit of mandarin, and a dash of petit grain and bergamot. It is sharp but not rude, old fashioned and refreshing like a cocktail at four in the afternoon at the Ritz bar in the company of a beautiful French actress all decked out in her Worth cocktail dress. It is a quick drink and then off to the middle notes.
Rich notes they are too, a wonderful blending of green notes, Brazilian rosewood, pine needles and geranium. Here very early on in the heart of the fragrance comes the leading base note of rich exotic leather, like the polished well worn leather of a Turkish soldier’s saddle reused in a smart leather club chair. This wonderful leather seeps into the rosewood and becomes quite “Clubby” putting one in mind of rainy late Fall afternoons in salons off the Avenue Montaigne. Kind of like an Englishman in a French salon, proper, upright but not uptight or adverse to a little naughty French fun.
Towards the early part of the dry down enter the vanilla splendors of the tonka bean, washed in musky ambers, Oakmoss, and vetiver inside a cedar box lined with balsam fir. This is where one can relax into the warm comfy elegance of a really sumptuous dry down to the end.
In all it lasts about six hours, a wide range silage. Once within a six foot range the recipient nose in your vicinity will notice this fashionable classic. Not many people know of this old boy who had been strolling the block since the 1930’s so maybe it is time to take note of this stylish gentleman, Worth Pour Homme.
FOUR GOLD STARS ****
ymu569Negeltzex – :
I am a vintage Paco Rabanne junkie. Worth Pour Homme Haute Concentree is the closest thing I’ve ever found to original Paco RPH. But Worth is pretty amazing in its own right. Also I have the original formulation of Worth PH from 1980. I have to say…I prefer the lighter Haute Concentree. The original is a little too dense. As to the version pictured here…I’ve never smelled it. Sounds like a completely different animal.
Ecowcreetterm – :
I have a new bottle of this. While I think it´s still very good, I also have an older bottle, and it´s really much better.
Why can it never be the other way around, are there any colognes where the latest formulation is the best? I really like to know.
viperrr14 – :
I tried this on the strength of the reviews below and am very glad I did. Was initially worried – found the opening a bit heavy and challenging but it settles leaving a smooth, complex, quite fresh and very natural smell. It is very masculine but becomes more smooth and refined.
After 2 hours or so it gets a little lighter, with a lovely leather note, a touch floral and very slightly soapy and this is when it smells GORGEOUS.
This is wonderful stuff. Not an “easy” scent – initially quite heavy, deep, complex and masculine, but very well balanced. Feels refined. A very clean, confident and quite fresh smelling, sophisticated, manly smell once it settles.
I’m 36 and could not have carried this off a few years ago but I absolutely love it now. My girlfriend generally dislikes “heavy” and “old school” male scents – she likes this a lot once it has settled.
Excellent longevity and projection, especially for the price. Projects well for 8-10+ hours, is still good on skin for 13+ hours and is still pretty good on skin with a tiny bit of projection well beyond that.
Great value. Truly fantastic scent. I’d happily pay far more than current prices for this one. Very highly recommended.
immoffImalp – :
Worth Pour Homme is an extremely classic fougere: no doubts. If you’re into “first-wave” type of masculines and if your idea of cleanness brings to mind of Kouros, then Worth Pour Homme is for you. A slightly severe opening with loads of herbs (and the usual lavender accord) introduces a leathery/musky composition of incredible beauty. A remarkable woody presence reinforces the general masculine vibe while subtle floral patterns provide incredible refinements. Civilized yet not too mannered, long lasting but not overpowering, fresh with just a tad of dirtyness providing and incredible balance. Terrific.
Rating: 8/10
arrergomienot – :
This is for the Haute Concentration formula in a blue & red paisley box. It is not related at all to the original or reformulation and is in no way similar to Paco Rabanne Pour Homme. I, personally, put Vintage Paco Rabanne Pour Homme on a pedestal – it is suave, fresh, sophisticated, green, warm and harmonious. It is the best scent ever created for a man and the essence of what an aromatic fougere will ever attempt to be.
Grottola and Lanier offer great reviews here – this is a strong, slap-in-the-face scent. Haute Concentration for sure! Wow! The sinuses were cleared by the initial blast…it only took one on my wrist to realize this could be used for huffing if one wanted an olfactory high. But, then the scent warmed up on my skin and after about 30 minutes of a medicinal lavender/sharp carnation-clove/pine needles nose-bleed – Worth HC hits a nice point of smoothness as the lavender softens (due in part to the citrus burning off and heart notes coming through), nice rich moss and rosemary (fresh-cut, not dried) cloud around you that softens up into a nice soapiness (a good thing – almost a lather of leathery moss with lavender and a blend of soft floral and green notes). This inviting fog has allure – we are now in the early 80’s and polyester has a place in our attire. Driving a Mercedes 450SL convertible and the late days of disco and early club music is what this smell evokes images of…along with, somehow, a sense of being in London in cool weather (there is a British pompousness to this that I like – I think chaps in London’s gentlemen clubs and pubs wore this…and the true gentlemen still do). I would not wear this in warm weather unless I wanted to offend somebody. The paisley box is obnoxiously retro-cool…I like it along with the bottle itself. This has a vibe to it.
This is serious and not for the faint-of-heart: 8+/10. It has a place on my shelf and one of admiration. I will come back for more slaps in the face by Worth Haute Concentration with a smile. Wear this with a ‘hipster attitude’, retro clothes with style and panache…or, it will wear you. Great stuff, but rich and definitely packs a punch.
**UPDATE** – this 2nd review is for the reformulated blue box bottle (Made in England), shown above, that is clear with blue block print – which is an entirely different scent from any other Worth bottling (Vintage and Haute Concentration). This is true classic, aromatic fougere captured in a bottle. Shamus1’s review (along with alfarom’s) and a few others led me to this blind-buy purchase. I am very happy I did! The top notes of lavender and herbs are sharp and pronounced – a blast hits your nose…and old-school vibe – this is what I look for and find! Great note integration as the pyramid fills in – note separation in a well-made aromatic fougere like this is excellent (and I took my time really examining this on my arm – 2 full sprays):
Top notes are rosemary, nutmeg, cinnamon, lavender, mandarin orange, petit grain and bergamot
Middle notes are carnation, green notes, brazilian rosewood, pine tree needles and geranium
Base notes are leather, tonka bean, amber, musk, oakmoss, balsam fir, vetiver and cedar
The notes are all there – wonderful composition. While one “element” is missing and cannot be listed and that is the classic slightly-soapy vibe that Worth Pour Homme offers (and I mean that in a good way). A gentlemen scent that transcends time…I don’t think I would want this to be a “louder”, more powerhouse fragrance. One the opening warms up, this actually wears very gentlemanly – a bit retrained, but a long-lasting skin scent that creates a nice aura. It is meant to be applied liberally, yes, but also the refinement and class this has means one should not try to overly-project it, in my opinion. It layers fantastic with the splash after shave lotion…adding more top notes and richness to the fougere/old-school vibe.
The base notes of great leather, balsam fir (which transcends from the pine needles in the heart) and musk are truly wonderful, albeit a touch soapy (fine, french-milled soapiness – that is). The green notes are there, but not as prevalent as Paco Rabanne Pour Homme – neither are some other base notes, but in place is the rich leather as pointed out by Shamu and others. The pine needles and fir in the heart and base of Worth Pour Homme are definitely reminscent to a rare, treasured composition in Vintage Revillon Pour Homme (1977) – excellent choice of notes for this composition that further separates the magic in the current formulation from Paco Rabanne PH. And, everything is turned down here…once it settles, it gives you comfort and a sense of place & purpose. This is a bottle of great fragrance unto itself, all comparisons aside.
I don’t believe this is outdated at all – it is classic Aromatic Fougere and a bit understated. Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, Azzaro Pour Homme, Worth, and a mention to Patrick (from Fragrances of Ireland) as well as other numerous Aromatic Fougeres do not go out of style…in my opinion, they exude class, sophistication, taste and knowledge of fragrance. To not have these (among other great fougeres) in my wardrobe would be simply unimaginable.
Excellent fragrance – 8.5+/10. I cannot say I like this more than the Haute Concentration (in the blue & red paisley box) by much, but I give it the nod because it is imminently far more wearable and chic. It is a more classically structured fougere with a great composition. What it lacks in macho, it more than makes up for in class & taste. A scent that can be worn by a gentleman or someone who simply enjoys classic fougeres…regardless of attire, but you will feel better wearing this with a button-down shirt or a polo.
BULATOV – :
I know it’s my second review of this fragrance but, this is fabulous stuff. I like this better than Azzaro Homme – now that really IS a complement!
Deroxmkqnw – :
I have only tried the vintage Worth Pour Homme Haute Concentration version. The top notes are very strong and cause olfactory fatigue, so keep that in mind. Unlike some others, I don’t find it especially dry and I don’t get any patchouli. I think the note pyramid above is accurate. The oakmoss and lavender seem especially strong, and the leather note is clear. The spice is blended in with the amber and tonka. The herbal/green quality seems to come and go, and the wood is very mild. This is like a more complex, non-animalic version of Paco Rabanne, and it’s somewhat similar to Azzaro Pour Homme, though this one has no anise. I think I like this one best, due to the excellent note contrast. In particular, there is a great interplay between the lavender and moss aspect and the spice and amber/tonka one. The ingredient quality is around niche level, so that’s another major thing in its favor. Projection (“sillage”) seems just right once the top notes subside and the longevity is at least very good. Right now, it’s selling very inexpensively, so anyone who thinks he’s an aficionado should consider adding a 50 ml bottle to his collection (unless you really hate oakmoss, lavender, or leather notes).
samvelox – :
just got this today and I am indeed pleseantly surprised
For an inexpensive fragrance it has all the marks of a good quality top brand . Its start of a bit sharp but than it mellows down to warm musky and woody notes. I had a couple of positive comments from co workers alread y telling me how good it smells on me .
Nice result.
dacent – :
This review is for Worth Pour Homme Haute Concentration.
One of the strongest, driest masculines I’ve smelled, Worth Pour Homme HC is an uber-macho roundhouse kick to the sinuses, in the form of an aromatic fougere. It’s strong, and it stings the nostrils. It’s not so much animalic as it is simply dry and heady. The classic lavender-coumarin-oakmoss structure is buried under a big, dry patchouli note with some leather thrown in the mix. I don’t really get any pine out of this. It’s mostly a dry patchouli-leather fougere, and it stays that way for a while. I would say after 4 hours or so the drydown really kicks in and Worth Pour Homme Haute Concentration eases up. The coumarin comes to the fore, and the leather becomes a bit more plush. I like this stage of Worth Pour Homme the most, as it really brings out the smooth aromatic fougere structure that I cherish so dearly. There’s nothing like a good aromatic fougere to ease your soul. I would say that, in total, Worth Pour Homme Haute Concentration lasts about 7 to 8 hours. No matter, it’s still a strong fragrance. I’m gonna need some time to get to know it, but there’s no doubt it’s one of those rare, worthy masculines. This is not for the timid – don’t blind buy it if you’re unsure. However, if you dig powerhouse fragrances, old “macho” scents, or aromatic fougeres in general, definitely check out Worth Pour Homme Haute Concentration. It’s about as high quality as you can get in a masculine.
avepaycle – :
Is this the lovelyest cologne for men? It might be, it´s so perfectly blended so it´s a real privilege to wear it.
Fragonard has one that is very close to this.
Metalking – :
I still have the original one till now and I am very proud of keep it till now, but the atomizer is not working since 2001. I just want to know whether the new version has the same fragrance or not?
dbuforg – :
Although I have never smelled the orignal formulation of Worth Pour Homme, I cannot imagine the current version being inferior to ANY fragrance, never mind any prior formulations. This is a truly outstanding fragrance in every way. It is one of my all-time favorite scents, and is perhaps the best fougere I have ever smelled.
Basically it’s a leather fragrance in fougere form. Think Paco Rabanne without the green notes, a bit more restrained, and more leather. Every note in Worth Pour Homme is perfectly balanced, making this one of the most comfortable fragrances I’ve ever worn.
Much ado has been made by some people about how the vintage version of this is just so much better than the current formulation. Why? Just because the old version was stronger? So what? Trust me, I love strong fragrances, but stronger doesn’t always mean better or richer. I’ve never smelled the vintage version of Worth PH, nor do I care if I ever smell it. I’ll be hanging out with my bottle of Worth, and while I’m at it, I’ll be buying back-ups.
Worth Pour Homme is as close to being the perfect masculine fragrance as it gets.
MY RATING: 10/10
09_mobi – :
I think I agree with RobbieX on this one, it´s really good, soapy and long lasting, beautiful quite complex drydown, what more does one need?
Paco Rabanne PH is a little similar, but sweeter.
This one is among the best that I know of.
I have the one that is like the picture.
HobAppole – :
I am tempted to say Worth pour Homme is a classic men’s fougere, but “classic” is a word which tends to be overused. In any case, it has only been around since 1980-81 and as such postdates many of the more well-known fougeres.
I would say rather, that it is an archetypal fougere. It starts with the familiar crisp clean combination of lavender and citrus notes evident in other fragrances, such as Paco Rabanne and Azzaro Pour Homme. It is often compared with the former and it is very similar, but in many ways offers much more.
The powerful, almost overpowering, soapy start of Paco Rabanne is toned-down in Worth and is augmented with, rich herbs and spices in its top notes. The real beauty of Worth is its relative subtlety and more diverse range of detectable notes (at least to my nose) as compared with other powerhouse fougeres from the same period. It is the balance of this fragrance that makes it an archetype. None of the notes overpower any other. The piney notes are complemented wonderfully by the florals and as the sharper elements subside it has moved away from its original resemblance to Paco Rabanne.
After a two to three hours the warm musk and woody notes remain and work with the oakmoss to ensure that Worth still has a substantial presence for a long, long time. This “ticks all the boxes” for a quality fragrance and best of all it can be bought for a fraction of the price of either Paco Rabanne or Azzaro pour Homme. This is definitely a top-ten fragrance for me.