To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
zvn646speagoessenda – :
There is nothing amber in this. This fragrance is a vintage a drugstore white floral that is pretty enough, like Le Jardin with aldehydes and oakmoss.
zinsky – :
As advertised, just what a big pile of chantilly would smell like. Lacey, cottony and fresh.
sergjd – :
watered down to meet the tastes of younger people who tend to go for sweeter and fruity perfumes with a modern edge, no the vintage version is the best, but each to their own.
vuo009JeomiWogkig – :
I bought this for a whole $6.00 from a sketchy “perfume warehouse” in a bad neighborhood . Nice and BETTER than the old fashioned original.
Happy for six bucks.
HazardGates – :
The Dana version is a water down version of the original by Houbigant. Not that it’s bad, but if feels more like an after shower splash, with lots of alcohol that evaporates in no time. It’s “nice” and non intrusive and it makes you feel fresh. However, it cannot be called a perfume, it’s not longer in that category, unlike Houbigant’s that can hold a candle to any of the high priced classics.
Another one bites the dust.
vnm763 – :
For a while I thought, wow, Dana White the UFC president released a version of a classic perfume! Then I learned this was not the case.
pan1n5 – :
Too old-fashioned fragrance to me. Not sweet, no “chantilly”, too much amber. Too strong. I’m disappointed.
Not for me.
Deadpoolishe – :
Smells very classy and at a very low price. I only wish it lasted longer than 3-ish hours.
Shadow-Cat – :
This is an old favorite for me! One that I need to replace. To me, this one smells fresh and sweet, kind of smells the way moscatto tastes. A light, slightly floral, fruity smell with a dash of champagne quality. The silage wasn’t particularly strong, but I remember it lasting well throughout the day.
fanterad – :
Smells like a sharp, tart version of the original Estee Lauder Beautiful, before it was unfortunately reformulated.
belivery – :
this is the spicier version of regular chantilly. a little stronger, defintely oriental, but not obnoxious. a nice, clean, day scent. a moderate lasting perfume.
NLZ – :
What! I didn’t know they had a white version. I had the pink one many years ago.
madved – :
i think this smells wonderful.soft,sweet,and quitely sexy.
Lickeya – :
It smells just like chantilly with some green crisp added to it. I almost forgot I had this stuff. I don’t ware it all really I just had to have just to experience it like most of the other women here.