To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
gamered – :
Lesson to every reader to think beyond negative reviews on this site. You never know until you try for yourself. This one is very well presented and isn’t at all dated. It’s a good flowery soap which lasts. Manly and deep. Like Prada for rugby players.
kant – :
Nothing for the modern man. This smells like an attempt to create a men’s version of white diamonds.
I get 4 hours of white florals,yellow florals,a tiny amount of spice, a sense of rose, and some notes that make it aromatic. soft projection
This is the worst men’s release I have ever smelled and I suggest you sample if you have any interest at all. It is the older brother of YSL Y and that is saying something.
I suggest you pass on this one.
0 out of 5
17reva17 – :
A classic fougere. Its in the same vein of YSL Rive Gauche and Azzaro Pour Homme. I love it!
pjj270InsuffBooni – :
I really love this one, perfect for hot climate.
This FIT perfectly any new manager leader or any person with important responsablities
It makes you feel superior/important and literally give you a lot of confidence!
-4 men are in a restaurant, dressed well, you pass by them and only by smelling this scent you would instinctively know who has the last word-
*****-Scent: 9/10
****–Projection: 4-5 inches
***—Scillage: 7/10
****-Exclusivity 10/10
A must have
sila – :
I agree with those who say that retro, classic perfume odor ….. gentleman to have more time!
I sprang from experiences such as Givenchy Xerius, Pasha de Cartier, or Marbert Classic …
Very nice scent Weil PH, which fits into the series!
Bold edition from 2004, since no such tones characterize the current scents
although highly valued that it is not allowed to dive into the old forgotten classic scents like Pour Homme from 86′ …. 🙂
PS: But I consider misleading to compare the smell of Kipling !!!
I used it a long time ago Kipling Perfumery (Edt, AS, Deodorant), but it was not like the smell!
I hope it will be available again in the Kipling !!!!
Merviholes – :
Weil pour Homme, a classic fougere that absolutely brings me back to being a little girl—this is what my dad and my uncles smelled like. It precedes Kipling by a few years (1980 v 1986) and they share some bones. To my nose WpH has a citrus opening, whereas, Kipling swaps out the citrus for tobacco, making it a bit more daring. They are both retro in the best sense.
Skorf09 – :
I believe this is a remake of the original “KIPLING” by Raymond WEIL that I have used around 1988 as a youngster (teenager) who wanted to smell like an old man, lol.
I need to try this one to find out whether I am right or I am right, lol.
Another classic I loved back in the late 80ies was “Samarkande” by Yves Rocher….
noobzz – :
Well, I admit my initial reaction to this fougere was rejection. I thought it smelled foul, dated and crappy. But on other days and when I was in different mood, is smelled nice and enjoyable to me.
Truth be told, it smells absolutely atypical for a 2004 launch. It has no tutti-frutti, no marine, no modern synthetic notes. Just plain ol’ redolence of lavender, herbs, amber and aged mosses.
Albeit it is very French, classic and proper, and even a little bit sour and stale for a while (in an aftershave-y, mature man sort of way), it is exactly that unashamedly conservative approach that adds a nice distinctive edge to this masculine scent. It without doubt smells like a man should smell. Aloof and severe, yet welcoming. It’s a fragrance to pick on days when you don’t want to make a statement, just feel clean and well-groomed.
——————-
Update: I found out that Weil Pour Homme was actually only re-launched in 2004. Originally it was available since 1980, so this is a classic indeed… 🙂