To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
giggs – :
I can sort of understand the negative reviews. After I bought it, I was wondering why I had bought it. To me it smells a bit like 212 Men, a bit like Versace Jeans Couture, a bit like Rykeil Homme Grey (all of which I own) – but not as distinctive as any of them.
Anyhow, 14 years later and the bottle content is getting lower and lower. I think it a very pleasant scent, and started wearing it often when going shopping.
Unlike other reviewers, I get good seven or eight hour endurance out of the scent.
Regards,
Renato
Гречка – :
I like that from time to time buy and perfumes, so to speak ‘unknown.Simply, do not cost much, and can sometimes really nice surprise!The same is the case with Roberto Verino,even a man full of his own perfumes, which in today’s world of conglomerates, the real surprise!The fragrance is very similar to Carolina Herrera 212 Men,provided however, that this was more pronounced a so called earl gray tea line,that is highly expressed in symbiosis with musk and vetiver,which together provide a nice wood base, and that largely neutralizes citrus that is almost so seamless,while somewhere in the background felt and floral ingredients very subtle and almost imperceptible,while cedar just completed the greenery that is present in each and every pore of perfume.Again I must reiterate that I do not like this perfume,green, citrus, woody earthy,but the perfume is quite decent, and for lovers of ‘green perfume very nice choice,of course, there are better, but for the price how much Roberto Verino is,can hardly be wrong!
redslawa – :
bought that in Autumn 2000, guess the girl in the parfum shop influenced me a lot, because I never liked that one, short lasting smell especially in a dry skin like mine
alex_xp – :
I bought it…. and I use it to get rid of it… Not bad, but no statement at all…. Boring, plain, aftershave-ish…
Atom – :
L’Eau Par Kenzo with tea. Has The same sharpness that ruined Kenzo for me. Boring, everyday tea fragrance.
Xeroxbpnql – :
Well, this is a tea oriented fragrance for sure. I can’t really smell much more than that, if I try, I can maybe smell some sandalwood. It’s an okay fragrance, nothing very exciting.