To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Evgenkun – :
Notes according to The Party Fragrances: Top: Bergamot, Cinnamon, Heart: Jasmine, Osmanthus. Base: Tolu Balsam, musk, oakmoss, heliotrope, patchouli.
As you can see there’s no Frangipani in this fragrance, it’s simply a white floral in which Osmanthus and Tolu Balsam makes most of the fragrance. It’s more harsh than honeyed and kind of oldfashioned except for the lack of aldehydes (thankfully).
Not a favourite of mine but not bad either, but not priceworthy as they all are kind of overpriced.
From this brand the Party in Manhattan is the only one I think is worth the doe.
sergs1979 – :
I was looking forward to testing this one, because I like frangipani, however, I am really disapointed.
On first application I was thinking that the sample must be off – there is a note that lingers there for a while that’s hard to describe, but it’s really quite repulsive. The only positive here is that (the note) it’s pretty weak! I can’t stand stupid statements of the kind that something smells like an “old lady”, however, in this case I quite understand where people are coming from (some negative reviews on LuckyScent.com and elsewhere). The official description there says:…” Frangipane harkens back to a time before today’s crazy bustle of traffic and cell phones…” which in this case I would have to interpret as rummaging in old stuff in the attics and coming across a 40 years old bottle of perfume that could have been fantastic back then, but today…although it doesn’t seem to be completelly rotten yet and although it does have a hint of luxury and flowers in it, it does breathe out those 40 years of exposure to moth balls, mouse droppings, dust and mold and discoloured powder. Or else – this note reminds me of that stench that comes out of a blocked drainage – after unblocking it! Faint smell of sewage. Sorry. Fortunately it’s quite faint indeed and thus this fragrance could actually be worn without anyone noticing it. But really – to me it’s not a frangrance I would like to smell on me. As for the price – it’s ridiculous!