To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
rxvformaf14 – :
It reminded me a bit of Chloe so I bought this as it only cost under $15.
But I soon regret this decision as this smells cheap. Too fruity and too young, unlike the delicate scent of Chloe.
Seldom use and left on the shelf for over a year time. :'(
sheldmmi – :
It DOES smell like Chloe because of the strong mixture of rose and magnolia, BUT it also has a decidedly fruity note, which in my humble opinion works quite well and takes the severity out of the rose-magnolia notes. It’s the younger, quirky sister of Chloe, which is fine, really.
I like that it doesn’t stay so long (2 hours tops on me), as I find the main notes to be strong and amazing, but if I were to smell this for six hours, I’m sure it’d be overkill – for me at least.
The minimalist bottle doesn’t fit this at all, neither does the colour. Why is it such a neony apricot colour? Why? And the name: Silk? It’s so contrasting it’s almost a caricature. Chloé’s chunky but classical flacon is so much better suited for this type of perfume. This is not luxurious smooth cold/warm silk, this is something else, entirely; more like a style or a look-on-life than a fabric.
I’ll enjoy this in Spring, to me it’s a very lively scent, a bit heady, but fine in joyous weather. I’m looking forward to it.
kokadjamba – :
Personally i dont think it smells like chloe, quite fruity once settled.. Very weak, lasted on my skin for half hour or so
mabyc – :
Opens with a blast of rose that quickly disappears and leaves dry citrus, musk and something woodsy.
Very low sillage and pretty weak longevity.
It was a gift, I’m not sure I would go and buy this.
However, it is very refreshing and uplifting. It is the perfect travel companion as it will not bother those around you. The yuzu citrus note makes it slightly unique and differentiates it from a simple eau de cologne.
vovati777 – :
I have the old Silk that Zara had a couple of years ago and the bottle is so much cuter than this simplistic and clean one. I need to say that it smells way much better than this one, does not remind me of Chloe too much it is much softer and smells rosy-flowery-sweet-fresh-musky to me. The sillage is good and the longevity pretty good – I can still smell it on me after 5-6 hours – could be my skin chemistry tak works well with that. I do not know why it was never caught anyone’s attention before but this is a good perfume and I like it. Perhaps have good memories linked to it and is always a pleasure to live the moments again.
Trormakicmisa – :
I must say I’ve unchecked this one from my wishlist. It really reminds of Chloe’s Chloe edp, but staying power is soo poor, that buying it would be such lost of money. After 30 minutes of applying it to my skin, I cant’t detect it any more.
kolanino – :
I agree, that this fragrance is more woody-floral. For me its a not bad copy of Chloe edp. The staying power is absolutely disappointing, but for this price 🙂
NSanja – :
For me its more woody-floral than citrus-floral. It reminds me of some other fragrances but i cant remember which one. It may be not very uniqe, like this one either, but I like it and would definitely wear it to the office, so its for everyday use. Im sorry that it only comes in a big bottle (at least in Hungary), but still thinking of buying one, and will give it away if I get bored of it.