To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Jenyska – :
Thank you, Drugstore Classics for your review that convinced me that I was testing the right fragrance.
The opening is spicy pink pepper and jasmine with a darker undercurrent. Something between a dark and dirty musk and iron. There are some other perfumey notes that remind me of black opium or juicy couture but nothing notable.
As it settles I get the apricot note strongly. I also do get the cherry whiskey someone described especially when I have my had about six inches away from my nose. The rose shows up when I press it to my face.
vcggysjbdtq – :
I thought I was going to like this when I smelt it on the test strip as the perfume had a nice rose opening. As it dried down the fruit notes came through very synthetic and I thought it could be the paper strip that made it smell that way. So I sprayed it on my arm and waited about ten minutes before I smelt it. Unfortunately it smelled like an “old lady’s perfume” as my husband described it. A little musky but has that cheap perfume smell and I was majorly disappointed. I expected more, especially from a brand like Michael Kors and I own a couple of his perfumes so this was a let down.
bas28 – :
This fragrance tanked hard, it’s easy to see why. The fragrance is very synthetic almost borderline medicinal. When I show sexy ruby the general reaction is mostly negative and people have not taken a liking to it. It’s nothing special or complex and honestly you can get better quality from a celebrity fragrance in my opinion.
Agreegepraw – :
Love,Love,Love!!! It is a lovely soft fragrance for fall…hits all the right notes and the dry down is heavenly.
I agree on one very valid point…it’s longevity is not good at all. That being said, I like to think I can discern good notes assembled in perfumes…the way I LIKE to smell! This fruity-floral with the cashmere wood base is so divine! I have all the Modern Muse’s and yes, it is similar to Modern Muse Rouge and the Gloss version…and yet I find myself reaching for this more often. If you are listening, Michael Kors Corporation, or reading these reviews, PLEASE salvage a worthwhile fragrance by upping it’s essential oils…don’t change the notes, just make it last longer. The fragrance is truly a dream, a soft fall fragrance that I love smelling on myself. For fragrances that don’t have longevity, I spritz on my underwear, bend over and spritz my scalp, and on this one…yes, I was desperate…I even rolled the rollerball on my eyebrows…it seems to need something to cling to and hair works well. I wear perfume to please others, hopefully, but mostly for myself and the lovely memories it creates. Please don’t miss out on a fabulous fragrance ladies..Woman by Ralph Lauren has the same issues. Perhaps an “intense” version will do the trick!
adenuathe – :
It was a bling buy for me, and sadly I really don’t like it.Someone mentioned its like the smell of cheap jewellery turning your skin green and this is mostly what I get. I can smell the fruit slightly, but mostly it is bitter on my skin. Now I am stuck with a 50ml gift pack with body lotion and shower gel not knowing what to do with it. It was my first ever MK perfume and I don’t think I will be brave to try another.
spice) – :
Surprisingly I like this…a lot. It’s a little boozy, syrupy compote fruity with a dry down that is warm. This is a red dress at a cocktail party kinda scent. My husband likes it on me.
I bought it as a gift set that came with a lotion. Just so you all know, the “silky” lotion does not match the scent of the fragrance…at all. The lotion is a tart floral and they do not compliment each other. I looked up the scent profile for the silky body lotion and all I got from Macy’s, Nordstrom, etc. website is…”It is subtly scented with creamy skin-like warmth and a heart of petals” WTH does that mean????
Goneeurothe – :
apricot, rose, musk and cashmere; the combo creates a very tart almost rhubarb type note; doesn’t last or project but is lovely and unique
xopmovqujg – :
The apricot is prominent, so is the rose.. Its a very nice, feminine scent on initial spray. In fact it is really nice and I liked it Now the downside.. The longevity is poor, on me it lasted only one hour and I was indoors, with the airconditioning running.
A fairly office friendly scent though, but you just need to spray more on to get it going. I guess I’m better off wearing Michael Kors bags instead!
Vitshev – :
Sexy Ruby is lovely! It has a sort of holiday vibe to it. Fruity in the beginning with a bit of spice from the cashmere wood. Then the florals show through with the jasmine sambac keeping it sweet and the rose giving it that powdery/soapy touch. It happens to be one of the only Michael Kors perfumes that I can say I love. Lasting power and sillage are both moderate for me.
Mabelod – :
I am a bit torn with my feelings of this one. I overall like it and bought it on sale recently. I like parts of the fragrance, the parts described by the notes – that real apricot, berry mix but the way it settles is different and I am not sure how to describe it exactly. It may be the apricot actually, it changes in an odd way. It does remind me of Rouge by Estee Lauder, that is a good comparison. I would say this is more boozy than that one.
_igROCK_ – :
As others have said, the name is a bit off putting. I felt the same way about Sexy Amber but as it turns out, I really like that one. The opening of Sexy Ruby is a very syrupy raspberry that I don’t care for. I definitely pick up rose but not much jasmine. The musky, woody cashmere dry down is the best part. I like it ok, but would probably never buy it.
777bigmen – :
Sexy ruby
I don’t agree with the accords listed. I get totally different vibe from this.
Perfumey powdery.
I’ll find my note and update
nictofik – :
Nothing to complain about this fragrance, just you feel like you’ve smelled this scent for Trillion times before!
pxk710Negeltzex – :
I agree that the name is stupid, and it and it smells like cool aid mix before you put the sugar in. Its very perfumy but not terrible. Reminds me of his glam jasmine and vera wangs rock princess. Ive yet to find an mk perfume i like. Pretty bottle tho
sergei111 – :
A very wearable & likeable scent by Kors, a playful mixture of sweet raspberry and lush floral’s with fresh citrus, wood undertones. The base comes across somewhat like a rich cashmere hug which i find warm, yet uplifting. Lasts a good while on my skin, overall a very seductive & addictive little number.
барабас – :
I’m surprised at all the hate and complaints about longevity on this one. I admit that it is nothing groundbreaking and I wouldn’t pay full price (I was gifted this by a friend who works in cosmetics and gets perfumes very highly discounted…like $5 for this $100+ bottle). However, this lasts all day on me and becomes a musky sweet scent. I do see the comparisons to Victoria’s Secret scents. Really reminds me of an upgraded, more refined Victoria’s Secret Vixen even though they don’t share familiar notes. Definitely fruity, but a rich fruity. Like a boozy fruit cocktail that costs too much but it’s enjoyed anyway. One of my favorites right now. I get a nice, dusty rose and a sort of library vibe to this in the dry-down. I haven’t tried many Michael Kors scents, but I am very impressed by Sexy Amber in terms of depth of amber scent and longevity. I apply the same to this, but instead of amber, it’s a fruit cocktail. Warm and comforting, but juicy. I now associate this with my best friend who thought of me, so it has a special place in my heart despite that it’s not terribly original or groundbreaking. I find that this could easily be a scent I throw on when I don’t know what to wear.
lamanov1 – :
Pretty bottle but it´s a really cheap, boozy smelling perfume and I´m sorry I did a blindbuy on this.
rey0027 – :
Okay, so I’ve been trying to tone down the meanness when it comes to reviewing here on this site, but “Sexy Ruby”? Seriously? What a cheesy name! I’d actually like to have a conversation with the marketing director who approved it. Like- how did this happen? Were you tired that day?
And the scent is weird. I get synthetically sour raspberries and grapes. It’s like Red Kool-Aid before you put the sugar in.
I mean look, it’s not the worst thing you’re ever gonna smell. And I suppose it may work with certain body chemistries. But please, please, please don’t blind buy.
Helldog – :
I’m sorry if this sounds bad, but the name Sexy Ruby is enough to put me off a bit. The Michael Kors brand has kind of a tacky image in my mind anyway, though, so perhaps I’m projecting it onto this perfume without giving it a fair shot.
barrboss81 – :
Sexy Ruby is just a like for me. It’s not bad but it’s not that good either, a bit forgettable. I think the quality of ingredients are maybe what makes this smell cheaper than it is. It reminds me of a BBW scent. Fruity rose and nothing sparkling about it. If you like a nice dusty rose and fruit smell give this a try. The silage and longevity aren’t very good though. I’m more of a sexy amber person, I guess 🙂
GoaceBedOdore – :
With a winey, thin, sour and grapey opening, Sexy Ruby can be a little nauseating. Sure, the whole fruit mix is balanced enough so as to smell raspberry too; in fact I think raspberry is more prominent than apricot in here.There is a strong current of general red fruit that give a sangria-like scent.
Weird scent. Follows the modern trends. It is being categorized as a Chypre Fruity, but in my opinion there’s little to no chypre here. It has a woody base; fine, but that’s not exclusive to chypres. It is aromatic, it has the pencil shavings scent somewhere too, dry without really smelling powdery.
A feminine, modern, party fragrance, very suitable for autumn weather. The perfume projects just fine, I sprayed it on my wrists and on neck it was surrounded in a fruity cloud from 18:30 until 22:00 when the overall scent started getting vague. So longevity is not terrible either.
But I don’t need it
hvbkBVHFKH – :
Despite many neg reviews about this fragrance, I like it because it works on me! It makes me think of a “Shirley Temple” sweetness but “darker & deeper” (could be the pomegranate)…It lasts long enough for me to catch a whiff here and there for good 4 hours. It blended in with my body temp and chemistry together as “skin scent”. Surprisingly, this is one of a very few perfumes that my hubby likes on me (he is one of the most simple person, NO cologne, NO after shave whatsoever). He LOVES sniffling this scent on me as it is fairly light and non-offensive to his sensitivity. To me, it is a pretty safe fragrance to wear on any occasion and anywhere.
…So there you go…I don’t dislike it and my husband loves it. On top of that, I got great deals buying it online. It may not get many positive votes, but you can never confirm that until you try for yourself.
dandan88 – :
Go figure! The only perfume my husband likes! I smell barely detectable rose. I bought the mini bottle and swore they filled it with mostly water, but reading the comments here I’m pretty sure it’s just a weak perfume. But, hey…If hubby likes it, I like it!
шериф2010 – :
As soon as I smelled Sexy Ruby it reminded me of Versace Red Jeans. This perfume didn’t have any air to it and after a few hours i couldnt really make out much except for some stale rose. Pretty bottle but not my type of perfume.
levinavika – :
Where did it go? Disappears almost immediately. Pretty bottle, tho.
TheniKefknoke – :
I love this perfume, its beautiful, but it has absolutely no lasting power or strength to it. Silage is low. This makes it worth so much less than it is priced because its weak as toilette would be. A real shame.
DioS555 – :
It’s a dusty, smokey rose, this gives it a slight vintage vibe. The top notes are definitely apricot or peach but not too juicy or realistic. Jasmine softens it as a base note.
oncinemaoncy – :
This could have been a decent perfume if its longevity would have been more than 15 minutes.
besshen – :
I like it better on the sampler than on my skin. When I spray it on paper it’s fruity and sweet in a very fresh way. I can picture a teenager with good taste. This effect is so different when I put it on my wrist! I can smell a smoky booze bar covered in raspberry jam and strippers when I do. The sparkly notes are completely gone. It won’t last long either. Too bad!
язук – :
MK Sexy Ruby has that boozy note that’s been trending. It’s VERY strong. This is probably not strictly the fault of the perfumer but to me this scent is reminiscent of that gods awful always regrettable ‘morning after’
gena66 – :
If it would actually have some kind of longevity, this perfume would be worth buying. The scent is a nice sweet “red” scent, but because it fades in no time—it really isn’t worth purchasing (especially considering it isn’t a cheap perfume).
Alex .. – :
Very surprised by the negative reviews, I thought this was really nice, tried about 30 women’s fragrances today and this was the one I ended up buying (not for me)
foma1981 – :
The apricot ruins it I think. What a shame, I was expecting something special and good. Disappointed.
XAMKA – :
I wanted to like this! I have been on the hunt for a good autumn/date night perfume, and when I saw this on the self at a Sephora, I had to try it immediately. I had some high hopes since I like multiple perfumes by Michael Kors.
Unfortunately the bottle is far more gorgeous than the scent itself, which to me smelled like medicine. No thanks.
Suedderfobe – :
So far this perfume gets a lot of dislikes comparing to likes. To me it smells just generic nothing special. So I’ll pass.
Hedgehog_ – :
Very similar to Estee Lauder Le Rouge, nothing new here. The notes are totally ok and you would expect something nice but this fragrance is somehow messed up.
Fire Face – :
This smelled really nice on the strip, so I spritzed a lil on my skin.. & O_O.. no likey.. it’s weird at times its nice then other’s its just like ew god what is going on here.. The nicer times it has a fruity sweet slightly powdery smell to it.. now it smells like old bubble gum with a penny..or like when you have cheaper jewelry on and can smell the metal.. like something in there is not playing nice with the other notes, I love most M.Kors scents and I love the red ruby bottle, but the scent sorry to say wasn’t a total love for me.
DiuddyMooky – :
As a few others have noted, this just smells..kind of foul, a little strange. Like there is a note that is not playing nicely with the others. Which kind of does not make sense to me, because in looking at the notes, I never really have an issue with any of the notes listed. Perhaps it is just the way this is blended. Something about this just smells a little off, like it is not even a perfume.
I tend to like a lot of Michael Kors fragrances, but this one is a pass for me. Glad I was able to test this one in the store before blind-buying this (which I almost did). Almost has a dusty smell to this at times. I don’t get it. Just a very odd smelling one for me. The bottle is pretty, which is a nice change of pace for MK to actually put a little thought into the bottle this time, but unfortunately the fragrance is what matters to me. Michael should go back to more basic & “boring” bottles, and pretty scents.
baly84 – :
Neither of these things are listed in the notes, but this straight up smells like a Manhattan or an Old Fashioned – just whiskey and cherries. Very bizarre. It smells like you could get drunk by wearing this.
g.praporov – :
This smells like anything but sexy, this straight up like smells like caugh syrup and I do not like that term to describe a scent but that is what I smell ! I loved the midnight shimmer by him and his signature but this is just a big no no in my book, not for me. Bottle is stunning
sirop2007 – :
I had high hopes for this one but on me this is pure spicy weeds from beginning to end. I will pass on this.
vasya46ru – :
Just smelled a scent strip sample out of an Ulta sale catalog and yuk! I agree with those who say this smells old, stuffy, stale and just not good. Smells like it has vetiver in it by the scent strip (I smell the same weird dill pickle vibe as I do in Marc Jacobs original Decadence). Nothing like what I anticipated. I’ll give another assessment if I find a bottle to actually test the juice, but from that scent strip it’s a definite no go for me.
On the other hand, the Sexy Amber sample right above it smells quite nice, but reminds me of Victoria’s Secret Amber Romance too much. Maybe on skin they’re different, but sniffing from the scent strip they smell like close siblings.
vas710xt – :
I received a sample of this from the store. It is a very lovely, soft, sophisticated fragrance. Very thankful it is not such a heavy white floral fragrance like some of their other perfumes. In my opinion it does border on the side of matronly but I really enjoy those tyes of perfumes. I would definitely love to see this available as a lotion to layer under other fragrances.
fasssd32 – :
This is so unusual that I may wind up with a roll-on, if not a bottle. Ruby is my favorite gemstone, and I love this bottle. Sexy Ruby smells like wine. Semi-sweet, rich and oak-y Cabernet. This does for pomegranate what Sexy Amber (I love Sexy Amber) does for amber…it magnifies it, embellishes it, and practically makes it dangerous. When I sniffed Sexy Ruby in Ulta, two ladies were testing the “Gio” line, right next to me. They were joking with each other about finding a scent that smelled of stale beer so they would drive their men wild. I turned to them and, jokingly, said, “Here’s a boozy one!” They both bought a bottle of Sexy Ruby, on the spot. You’re welcome, Michael Kors.
JennaUshkowitz – :
So I liked the bottle but unfortunately the scent inside is not as pretty …. I wasn’t a big fan of Michael kors fragrances and now I cannot stand them!
The fragrances opens with an over powering oldness of bitter sweet but then closing with nothing.
This fragrance is something I could buy in Superdrug’s dirt cheap and it would probably last longer.
Nothing compares to the Michael kors signature …. this is the best and the only one that really does appeal to me… the rest just seem like cheap stuff ….. but unfortunately the prices are not cheap … well over priced and definitely not worth it
shaman2005 – :
I’m so disappointed! I smelled the fragrance on a Vanity Fair sample strip, and thought it was just beautiful and exactly what I wanted. I went to Macy’s, sampled it, liked it and bought it. I brought it home and put it on. Mmmmm not much there. This smells like a cheap perfume you can buy in CVS for a few dollars. It’s going back!
Сантос – :
I tried it and wasn’t sure I would review it, as really I thought this wasn’t anything special…the pomegranate dominates, and in a weird smelling way…it gets sweet fast, and becomes very forgettable..
As far as it being a lighter version of Muse le Rouge, goodness no..the Estée
Lauder is much classier..I agree it could be a Bath and Body works scent…some fruity thing…not hugely unpleasant, but nothing extraordinary for the price!! Wouldn’t buy it, wouldn’t wear it!!
RuBear – :
It smells quite bad in my opinion. I don’t get the notes listed here. Except the rose, maybe, but it’s not the good rose.
Smells like something old, but it doesn’t have old-fashioned sillage. Luckily.
An eye-catching bottle but the scent is disappointing.
vincester – :
This is interesting. It does smell like rubies, but in gummy form. I mostly get pomegranate (which is weirdly not a note), indistinguishable white florals, and something a bit cloying and syrupy. Knowing the Fragrantica community, this is not going to be a huge hit, it will be waved off as “common”. For me though, it’s not bad, I think it’s good for someone in their later teens. As mentioned in an earlier review, it’s a sexy fruity perfume. I wouldn’t be surprised if Victoria’s Secret had an identical scent. I wouldn’t buy it though because sweet pomegranate scents always veer into headache territory for me.
kazancew1984 – :
I, like others, was not expecting to like Sexy Ruby, as I (sadly) have previously not been a fan of Michael Kors fragrances. However, this little gem 🙂 surprised me. Very rich, fruity fragrance which lives up to its name. It’s absolutely sweet and sexy. The predominant apricot note is lovely. Eager to add this to my collection.
Ram97 – :
You’re at a bar or a house party and someone knocks into you spilling your glass of rosé/champagne all down you. This fragrance perfectly captures this moment with the opening! The dry down is just as bad.
Not one for the office/work or while driving as people will think you’re an alcoholic.
tolik59 – :
Sexy Ruby is a fruity amber mix, centering around raspberry and rose. There’s not a lot to add; this is just a lighter version of Estee Lauder Modern Muse Le Rouge, with a helping of Victoria’s Secret Very Sexy [the newest version] thrown in.
This is not a bad fragrance, but there’s nothing original here and the sillage/longevity is neither poor or great [it averages at six/seven hours and goes close to the skin quickly], so it doesn’t stand out to me and leave a lasting impression.
If you love Modern Muse Le Rouge or Very Sexy but struggle to wear them as they are intense, then this softer version might work for you.
Artresan – :
Well… not what I expected on several levels.
The tester bottle nozzle (and indeed, dry down on the test strip) of Sexy Ruby smells remarkably like a less rounded version of Sexy Amber. It is warm, pretty, and womanly. Perhaps the cashmeran? But the top notes are fruity and of course, on me, rather sour. This is just a chemistry issue, but it smelled rather like pink grapefruit, or perhaps red currant and pink pepper. I would NEVER have guessed that tangy sweet opening was courtesy of apricot/raspberry, but now that I see the notes it makes vague sense.
As for the impact of this release itself:
Those who love the color RED will undoubtedly buy Sexy Ruby, if only for the jolt of electric enthusiasm such vivid color brings. I can also see some men buying it for their wives/girfriends for Christmas, associating their completely hot woman with the packaging!
Some Sexy Amber fans may well enjoy a different take on that classic and yet modern release. While the Amber is richer, this is by no means a poorly blended perfume, and seems more appealing to me than the average department store release.
But for my money a bottle of Sexy Amber smells a LOT more expensive, rich, and seductive!
ilody – :
I came across this in a department store yesterday, had a sniff, wasn’t repulsed (as happens with some designer perfumes!!) and decided to test it on my wrist.
At first it was quite blandly fruity, much like a body spray kind of smell. I could detect the raspberry and I could have sworn there was some patchouli in there, which gave it a bit more depth (but usually I DETEST stinky patchpoopy!) but I don’t see that listed in the notes on here. I found the cheap body spray vibe a bit annoying but after a couple of hours or so the perfume smelled a lot nicer and more like an actual perfume! In fact, it began to grow on me, and I was getting pleasant little whiffs of it as I moved around.
It has now lasted for 24 hours on my wrist and I can still easily smell it, which surprises me as I thought it would fade quite quickly as a lot of over-priced designer perfumes do in recent times (i.e. Dior’s Blooming Bouquet, which I love but it evaporates in the blink of an eye!), but so has my blend of 2 Al-Rehab perfume oils on my other wrist, which create a similar fruity aroma but with a lovely soapy / rosy twist for a tiny fraction of what Sexy Ruby costs!
Is this a sexy perfume? Not really. Sexy Amber is much sexier! Is it ground-breaking? No. Is it likeable? Yes. Worth the price tag? Not in my opinion but there are numerous far less likeable, fairly expensive designer perfumes out there than this one!
BlackWolf321 – :
Nice fruity scent and nothing more. After few hours I can barely smell it.
лапочка – :
Different to the usual drydown of Michael Kors scents which is of course the white floral.
Tested it 3 times on my skin. Convinced myself it was full bottle worthy even though it did seem soft and soft is not really my thing. I thought the occasional smell I got of cozy ness would work for me but I was wrong. No idea what it smells of really. Quite bland. Taking it back. The only perfume I have ever returned!
Lexluter731 – :
I’m not a fan of Michael Kors fragrances, but this is probably the most successful, least annoying perfumes from this brand.
The apricot was really interesting to me (I’ve never smelled a perfume with an apricot note!) and was the most prominent note. The raspberry-apricot/jasmine-rose dance was strongly present in the midphase, but it wasn’t cloying or annoying. (I’m generally not a fan of berries/fruits and roses.) About an hour later, I smell the apricot and cashmere with just a small touch of rose.
Sillage and longevity are just ok for this perfume.
This is just an okay fragrance, and I probably won’t be purchasing it, but it is one of the best MK fragrances thus far.
baglan111 – :
Unfortunately, this will be another one in the series of failed fragrances for this house. This is the exact opposite of what the original Michael Kors fragrance was all about. LVMH launched the original fragrance and positioned it as a luxury brand; however, Aramis Designer Brands took the golden goose and killed it dead… and drove over the dead body with a ton of flankers that are completely underwhelming.
I am sure that by October/November this would be featured in a One Day Sale promotion at Macy’s at a discounted price. At this time, it’s a race to the bottom. What a shame AND what a great missed opportunity for this house.
The Michael Kors brand had so much potential, and it has become so ordinary… someone needs to rescue this franchise before the other flankers: Sexy Emerald, Sexy Diamond, Sexy (Insert precious stone’s name here) hit the market!
And naming the fragrances like a Victoria’s Secret undergarment or a stripper is a new low… congratulations on lowering the bar to a new level.
П.А.В. – :
Really poor silage and longevity is close to nothing. Apricot notes are very, very prominent, and with a dry down it turns into one of those highly generic scents, one of many, with no character and slight ambition to be recognisable. Somehow I couldn’t really smell raspberry, although typically, it’s one of my favourite notes that I distinguish straight away.
strannikls – :
I purchased Sexy Ruby after smelling the scent strip in a magazine. It’s top notes are lovely but the fragrance faded very quickly and the fragrances longevity is poor. It is not my favorite Kors fragrance and I own quite a few of them. I would not consider this fragrance “sexy” by any means. It is a very average scent but nothing unique or is it a fragrance I would apply for evening dress. Kors has launched other more desirable fragrances for sure…..an example, in my opinion, is Sexy Rio de Janeiro! Now that one lives up to the name sexy!
sanek.krg – :
So I decided to buy this perfume. I get magazines in the mail for years now, and this perfume is in the September issues of Elle, Vogue, and Vanity Fair. I took some time on this. I personally think out of everything being released so far for fall releases this is one of the better perfumes. I have been selective on what perfumes I have been buying this year, and I really have to like it enough to buy it. There is a edge to this perfume, it’s light sparkling. I would say this is the best Michael Kors perfume since Wonderlust last year, I don’t like Sensual Essence it’s plastic like. I also think Sexy Ruby is the best perfume out of the Sexy line, the others aren’t as in depth as this one is. Great for fall. I would say more of a evening perfume.
stasboss – :
Ok so I have several perfumes. I was really really excited by all the hype around this perfume. The packaging and everything that evolved around promoting this perfume looked so promising. I sprayed it on when I go it and at first …it did not impress me at all. Nothing above and beyond. I had such high expectations I guess. The perfume itself is not bad. Longevitiy is fabulous. But it smells like your standard perfumee. I ended up just buying it for the name basically. Oh well. I was wondering why they did not have a tester bottle out on the counter???? Nothing too sexy about this perfume. I did take it back and got Gucci Bloom. Which is fabulous.
Vladislav777 – :
Sorry this time not my cup of tes! Sexy? Ummm no! just a normal summer fruity sccent,asked a guy at the store what his impression was and he just screamed to wash it off…
fql414speagoessenda – :
I haven’t had the opportunity yet to give this a full test but I have some initial impressions.
This is not a girlish jammy and cloyingly sweet concoction but a well balanced blend of the fruit with the ever so slightly green jasmine blended with the cashmere wood to round it out.
The apricot has a ripeness to it that isn’t mushy and overripe but slightly more under ripe and still firm. The raspberry adds a light blend to the fruit.
Jasmine is not heady and indolic but fragrant of the leaves and blossoms on a cool morning.
The cashmere wood is not overdone and artificial.
Is this a stand out fragrance? No. Safe blind buy and office wear territory, but a very nicely done modern, that doesn’t smell cheap.
kindrat82 – :
I smelled this on a tester strip at the Michael Kors store. It’s a sexy-fruity perfume, quite lovely.
STRELOK474 – :
I love everything with apricot – cant wait to try it!