To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
gluk54 – :
The champagne notes in this perfume are very apparent which makes it unique. However, the florals and amber are just sort of generic background scents. And while the champagne makes it stand out, it could also be the reason people might dislike it. Not everyone wants to smell boozy, and it doesn’t have that “sparkle” that you’d expect a fragrance inspired by champagne to have.
The saleswoman in the store was really pushing this designer, and I felt a little bad that all I had to say was “meh”. It didn’t wow me in any meaningful way, despite having a unique scent.
гав_гав – :
Today is my first time wearing Sexual Paris Tendre as I would any fragrance. Prior to today I have only tried it on my hand. I am a little taken aback by the classification, though. On my skin at least, there is nothing powdery, woody, or musky. This is a light, bright, fizzy veil. I do not get any orris root or violet, no musk and not really any amber. I suppose the stars of this on my skin would be the ginger, champagne, mandarin orange, freesia, and touch of sandalwood. It seems safe. I would be surprised if this was a headache inducer. I don’t think this would be offensive to others, so I would think office friendly. It is pretty. And I do like the ‘fizzy’ feel. I only wish there was a bit more of the flowers on my skin, the rose and violet. Definitely worth a try. Probably more for warmer seasons.