To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
nhentym – :
Bunch or roses anyone?
That is all I can smell, I don’t get the litchi at all but I am aware of something else in the back ground.
Lasts next to no time at all on me.
Quite disappointing really.
Save your money and go for something else.
It’s a NO NO from me.
techn0 – :
Oh dear, a cheap version of your average female Hugo Boss or Etienne Aigner perfume. It smells chemical and unsexy and I associate it at best with a cheap business look, but certainly with nothing romantic. You may argue that at least it’s cheap indeed, but then, wearing no fragrance at all is even cheaper.
*
Kriss – :
This is indeed rosy and slightly boudoir-ish. I have Cerruti 1881 too, which is undeniably rose, but this one’s more youthful, lighter, almost… sparkly.
I couldn’t decide between Innocente and this at first. My boyfriend picked this, I chose Innocente – only to get a headache from it and return it the next day in exchange for Romantica.
Oh and, somehing about this scent makes it very good for counteracting icky restaurant smells that your hair and clothes happen to pick up. A few spritzes of this and I feel all fresh and new again.
starantino – :
Piacevole, ma niente di speciale.
Nessuna nota spicca sulle altre.
Enable17 – :
Ok I get the Roses, but if I’m honest not much else. I know there is something else there but can’t for the life of me pin it down. Having said that I do really like this one, it’s mild and not too artificial unlike some rosy smelling ones. The only drawback is that it does not last very long, or that could just be me.
natali2618 – :
Rose, rose, rose. Rose above all other notes.
To me, not as interesting as the L’Occitane rose fragrances, but pleasing and not too artificial. I would not spend my money on it, but if I got it as a gift I would wear it.
IsabeLeanor – :
I think this fragrance smells like chloé eau de parfum.
The sillage is very very similar!
okn808speagoessenda – :
I agree its comlpetely Chloé! The same dominant powderness, a bit more sillage but with a weaker staying power. I didnt find it spicy, just a powdered lily of the valley fragrance. Nice, cheap, discounted version for Chloé fans.
sashkaza – :
Very weak perfume. Slightly reminds of Chloe but maybe more spicy.
DypeKexasse – :
Really fruity and a little bit artifical, pleasant fragrance. Nothing special, somehow between girly and grown up.