To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Pasha_ – :
I own this in a cube tester bottle and I’m here to take some of the mystery out of this fragrance. It’s nice, but it’s not $25,000 nice. The baccarat is gorgeous, don’t get me wrong, but it’s the spirit of highbrow exclusivity that this perfume is so exorbitantly priced because no bottle or juice in itself is worth more than a few hundred bucks realistically, nothing modern anyway. Simple economics of supply and demand are what’s at play here. Low supply+perceived value and demand=high price. And the value IS perceived here or just marketed, eh, pick one.
Here’s what it smells like: Metallica/ Metalys. The opening is very shrill and highly metallic, similar in feel to Nahema extrait, but it dries into a round creamy ylang, jasmin, and vanilla floral. It’s very clean with nothing dirty. I get no resins, no carnation. It’s actually a pretty simple fragrance that stays fairly linear after the highly metallic opening. While it IS gorgeous, I would never pay over a couple hundred dollars for it, even for a tester.
Edit: I’ve since finished my tester bottle and have purchased a fb of Metallica and they definitely are the same fragrance. Reve de Lune is clearly the extrait and wears as such but I actually prefer the edt. It’s brigher and more translucent vs a heavy, syrupy floral that Reve de Lune is.
zyxel55 – :
If $ was no object ,i would buy it just for the bottle to put on my mantle.scent unsniffed
Work of art
BurnGenined – :
I’m sure i saw this on display in the Champs Elysees boutique in Paris, absolutely stunning. Wish i could afford it! I bought Spiritueuse Double Vanille though, so i’m VERY happy!
K_M_C – :
@leefidan WOW! Never thought it is SO expensive!
Really wondering who voted it! The bottle is stunning. Although I don’t like aldehydes, I’d really like to try it!
TeedSlemy – :
Aloha! I just saw your comment “halalula” and wanted to share my web search with you. There were only 57 numbered bottles made and they cost $25,000 U.S. dollars each. I agree that the bottle looks amazing!
9unlim – :
Sorry i have to comment,
I dont own the scent and have never really found a place which has it, but the bottle is AMAZING.
I wouldn’t be surprised if this was only available in a Guerlain boutique in France for the price of a house…..