To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Karlisonchik – :
I have this but it’s too light for me. One hour later this gone. nevertheless, a nice scent, more like a mist that edt. I also find the original Paul Smith rose to be very light too.
relasteenn – :
I love this 2011 Summer Edition of PS Rose. I love the original rose. 2011 Summer Edition is one of my favorites! Sweet berries & apricot, with a hint of citrus with Rose. Sweet but fresh – I sometimes wear it together with PS Rose (original). 2011 is a much better PS summer edition than the 2012 – this one is too musky and powderly, more of an ‘old’ rose smell. I definitely prefer the 2011 edition.
semiami – :
Nice, wearable everyday scent. Only problem I have is that it goes away after 2 hours, then you’ll need to reapply.
pashko637 – :
Finally I was able to test it 🙂 I tested it yesterday and the scent is still there and very strong, just like the original. It is a nice scent that seems to be very close to the original. It might be slightly greener and has a slightly sweeter endnote. So I wouldn’t buy it, because I see not much difference to the original which I have.
lekpom – :
This doesn’t smell all that summer to me…and no offense but it kind of smells like victoria’s secret delicate petals…it is less boring than the original one but it is also not as fresh as the original one…
ToogUtits – :
Ugh. What is the point of this? One minute of vaguely rose-themed florals quickly devolves into a repulsive Ready-to-Drink fruit cocktail. This truly smells like a bad night out, aged 18.
Thankfully, it lasted only two hours from start to finish on my wrist, so I didn’t have to bear the mediocrity for long.
Again: what is the POINT of fragrances like this? Why wouldn’t you just try harder to make something – at the very least – pretty? Sure, it’s a seasonal flanker so not intended to be world-class – but why cheapen your name, Paul Smith house, with something so unpleasantly banal?