To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
kokiauau – :
I see some debate about the formula/year of this one. I ordered mine from fragrancenet.com, and they have it listed as 1990, the very same bottle as the current main picture here, and the one I ordered from fragrancenet says: “the original scent, soft mosses and aromatic woods”. Having said all of that, this to me is a vintage type powdery rose scent, a little soapy, as well. I like it. This reminds me of a Jeanne Arthes fragrance, the name escapes me right now. Some young ‘uns may think this is ‘old lady,’ as it is not a sugar bomb or a fruitcholi. But, after all, this was created in 1990, when powerbombs were still being created.
Having said that, this is by no means a powerbomb. Moderate sillage and moderate longevity. A bit of woodiness does come out in the dry down, but not enough for me to say this ‘smells woody’. There is also an interesting wet earthiness to this. I see someone mentions peach, and I, too, get a little peach on the dry-down. It’s kind of interesting! Kind of nice in a way that it is ‘a little different’. Not an everyday fragrance for me, but a nice change of pace now and then.
Aleks 1973 – :
I blind-bought this believing I was getting the 1990 one. This happens to be the 2003 version. It’s not terrible, but if I had smelled it I would not have bought it. ☹. The voters were right. The predominant notes are ylang-ylang, which I’ m not crazy about; musk, which I only tolerate in minimum doses; and green notes, which one me always smell like lettuce, or worse, wet vegetables.
Thank goodness for the rest of the notes or this would have gotten canned right away. I paid a very low price for a tester, so I’ll give it another chance. So far, I’m underwhelmed. This is a far cry from the gorgeous Montana powerhouses of the 80s. Rats.
Ihtiy11 – :
I like this scent surprisingly.
I have bought this fragrance by chance.
It was an occasion. Actually I thought it was the first parfum d’elle which I adore but never had.
At begin I have found it no so special. Even a bit synthetic.
But now I appreciate.
It is a musky iris with light unripe, sour fruits and tropical flowers like ylang or sweet aldehydes, sandal maybe. White woods. Smell like fig milk resin at times.
Very refined, sexy, without be invasive, almost innocent with class, not childish. Soapy. Wearable. It could be a sour version of Cashmere mist or Nocturne by Caron.
A forgotten little treasure. Very good. A bit distant, aristocratic.
Remember me also a bit Dovana by Sylvaine Delacourte could be one of those.
артём2000 – :
On its golden box is written:
“The exuberance of red fruit and peach release from an imaginary shell a strong fragrance with a generous heart of magnolia, iris, and geranium leaves, refined by purity of wood, the discretion of amber and the mystery of musk”
so notes here up seems to be totally arbitrary.
In fact as often fragrantica create new note list by their ispiration. somewere else we have:
Top: Aldehydes, Peach, Red berries
Heart: Geranium, Iris, Magnolia
Base: Amber, Musk, Tonka bean, Cedar.
It is a fruity acidule powdery scent.
Imagine of a fresh white velvet on your skin.
Linen and velvet fragrance.
To me smell like white melon and vanilla pear yoghurt, vinyl and make up. A sort of baby body lotion.
Iris geranium light talc.
I find it similar with Lou Lou Blue.
This is not an 80s fragrance as the comment below says. More second half of the 90s. Officially 2003.
.
papadosoff – :
Classic 80s scent. fresh and floral. On skin it becomes very soft. I had it in my young 20’s. Liked it then