To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
gushin_sv – :
I like this one… and love the original. This has a more woody and powdery smell. The original has a lot of memories and nostalgia.. this hasn´t. But still a good solid and wearable perfume that has a classy, timeless and feminine touch to it. Longevity is good so is silage.
nikolaeff – :
this is a must have!
lapygin – :
Softer, drier, more wearable and more powdery version of Tresor.
Its really delicate and light. Creamy and clean, without that ‘musky’ drydown. Very easy to wear. Close to the skin, but do gets noticed. Gives of “polished” vibe. Definitely does not belong to floral-fruity category. On my box it says that it’s floral semi-oriental. One of my favorites – I love it!
wvj469speagoessenda – :
This has been my signature scent for several years. I keep hearing that it is “older” but to me it smells sweet, timeless and complex, but subtle. Sillage is modest, which I like. I just opened a new bottle and today I can detect a hint of pencil shavings (LOL) in the opening which I never noticed before, but that disappears after 5 minutes. After half an hour it turns into a slightly powdery, woody apricot which lingers on my skin overnight, becoming more sweetly musky before fading. When I wear it I feel in tune with my romantic, creative and loving nature. I think it is sexy in a cozy way, and men seem to like it on me.
igor585 – :
I love it but think it’s too old nowadays, even though it’s classic.
andranik66666 – :
In my skin he is much like Dolce Vita by Dior
NikolayRudakov – :
For older women ? Someone told me before I use it, I’m not sure but I like it a lot
vopspound – :
I don’t agree with the futiy category, but I love this scent.
графические картинки – :
I dont agree with the fruity smell. I hate fruity sweet perfumes and yet I love this perfume. What gives?
dikis – :
quite strong for me. but it’s not sweet type. had a bit powder smell which I don’t like.
Gail35 – :
This is best alternative for young girls who think original Tresor is too sharp. Fruity and sweet, like summer breeze.
molot4y – :
this perfume reminds autumn afternoons, the soft smell of fruits with a scent of wood. it is more floral chipre than floral fruity
kasminaolya87 – :
i bought this perfume last year and i spen a lot of money on it but i think it was worth it
APAR – :
My auntie works at Lancome i’ll have her bring me a sample. It’s hard for me to believe this falls in the fruity floral category.