To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Alexander4544 – :
Sometime ago I bought this and other 3 scents from Milton Lloyd…and then I received a sample of Lou Lou from Cacharel. I found them quite similar!So when I used Lou lou almost every co-worker asked me what I am wearing, thinking it was a very very good perfume, and while I used Jo-Jo, the scent kind of changed a little bit on me, the longevity was still good, but the smell was something else, my husband said it’s like something only old women wear, a kind of smell that he can feels it only in church…so I gifted to my mother-in-law and she totally liked it!
-BopoH- – :
I’ve got to agree that there is a slight resemblance (a flippin brief one at that!) to the original Cacharel Loulou. Aside from that it is pretty awful. Only marginally good enough to use for room fragrance spray. There is also a scary resemblance to fly spray! Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
hhz786Bessinepome – :
I’m very fond of LouLou and still have a bottle. My first impression of JoJo was very unlike Lou Lou, slightly burnt metal with a bit of burnt rubber. After a while, i could detect resemblance to Lou Lou with its pungent poppy raspy powdery sweetness but it feels like a faded photo of a famous vibrant painting. This miss the impact power of Lou Lou and it’s creamier, softer, more hazy and with some unrecognised aldehydes thrown in. It feels more like a dream than an experience. To me it left an unsatisfactory feeling of not being enough.
aka25 – :
remember Lou Lou by Cacharel, but the musk wears off with time, which left the smell of wood; remember something vintage!!!
master696 – :
remember Lou Lou by Cacharel, but the musk wears off with time, which left the smell of wood; remember something vintage!!!
tochka – :
so this is like lou lou from years ago? I must try it!
update.. I bought this today and at first couldn’t decide if it was like loulou from years ago. I had to try it several times without any other fragrances on me (I also bought some al haramain oils at the same time). yes it is like lou lou from my teens but I think my tastes have changed because Im not blown away by it like I used to be. however I do prefer it to the reformulated loulou that is in the shops now
puk93 – :
This is LouLou at a fraction of the price, I really enjoy the original but get a real kick out of wearing this too.
спринтер сел – :
if you miss lolou by chacharel the vintage then go for this its almost an idintical copy of it for fraction of the price