To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
jmrnko – :
Wow. This one brings back memories. It was the real first fragrance I ever used or bought for myself back in the 1960’s when I was a teenager. I thought I was really something going to school with a real grown up scent. It was my signature fragrance back then. I wore it throughout my high school days. My, how things have changed. Although, I haven’t smelled or worn it in 40 plus years, I don’t think it would be something I would like today. There’s too many choices out there to pick from now. But it’s nice to know that it’s still around.
andrgan62 – :
One of the perfumes that CLARICE LISPECTOR wore:
“[W]e need to talk. It so happens that I thought that nothing was any use any more. Then I saw an ad for a perfume by Coty, called Unexpected. The perfume is cheap. But it helped me to remember that good unexpected things happen too. And whenever I’m discouraged, I put on Unexpected. It gives me luck. You, for exemple, were not expected. And I unexpectedly accepted an afternoon signing books.
Yours, Clarice”
Source: Borelli, Olga. “Limiar, a difícil definição”, in Lispector, A paixão segundo G. H, in Moser, Benjamin (2009). “Why this world – A biography of Clarice Lispector”, Oxford: New York.
vetskor – :
I remember really liking this scent as a teenager, and now I understand why. It has a sharp, fresh woody smell throughout from the citrus, oakmoss and woodsy notes; I think I also detect some pine or cedar. It’s almost a unisex fragrance on me, but toward the end the floral notes and the sweetness of the cloves becomes more dominant, tempering the more masculine elements.
I was only able to find a small amount of the EDC within my price range, and unfortunately the longevity is very brief (although the sillage isn’t bad for a cologne while it lasts). I must try to find some EDP…
Barbie-girl – :
Ha! I too wore this as a young teenager. It was not a good choice. Never remember recieving any compliments on it, quite the
contrary in fact! 😉
gamer44 – :
Many vintage perfume lovers praise this scent, so I was very happy when I landed a sealed 1970’s splash bottle of the PDT. I’ve worn it now and then, dabbing it on from the bottle, and while it was perfectly nice, I wasn’t wowed.. Today, inspired by SadieBluesLady’s recent review, I decanted some of my PDT into an atomizer and went to town. Okay, NOW I get it. Imprevu is a surprising and rare composition. It’s a softly woody and spicy chypre. The hesperidic opening may be muted with time, but it still sets up a fresh introduction to the scent. Imprevu is greener than Quadrille, although they share some spices in common. It has cleaner wood, leather, and moss basenotes than Vol de Nuit, since they are not veiled by the dollop of Guerlain vanillla. The drydown is wonderful sandalwood and soft leather. When I am wearing Imprevu, I keep sniffing myself, because it is so subtle and complex. The PDT lasts about 5-6 hours on me: it may be time to get my hands on some vintage extrait.
stas1972_72 – :
I have the feeling, from reading these reviews, that the vintage of one’s bottle plays a huge role in whether or not you get the original woody chypre or just some reformulated to death pallid excuse of a scent. Also, the strength of the juice has to play a significant part in how it is perceived by the wearer.
I just received my partially used 1.5 oz bottle of parfum de toilette and it is very wonderful!! I somehow managed to find a reasonably priced bottle on Ebay and claimed it before anyone else had a chance. And I am so happy that I did!!! I never would have been happy with anything weaker than parfum de toilette for this rich scent. My best guess is that my bottle is from the 70’s and it is a splash, not a spray.
pavlin67 – :
I recently acquired a vintage bottle, and though to some beautiful, not for me. Reminds me of Chanel 5 in a way and very long lasting.
joydayboype – :
When I opened my Imprevu’s small bottle I thought I knew what to expect. Another great deep mossy and moody perhaps masterpiece. Well….a light wet earthy smell is there indeed. Sweet peppery moss on the background. Woods and subtle leather are detectable. Why it doesn’t seem to me as a serious retro chypre? Because I feel also playful glowing notes of bitter orange and gentle flowers in between. I feel as if the wet fog is lifting and warm sun beams start to carress my skin. Imprevu is subtle from the beginning but extremely long lasting. Nicely sweet with a slight sour juicy note and remains ethereal despite its earthy status.
kristina18com – :
This is one of those classically complex dark chypres that’s so wonderful I can’t even begin to articulate the experience of it in words, it just has to be experienced. It harks back to the bold chypres of the 1930’s through 50’s There’s far more to it than the notes listed above. I couldn’t disagree with Kiku’s review more…there is something very memorable about Imprevu and it’s quite far from “bland”. All I can say is that if you’re a lover of the classic chypres, try this if you can find it, because even small amounts go for big bucks on ebay.
wowan1998 – :
I wore imprevu when from when I was 16 until I could no longer buy it. I loved the fragrance very mush, it is such a shame that it was discontinued. I would buy it still if it were back in production.
ZewadasseKaks – :
@virginia777 It´s still available on Ebay.
P.S. I´ve got a 6.0 oz bottle for sale.
mangust – :
I wore Imprevu when I was 16 and was in love with it. Wish I had some today. Wish it would go back into production as it is so rich and heady. LOVE IT!!!!
suren020285 – :
I wore this one in my mid to late teens. I liked it a lot back then & remember it as having a somewhat “green” quality to it. Maybe that green quality for me came from the aldehydes. I do remember it as very “womanly” & more mature fragrance than I usually wore back then. I loved the bottle & the pronunciation of the name. Other than that, I don’t recall anything else about it.
mmause – :
I was very fond of Imprevu when i was given some in Australia in about 1966. It was an a blue bottle and was a liquid creme perfume which was applied with a spatula connected to the lid. I only had the one bottle because i did not earn much money. I have looked in vain for it since. All the notes were very nice on me, but I believe it could smell different on other people, as many perfumes do.
dima_dima – :
I’m not surprized there are no reviews for this scent. As popular as it was(and it was very, very popular) it was not memorable. Like so many Cotys the opening was a lovely blend of citruses. But this one had something very unpleasant in the dry down, a “dirty shoe” smell. Other than this unpleasant note it was bland. I’m surprized it’s still around.